ClowardRichard A., “Social Class and Private Social Agencies,” in Education for Social Work: Proceedings: Eleventh Annual Program Meeting, Council on Social Work Education, Council on Social Work Education, New York, 1963, pp. 123–44.
2.
See for example, BragerGeorge, “Motivation—A Social Worker's Perspective,” in Education for Social Work with “Unmotivated” Clients (“Brandeis University Papers in Social Welfare,” No. 9), Florence Heller Graduate School for Advanced Studies in Social Welfare, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, 1965, pp. 161–80.
3.
SetleisLloyd, “Civil Rights and the Rehabilitation of AFDC Clients,”Social Work, Vol. IX, April 1964, pp. 3–9; Walter C. Bentrup, “The Profession and the Means Test,” Social Work, Vol. IX, April 1964, pp. 10–17; C. H. King and Clara Rabinowitz, “The Impact of Public Welfare Practice on Family Attitudes with Special Reference to Delinquent Children,” American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, Vol. XXXV, April 1965, pp. 609–13.
4.
KahnAlfred J., “The Societal Context of Social Work Practice,”Social Work, Vol. X, October 1965, pp. 145–55.
5.
RobinsonVirginia, A Changing Psychology in Social Case Work, University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 1934.
6.
PerlmanHelen Harris, “Social Casework,” in Encyclopedia of Social Work, LurieHarry L. (ed.), National Association of Social Workers, New York, 1965, pp. 704–14.
7.
TaftJessie, “The Relation of Function to Process in Social Case Work,” inTraining for Skill in Social Case Work, RobinsonVirginia P. (ed.), University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, 1942, pp. 109–10.
8.
SchorrAlvin L., “Poverty,” inEncyclopedia of Social Work, LurieHarry L. (ed.), National Association of Social Workers, New York, 1965, pp. 559–65.
9.
KadushinAlfred, “The Knowledge Base of Social Work,” inIssues in American Social Work, KahnAlfred J. (ed.), Columbia University Press, New York, 1959, p. 58.
10.
HearnGordon, “The General Systems Approach to the Understanding of Groups,” inHealth Education Monographs, No. 14, Society of Public Health Educators, Rye, New York, 1962.
11.
See American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, Vol. XXXVI, March 1966, for innumerable references to this point.
12.
Brager, op. cit., p. 169.
13.
Brager, op. cit., p. 169.
14.
Brager, op. cit., p. 168.
15.
BillingsleyAndrew, “The Role of the Social Worker in a Child Protective Agency,”Child Welfare, Vol. XLIII, November 1964, pp. 472–79.
16.
BillingsleyAndrew, “Bureaucratic and Professional Orientation Patterns in Social Casework,”Social Service Review, Vol. XXXVIII, December 1964, p. 403.
17.
BillingsleyAndrew, “Bureaucratic and Professional Orientation Patterns in Social Casework,”Social Service Review, Vol. XXXVIII, December 1964, p. 403.
18.
VarleyBarbara K., “Are Social Workers Dedicated to Service?”Social Work, Vol. XI, April 1966, pp. 84–91.
19.
HamiltonGordon, “Editor's Page,”Social Work, Vol. VII, January 1962, pp. 2, 128.
20.
HerzogElizabeth, Some Guide Lines for Evaluative Research, Children's Bureau, Social Security Administration, U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Washington, D.C., 1959. For an interesting elaboration on the relation of theory to practice, see pp. 32–33: “A number of studies indicate that the experience and competence of the practitioner are more influential in determining treatment outcome than is the school of practice in which he was trained.”
21.
BoehmWerner, “Relationship of Social Work to Other Professions,” inEncyclopedia of Social Work, LurieHarry L. (ed.), National Association of Social Workers, New York, 1965, pp. 640–49.
22.
TannerVirginia L., “Training for the Expanding Service Programs in Public Welfare,”Social Casework, Vol. XLVI, December 1965, pp. 599–606.