Low-income women and the welfare system are under attack by liberals and conservatives, academicians and politicians. “Welfare reform” proposals include cutting benefits unless women pay rent, bear no children while receiving benefits, and ensure that their children attend school and receive vaccinations. Although these reforms are couched in the language of fiscal responsibility and control, the authors argue that the underlying purpose behind such policies is reform of women, not reform of welfare.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbramovitzM. (1988). Regulating the lives of women.Boston: South End Press.
2.
Ad Hoc Committee on Public Welfare. (1961). Report to the Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare.Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
3.
Aid to Families with Dependent Children. (1992). Youth Policy, 14(7-8), 9.
4.
AxinnJ., & LevinH. (1992). Social welfare: A history of the American response to need (3rd ed.). New York: Longman.
5.
AxinnJ., & SternM. (1988). Dependency and poverty.Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
6.
BaneM., & JargowskyP. (1988). The links between government policy and family structure: What matters and what doesn't. In CherlinA. J. (Ed.), The changing American family and public policy (pp. 219–251). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
7.
BellW. (1965). Aid to dependent children.New York: Columbia University Press.
8.
Center on Social Welfare Policy and Law. (1992). 1991: The poor got poorer as welfare programs were slashed.Washington, DC: Author.
Children's Defense Fund. (1992). Medicaid and childhood immunizations.Washington, DC: Author.
11.
ClintonB. (1992). Putting people first. Youth Policy, 14(7-8), 24.
12.
DeHavenonA. (1987–88). Administrative closings of public assistance cases. New York University Review of Law and Social Change, 16, 741–746.
13.
DeParleJ. (1991, December 9). To Moynihan, welfare dependency signals new ill. New York Times, p. A13.
14.
EllwoodD. T. (1988). Poor support: Poverty in the American family.New York: Basic Books.
15.
EllwoodD. T. (1992). Child support enforcement and insurance proposal. Youth Policy, 14(7-8), p. 10.
16.
HarrisD. (1987–88). Child support for welfare families. New York University Review of Law and Social Change, 16, 619–657.
17.
HirschA. (1987–88). Income deeming in the AFDC program. New York University Review of Law and Social Change, 16, 713–733.
18.
InfilG. (1983, February 3). Clinton seeking $31 billion in stimulus. New York Times, p. A1.
19.
JencksC. (1992). Rethinking social policy: Race, poverty and the underclass.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20.
KingW. (1992, January 14). New Jersey lawmakers approve a package to overhaul welfare. New York Times, p. A1.
21.
KrochE. (1991). Recent real income and wage trends in the United States. Federal Reserve Bank of New York Quarterly Review, 16(2), 36–39.
22.
LeffM. H. (1989). The mothers' pension movement in the Progressive Era. In CritchlowD. T., & HawleyE. W. (Eds.), Poverty and public policy in modem America.Chicago: Dorsey Press.
23.
MeadL. M. (1986). Beyond entitlement: The social obligations of citizenship.New York: Free Press.
24.
MeadL. M. (1992). The new politics of poverty: The nonworking poor in America.New York: Basic Books.
25.
MoynihanD. P. (1989, Summer). Toward a post-industrial social policy. Public Interest, 96, 16–27.
26.
MurrayC. (1984). Losing ground: American social policy 1950–1980.New York: Basic Books.
27.
NasarS. (1992, October 4). How states wiggle out of tax increases. New York Times, p. E3.
28.
New York Times. (1992, March 18). p. C1.
29.
PearR. (1992, May 12). Census Bureau reports low earnings. New York Times, p. A15.
30.
State of the Union. (1992, January 29). New York Times, p. A10.
31.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1992). Money income of households, families, and persons in the United States: 1991. Current Population Reports, 180. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
32.
U.S. Congress House Committee on Ways and Means. (1991). Green book: Overview of entitlement programs.Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
33.
U.S. General Accounting Office. (1991, April). Mother-only families (GAO/HRD-91-62). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
34.
WarrenE. (1992, May 9). Bush blames welfare. Philadelphia Inquirer, p. A1.
35.
WilliamsL. A. (1992). The ideology of division. Yale Law Journal, 102, 719–746.
36.
ZellmanG.FeiferC., & HirschA. (1992). Access to and use of vocational education in teen parent programs. Rand Report (R-4170-NCRVE/UCB). Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
