The functioning of single- and two-parent adoptive families is described and compared by means of psychosocial analysis. Data were collected via a survey mailed to families who had finalized their adoption of a special-needs child. Differences in demographic characteristics were observed, as were differences in social and ecological functioning. Although most families were satisfied with their decision to adopt, results indicated a modest trend toward more positive adoption outcome among single parents.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AchenbachT. M., & EdelbrockC. S. (1983). Manual for the child behavior checklist and revised child behavior profile.Burlington, VT: Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont.
2.
BarthR. P., & BerryM. (1988). Adoption and disruption: Rates, risks, and response.New York: Aldine De Gruyter.
3.
BarthR. P.BerryM.YoshikamiR.GoodfieldR. K., & CarsonM. L. (1988). Predicting adoption disruption. Social Work, 33, 227–233.
4.
BlalockH. M. (1979). Social statistics (rev., 2nd ed.). St. Louis: McGraw-Hill.
5.
BourguignonJ-P. (1989, May–June). Single parent adoptions. Workshop presented at Sustaining Adoption National Conference, Charleston, SC.
6.
BoyneJ.DenbyL.KettenringJ. R., & WheelerW. (1984). The shadow of success: A statistical analysis of outcomes of adoptions of hard-to-place children.Westfield, NJ: Spaulding for Children.
7.
BranhamE. (1970). One parent adoptions. Children, 17(3), 103–107.
8.
CohenJ., & CohenP. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9.
DoughertyS. (1978). Single adoptive parents and their children. Social Work, 23, 311–314.
10.
FeigelmanW., & SilvermanA. R. (1977). Single parent adoptions. Social Casework, 58, 418–425.
11.
FeigelmanW., & SilvermanA. R. (1983). Chosen children: New patterns of adoptive relationships.New York: Praeger.
12.
FestingerT. (1986). Necessary risk: A study of adoptions and disrupted adoptive placements.New York: Child Welfare League of America.
13.
GrozeV., & RosenthalJ. A. (1989a). Special-needs adoption survey: An analysis of Oklahoma's intact adoptive families and children. Monograph prepared for the Oklahoma Department of Human Services, Oklahoma City, OK.
14.
GrozeV., & RosenthalJ. A. (1989b). Kansas intact families and their adopted children: A survey analysis of special needs adoptions. Monograph prepared for the Kansas Department of Social and Rehabilitative Services, Topeka, KS.
15.
GrozeV., & RosenthalJ. A. (1989c). Subsidized adoptions in Illinois: A survey of special needs children and their intact families. Monograph prepared for the State of Illinois, Department of Children and Family Services, Springfield, IL.
16.
JordanF., & LittleW. (1966). Early comments on single-parent adoptive homes. Child Welfare, 45, 536–538.
17.
KadushinA. (1970). Single-parent adoptions: An overview and some relevant research. Social Service Review, 44, 263–274.
18.
KaganR. M., & ReidW. J. (1986). Critical factors in the adoption of emotionally disturbed youths. Child Welfare, 65, 63–73.
ReidW. J.KaganR. M.KaminskyA., & HelmerK. (1987). Adoption of older institutionalized youth. Social Casework, 68, 140–149.
21.
ShiremanJ. F. (1988). Growing up adopted: An examination of some major issues.Chicago: Chicago Child Care Society.
22.
ShiremanJ., & JohnsonP. (1976). Single persons as adoptive parents. Social Service Review, 50, 103–116.
23.
ShiremanJ., & JohnsonP. (1985). Single-parent adoptions: A longitudinal study. Children and Youth Services Review, 7, 321–334.
24.
ShiremanJ., & JohnsonP. (1986). A longitudinal study of black adoptions: Single parent, transracial, and traditional. Social Work, 31, 172–176.
25.
Urban Systems Research and Engineering. (1985). Evaluation of state activities with regard to adoption disruption.Washington, DC: Urban Research and Engineering.
