The controversy between two sets of social work researchers and theorists has the potential to split the profession into warring camps. Both sides have cloaked their arguments in philosophical constructs that may not be familiar to practitioners. This article translates the discussion into straightforward language and suggests that the advocates of the “pure” science approach have the weaker position because they have made a pseudoreligion out of science.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AnastasiA. (1989). Psychological testing (6th ed.). New York: Macmillan.
2.
AudenW. H. (1974). The Protestant mystics. In Forewords and afterwords (pp. 49–78). New York: Random House.
3.
BergerP. L., & LuckmannT. L. (1966). The social construction of reality.Garden City, NY: Double-day.
4.
CaputoR. K. (1985). The role of research in the family service agency. Social Casework, 66, 205–212.
5.
CaputoR. K. (1991). Doctoral level research: Issues and resolutions in curriculum development. Arete, 16(1), 39–50.
6.
GeismarL. (1982). Debate with authors. Social Service Review, 56, 311–312.
7.
GleickJ. (1987). Chaos.New York: Penguin.
8.
GoldsteinH. (1992). If social work hasn't made progress as a science, might it be an art?Families in Society, 73, 48–55.
9.
HarrisonD. F.HudsonW. H., & ThyerB. A. (1992). On a critical analysis of empirical clinical practice: A response to Witkin's revised views. Social Work, 37, 461–464.
10.
HartmanA. (1990). Editorial: Many ways of knowing. Social Work, 35, 3–4.
11.
HeinemanM. B. (1981). The obsolete scientific imperative in social work research. Social Service Review, 55, 371–379.
12.
HudsonW. H. (1978). First axioms of treatment. Social Work, 23, 65–66.
13.
ImreR. W. (1991). What do we need to know for good practice?Social Work, 36, 198–199.
14.
JayaratneS., & LevyR. (1979). Empirical clinical practice.New York: Columbia University Press.
15.
PeileC. (1988). Research paradigms in social work: From stalemate to creative synthesis. Social Service Review, 62, 1–19.
16.
PieperM. H. (1985). The future of social work research. Social Work Research and Abstracts, 21(4), 3–11.
17.
RandallJ. H.Jr. (1946). The making of the modern mind (2nd ed.) New York: Columbia University Press.
18.
SchuermanJ. R. (1982). Debate with authors. Social Service Review, 56, 144–146.
19.
ThyerB. A. (1989). First principles of practice research. British Journal of Social Work, 19, 309–323.
20.
UngerR. K.DraperR. D., & PendergrassM. L. (1986). Personal epistemology and personal experience. Journal of Social Issues, 42, 67–69.
21.
WeickA. (1986). The philosophical context of a health model of social work. Social Casework, 67, 551–559.
22.
WitkinS. L. (1991). Empirical clinical practice: A critical analysis. Social Work, 36, 158–163.
23.
WitkinS. L. (1992). Empirical clinical practice or Witkin's revised views: Which is the issue?Social Work, 37, 465–468.
24.
WitkinS. L., & GottschalkS. (1988). Alternative criteria for theory evaluation. Social Service Review, 62, 211–224.
25.
ZimmermanJ. H. (1989). Determinism, science, and social work. Social Service Review, 63, 52–62.
26.
ZuurdeegW. F. (1945). The consequences of the Vienna Circle for ethics.Utrecht, The Netherlands: Kemink en Zoon, N. V.
