For a discussion of a group of studies of this type, see HollisFlorence, Casework: A Psychosocial Therapy, Random House, New York, 1964, pp. 54–55, 66–68.
2.
This study was one part of the writer's doctoral dissertation. For a more detailed report see ReidWilliam J., An Experimental Study of Methods Used in Casework Treatment, Columbia University School of Social Work, New York, 1963 (doctoral dissertation).
3.
KahnAlfred J., “The Design of Research,” in Social Work Research, PolanskyNorman A. (ed.), University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1960, pp. 48–73.
4.
The analogue was initially tested in a master's group project supervised by the writer. For details see Sydell Bernstein and others, The Use of Direction in Casework Treatment, Columbia University School of Social Work, New York, 1961 (master's thesis).
5.
ThomasEdwin J., “Experimental Analogs of the Casework Interview,”Social Work, Vol. VII, April 1962, pp. 24–30.
6.
These types were adapted in part from a classification of casework treatment developed by Florence Hollis. See Hollis, op. cit., pp. 65–130.
7.
FarberLaura, “Casework Treatment of Ambulatory Schizophrenics,”Social Casework, Vol. XXXIX, January 1958, p. 11.
8.
HollisFlorence, “Personality Diagnosis in Casework,” in Ego Psychology and Dynamic Casework, ParadHoward J. (ed.), Family Service Association of America, New York, 1958, p. 94.
9.
SundlandDonald M., and BarkerEdwin, “The Orientations of Psychotherapists,”Journal of Consulting Psychology, Vol. XXVI, June 1962, p. 210.
