The author surveyed social workers engaged in both agency and private practice and found no major differences in how direct client services were rendered in either setting. Although the exclusionary nature of private practice is an issue of concern, being active in both settings is a viable professional option and an accommodation to the stresses and low financial rewards of full-time agency practice.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Psychiatric Association. (1987). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 3rd ed., rev. Washington, DC: Author.
2.
BarkerR. L. (1984). Social work in private practice.Silver Spring, MD: National Association of Social Workers.
3.
BeckD. F. (1987). Counselor burnout in family agencies. Social Casework, 68, 5–15.
4.
BeckD. F. (1988). Counselor characteristics: How they affect outcomes.Milwaukee, WI: Family Service America.
5.
BeckD. F., & JonesM. A. (1973). Progress on family problems.New York: Family Service Association of America.
6.
BlumensteinH. (1988). Survival issues challenging family agencies. Social Casework, 69, 107–115.
7.
BorenzweigH. (1981). Agency vs. private practice: Similarities and differences. Social Work, 26, 239–244.
8.
DonovanR. (1987). Stress in the workplace: A framework for research and practice. Social Casework, 68, 259–266.
9.
FriedE. S. (1986). American aging family services. Publicity release available from E. S. Fried, 80 University Place, Suite 4, New York, NY, 10003.
10.
GoldmeierJ. (1976). Short-term models in long-term treatment. Social Work, 21, 350–356.
11.
GoldmeierJ. (1986). Private practice and the purchase of services. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 56, 89–101.
12.
HenigR. M. (1988, June 26). Less can be more. The New York Times Magazine, pp. 33–35.
13.
HuttmanE. H. (1985). Social services for the elderly.New York: Free Press.
14.
JayaratneS.SiefertK., & ChessW. A. (1988). Private and agency practitioners: Some data and observation. Social Service Review, 62, 324–335.
15.
KelleyP., & AlexanderP. (1985). Part-time private practice: Practical and ethical considerations. Social Work, 30, 254–258.
16.
KramerR. (1973). Future of voluntary service organizations. Social Work, 18, 64.
17.
LeightonA. (1982). Caring for mentally ill people.New York: Cambridge University Press.
18.
LevinA. M. (1974). Handbook on the private practice of social work.Washington, DC: National Association of Social Workers.
19.
LevinA. M. (1983). The private practice of psychotherapy.New York: Free Press.
20.
McNeelyR. L. (1988). Five morale-enhancing innovations for human service settings. Social Casework, 69, 204–213.
21.
MerleS. (1962). Some arguments against private practice. Social Work, 7, 12.
22.
MeyerC. H. (1987). Private practice in social work: The profession is not ready (comments from readers). Social Casework, 68, 314.
23.
National Association of Social Workers. (1981). Standards for the classification of social work practice, policy statement 4.Silver Spring, MD: Author.
24.
National Association of Social Workers. (1986). Membership renewal data 1986.Silver Spring, MD: Author.
25.
National Association of Social Workers. (1987). Salaries in social work.Silver Spring, MD: Author.
26.
NealeN. K. (1983). Private practice. In RosenblattA., & WaldfogelD. (Eds.), Handbook of clinical social work (pp. 1037–1055). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
27.
PiliavinI. (1968). Restructuring the provision of social services. Social Work, 13, 34–41.
28.
ProchaskaJ. (1978). Private practice may benefit voluntary agencies. Social Casework, 59, 371–375.
29.
SaxtonP. M. (1988). Vendorship in social work. Social Work, 33, 197–204.
30.
WallaceM. E. (1982). Private practice: A nationwide study. Social Work, 27, 262–267.
31.
WalshJ. A. (1987). Burnout and values in the social work profession. Social Casework, 68, 279–281.
32.
Weissman, H., Epstein, 1., & Savage, A. (Eds.). (1983). Agency-based social work, neglected aspects of clinical practice.Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
33.
WellsR. A. (1982). Planned short-term treatment.New York: Free Press.
