Case-management services are provided in diverse practice fields and program settings. The author explores reasons for the popularity of case management and examines myths and realities that have developed around its use. Although case management is relevant and useful in the delivery of human services, it is important to understand its limitations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Public Welfare Association. (1987, July 31). Case management and welfare reform. W-Memo, Memorandum W-7, Washington, DC.
2.
AltschulerS. C., & ForwardJ. (1978). The inverted hierarchy: A case management approach to mental health services. Administration in Mental Health, 6(1), 57–68.
3.
AustinC. (1983). Case management in long-term care: Options and opportunities. Health and Social Work, 8(1), 16–30.
4.
AustinC.ApplebaumR., & AtchleyR. (1987, April). The Passport Program: Program review. College of Social Work, Ohio State University, and Scripps Foundation Gerontology Center, Miami University.
5.
CohnA. H., & DegraafB. (1982). Assessing case management in the child abuse field. Journal of Social Service Research, 5(1-2), 29–43.
6.
DeWeaverK. L., & JohnsonP. L. (1983). Case management in rural areas for the developmentally disabled. Human Services in the Rural Environment, 8(4), 23–31.
7.
GreeneR. R. (1987). Case management: Helping the homeless mentally ill and persons with AIDS and their families. National Association of Social Workers Concept Paper, Silver Spring, MD.
8.
HarrisD. V. (1987, April). Case management is gaining popularity in the public sector. NASW News, 32(4), 2.
9.
HepworthD. (1986). Direct social work practice: Theory and skills.Chicago: Dorsey Press.
10.
IntagliaJ. (1980). Operationalizing a case management system: A multi-level approach. In Case management: State of the art. Proceedings of the National Case Management Conference. Indianapolis, IN.
11.
JohnsonP. J., & RubinA. (1983). Case management in mental health: A social work domain?Social Work, 28(1), 49–55.
12.
National Association of Social Workers. (1984). NASW standards and guidelines for social work case management for the functionally impaired.Silver Spring, MD: National Association of Social Workers.
13.
Office of the Governor. (1987, August). Case management in human service programs. Columbus, Ohio.
14.
RichmondMary (1922). Social diagnosis.New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
15.
RubinA. (1986), Case management. In Encyclopedia of social work (pp. 212–222). New York: Springer.
16.
SchwartzS. R.GoldmanH. H., & ChurginS. (1982). Case management for the chronic mentally ill: Models and dimensions. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 33(12), 1006–1009.
17.
SecordL. (1987). Private case management for older persons and their families: Practice, policy potential.Excelsior, MN: Interstudy.
