ElsonAlex, “Juvenile Courts and Due Process,” in Justice for the Child, RosenheimMargaret Keeney (ed.), Free Press of Glencoe, New York, 1962, p. 99.
2.
RosenheimMargaret Keeney, “Perennial Problems in the Juvenile Court,” in Justice for the Child, RosenheimMargaret Keeney (ed.), Free Press of Glencoe, New York, 1962, p. 15.
3.
RubinSol, “Trends in Juvenile Court Philosophy,”Social Work, Vol. VII, April 1962, p. 53.
4.
New York Times, March 1, 1964, p. 55.
5.
New York Times, March 1, 1964, p. 55.
6.
Rubin, op. cit., p. 55.
7.
McCuneShirley D., and SkolerDaniel L., “Juvenile Court Judges in the United States. Part I: A National Profile,”Crime and Delinquency, Vol. XI, April 1965, p. 131.
8.
RosenheimMargaret K., and SkolerDaniel L., “The Lawyer's Role at Intake and Detention Stages of Juvenile Court Proceedings,”Crime and Delinquency, Vol. XI, April 1965, p. 168.
9.
SilerEugene E.Jr., “The Need for Defense Counsel in the Juvenile Court,”Crime and Delinquency, Vol. XI, January 1965, p. 58.
10.
FisherBernard C., “Juvenile Court: Purpose, Promise, and Problems,”Social Service Review, Vol. XXXIV, March 1960, pp. 78–79.
11.
DownsWilliam T., “Order in the Court,”Children, Vol. DC, July–August 1962, p. 143.
12.
StudtElliot, “The Client's Image of the Juvenile Court,” inJustice for the Child, op. cit., p. 204.
13.
LarsenLawrence C., “New Approaches in the Juvenile Court Setting,”Crime and Delinquency, Vol. X, April 1964, p. 162.
14.
SilvermanEdgar, “Lawyers and Social Workers in Juvenile Proceedings,”Crime and Delinquency, Vol. VI, July 1960, p. 263.
15.
GoldbergHarriet L., “Social Work and Law,”Children, Vol. VII, September–October 1960, pp. 167–71.
16.
KatzSanford N., “The Lawyer and the Caseworker: Some Observations,”Social Casework, Vol. XLII, January 1961, pp. 10–15.
17.
PolierJustine Wise, A View from the Bench, National Council on Crime and Delinquency, New York, 1964, pp. 10–11.
18.
RosenheimMargaret Keeney, “Justice for the Child,” in Serving Children through the Juvenile Court Setting, O'NeillJohn F. (ed.), abstract of proceedings of institute, University of Wisconsin Extension Division, Department of Social Work, Green Bay, Wisconsin, 1962, p. 22.
19.
Studt, op. cit., p. 204.
20.
PrayKenneth L. M., “The Place of Social Case Work in the Treatment of Delinquency,”Social Service Review, Vol. XIX, June 1945, pp. 235–48.
21.
See, for example, StudtElliot, “An Outline for Study of Social Authority Factors in Casework,” Social Casework, Vol. XXXV, June 1954, pp. 231–38; Dale G. Hardman, “Authority Is My Job,”NPPA Journal, Vol. III, July 1957, pp. 215–21; Dale G. Hardman, “Authority in Casework—a Bread-and-Butter Theory,” NPPA Journal, Vol. V, July 1959, pp. 249–55; Dale G. Hardman, “The Constructive Use of Authority,” Crime and Delinquency, Vol. VI, July 1960, pp. 245–54; Irving Weisman and Jacob Chwast, “Control and Values in Social Work Treatment,” Social Casework, Vol. XLI, November 1960, pp. 451–56; Gerald A. Tracey, “A Social Worker's Perspective on Social Work in Probation,” Crime and Delinquency, Vol. VII, April 1961, pp. 131–36; Arthur E. Fink, “Authority in the Correctional Process,” Federal Probation, Vol. XXV, September 1961, pp. 34–40; Robert M. Carter, “The ‘Authority Problem’ Revisited,” Federal Probation, Vol. XXV, December 1961, pp. 52–56.
22.
StudtElliot, Education for Social Workers in the Correctional Field, Vol. V of A Project Report of the Curriculum Study, Council on Social Work Education, New York, 1959, pp. 20–21.
23.
StudtElliot, Education for Social Workers in the Correctional Field, Vol. V of A Project Report of the Curriculum Study, Council on Social Work Education, New York, 1959, pp. 28–29.
24.
MeekerBen S., “The Curriculum Study: Implications for the Field of Corrections,”Social Casework, Vol. XLI, January 1960, p. 28.
25.
Silverman, op. cit., p. 265.
26.
MilesArthur P., “The Reality of the Probation Officer's Dilemma,”Federal Probation, Vol. XXIX, March 1965, p. 21.
27.
TregerHarvey, “Reluctance of the Social Agency To Work With the Offender,”Federal Probation, Vol. XXIX, March 1965, p. 24.