Two representative articles are LevingerGeorge, “Continuance in Casework and Other Helping Relationships: A Review of Current Research,”Social Work, Vol. V, July 1960, pp. 40–51, and Lilian Ripple, “Factors Associated with Continuance in Casework Service,” Social Work, Vol. II, January 1957, pp. 87–94.
2.
See ColemanJules V. and others, “A Comparative Study of a Psychiatric Clinic and a Family Agency: Parts I and II,”Social Casework, Vol. XXXVIII, January and February 1957, pp. 3–8 and pp. 74–80.
3.
See FanshelDavid, “A Study of Caseworkers' Perceptions of Their Clients,”Social Casework, Vol. XXXIX, December 1958, pp. 543–51; Henry M. Graham and David L. Blumenthal, “Why We Failed—As Clients See It,” Family Service Highlights, Vol. XVI, June 1955, pp. 91–94; Ralph H. Gundlach and Max Geller, “The Problem of Early Termination: Is It Really the Terminee?” Journal of Consulting Psychology, Vol. XXII, December 1958, p. 410; Norman Polansky and Jacob Kounin, “Clients' Reactions to Initial Interviews: A Field Study,” Human Relations, Vol. LX, August 1956, pp. 237–64; Frances B. Stark, “Barriers to Client-Worker Communication at Intake,” Social Casework, Vol. XL, April 1959, pp. 177–83; and Edwin Thomas, Norman Polansky, and Jacob Kounin, “The Expected Behavior of a Potentially Helpful Person,” Human Relations, Vol. VIII, May 1955, pp. 165–74.
4.
See Ripple, op. cit., p. 87.
5.
See BlenknerMargaret, HuntJ. McV., and KoganLeonard S., “A Study of Interrelated Factors in the Initial Interview with New Clients,”Social Casework, Vol. XXXII, January 1951, pp. 23–30.
6.
The fact that few of family agencies' current cases are new and from intact families is not generally recognized, but has been confirmed. See Dorothy Fahs Beck, Patterns in Use of Family Agency Service, Family Service Association of America, New York, 1962.
7.
See Polansky and Kounin, op. cit., pp. 259–62, and Thomas, Polansky, and Kounin, op. cit., pp. 173–74.
