The personal characteristics of a worker and a client can have an immense impact on the clinical process. Transference and countertransference literature was reviewed and applied to the personal accounts of five social workers who are physically disabled. Underlying conflictual issues that may be stirred in clients and workers by the physical disability of a worker in a clinical setting are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllenH. A., & CohenM. S. (1987). Client preference for a disabled counselor. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 3(3), 165–168.
2.
AschA., & RoussoH. (1985). Therapists with disabilities: Theoretical and clinical issues. Psychiatry, 48, 1–11.
3.
BlankG., & BlankR. (1979). Ego Psychology II.New York: Columbia University Press.
4.
BrahamR. E., & ThoresonR. W. (1973). Relationship of client preferences and counselor's physical disability. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 20(1), 10–15.
5.
HollisF., & WoodsM. (1981). Casework: A psychosocial therapy (3rd ed.). New York: Random House.
6.
MitchellD., & FredereksonW. (1975). Preferences for physically disabled counselors in hypothetical counseling situations. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 22(6), 477–482.
7.
ParadH. (1958). Ego psychology and dynamic casework.New York: Family Service Association of America.
8.
RhodesS. (1978). Communication and interaction in the worker-client dyad. Social Service Review, 52(1), 120–131.
9.
RhodesS. (1979). The personality of the worker: An unexplored dimension in treatment. Social Casework, 60, 259–264.
10.
SchwartzM. (1978). Helping the worker with counter-transference. Social Work, 23, 204–209.
11.
WeinbergL. (1978). Unique learning needs of physically handicapped social work students. Journal of Education for Social Work, 14(1), 110–111.
