This study investigates the family-involvement strategies employed in Adolescent Family Life (AFL)-funded care programs for pregnant and parenting teenagers. Results from a survey of directors, supervisors, and line workers in more than 50 AFL programs show that only a minority of programs involve families in their intake, program, and discharge practices. Some of the barriers to involving families include large case loads; lack of training, funding, and administrative support; and negative staff attitudes about working with dysfunctional families. Although family-involvement practices are minimal, a majority of program workers have positive attitudes about the importance and effectiveness of family involvement. Policy and practice implications are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BaldwinW., & CainV. (1980). The children of teenage parents. Family Planning Perspectives, 12, 334–343.
2.
BurtM. R.KimmichM. H.GoldmuntzJ., & SonensteinF. L. (1984). Helping pregnant adolescents: Outcomes and costs of service delivery (Final report on the Evaluation of Adolescent Pregnancy Programs). Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
3.
CoblinerW. G. (1981). Teenage pregnancy: Who is most at risk?The Female Patient, 6, 63–68.
4.
FisherT. D. (1989). Family sexual communication and adolescent sexual behavior. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 631–639.
5.
FurstenburgF. F. (1976). Unplanned parenthood: The social consequences of teenage childbearing.New York: Free Press.
6.
FurstenburgF. F. (1981). Implicating the family: Teenage parenthood and kinship involvement. In OomsT. (Ed.), Teenage pregnancy in a family context: lmplications for policy (pp. 131–164). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
7.
HansonS. L.MyersD. E., & GinsburgA. L. (1987). The role of responsibility and knowledge in reducing teenage out-of-wedlock childbearing. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49, 241–256.
8.
HayesC. (Ed.). (1987). Risking the future: Adolescent sexuality, pregnancy, and childbearing (vol. 1). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
9.
HoganD., & KitagawaE. (1985). The impact of social status, family structure, and neighborhood on the fertility of black adolescents. American Journal of Sociology, 90, 825–836.
10.
LandryS.SchubertJ.ClelandJ. F.ClarkC., & MontgomeryJ. S. (1983). Teenage pregnancy: Family syndrome. Adolescence, 28, 679–694.
11.
LevyS., & GrinkerW. J. (1983). Choices and life circumstances. An ethnographic study of Project Redirection teens.New York: Manpower Demonstration Research Corp.
12.
Litton-FoxG. (1981). The family's role in adolescent sexual behavior. In OomsT. (Ed.), Teenage pregnancy in a family context: Implications for policy (pp. 73–130). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
13.
MillerB. C., & JorgensenS. R. (1988). Adolescent fertility-related behavior and its family linkages. In KleinD., & AldousJ. (Eds.), Social stress and family development.New York: Guilford Press.
14.
MillerB. C.McKoyJ. K.OlsonT. C., & WallaceC. M. (1986). Parental discipline and control attempts in relation to adolescent sexual attitudes and behavior. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 503–512.
15.
MillerB. C., & MooreK. A. (1990). Adolescent sexual behavior, pregnancy, and parenting. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 1025–1044.
16.
OomsT. (1981). Family involvement, notification, and responsibility: A personal essay. In OomsT. (Ed.), Teenage pregnancy in a family context: Implications for policy (pp. 321–398). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
17.
OomsT. (1984). The family context of adolescent parenting. In SugarM. (Ed.), Adolescent parenthood.Jamaica, NY: Spectrum Publications.
18.
PerlmanS. B. (1980). Pregnancy and parenting among runaway girls. Journal of Family Issues, 1, 262–273.
19.
Polit-O'HaraE.KahnJ. R., & StevensD. (1984). Project Redirection impact analysis: Final report.Jefferson City, MO: Humanalysis.
20.
RosenR. H. (1980, Spring). Adolescent pregnancy decision making: Are parents important?Adolescence, 15, 43–54.
