Organizing concepts of “strength” and “pathology” are explored from the perspective of the limitations of language in defining and treating human problems. The derivation of these terms is described as is their entry into the lexicon and procedures of the social work profession. Each concept is examined in terms of its relevance for practice. The strength orientation is shown to be more responsive to the humanistic, ethical, and political conditions that characterize the helping process.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Psychiatric Association. (1987). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed., rev.). Washington, DC: Author.
2.
BeckerE. (1964). The revolution in psychiatry.New York: Free Press.
3.
BussA. R. (1979). A dialectical psychology.New York: Irvington Publishers.
4.
EllenbergerH. (1970). The discovery of the unconscious.New York: Basic Books.
5.
GazzanigaM. S. (1988). Mind matters.Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
6.
GergenK. J. (1985). The social constructionist movement in modern psychology. American Psychologist, 40, 266–275.
7.
GleickJ. (1987). Chaos: Making a new science.New York: Viking.
8.
HeisenbergW. (1958). Physics and philosophy: The revolution in modem science.New York: Harper & Brothers.
9.
RhodesM. (1986). Ethical dilemmas in social work practice.Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
10.
SontagS. (1977). Illness as metaphor.New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
