For a history of the Columbia study and survey, see CurrieBrainerd, “The Materials of Law Study,”Journal of Legal Education, Vol. III, No. 3, 1951, pp. 331–83, and ibid., Vol. VIE, No. 1, 1955, pp. 1–78.
2.
For a brief history of the legal profession, see PoundRoscoe, The Lawyer from Antiquity to Modern Times, West Publishing Co., St. Paul, Minnesota, 1953.
3.
For a history of the Harvard Law School, see Harvard Law School Association, Centennial History of the Harvard Law School, The Association, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1918.
4.
HolmesOliver Wendell, Collected Legal Papers, Harcourt, Brace and Howe, New York, 1920, p. 50.
5.
PoundRoscoe, “Mechanical Jurisprudence,”Columbia Law Review, Vol. VIII, December 1908, p. 606.
6.
For a description of the evolution of substantive due process, see KauperPaul Gerhardt, Frontiers of Constitutional Liberty, University of Michigan Law School, Ann Arbor, 1957.
7.
StoneHarlan F., “The Future of Legal Education,”American Bar Association Journal, Vol. X, April 1924, pp. 234 and 235; see also Harlan F. Stone, “Some Aspects of the Problem of Law Simplification,” Columbia Law Review, Vol. XXIII, April 1923, pp. 319–37.
8.
See, for example, HallJerome, Theft, Law, and Society, Bobbs-Merrill Co., Indianapolis, Indiana, 1952; Adolph A. Berle, Jr., and Gardiner C. Means, The Modern Corporation and Private Property, Commerce Clearing House, Loose Leaf Service Division of the Corporation Trust Co., New York, 1932; K. N. Llewellyn and E. Adamson Hoebel, The Cheyenne Way, University of Oklahoma Press, Norman, 1941.
9.
For an extremely interesting biography of Coke, see BowenCatherine Drinker, The Lion and the Throne, Little, Brown & Co., Boston, 1957.
10.
Dr. Bonham's Case, 8 Co. 118a (1610).
11.
Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrath, Attorney General, et al., 341 U.S. 123, 179 (1951).
12.
Malinski v. New York, 324 U.S. 401, 414 (1944).
13.
WatsonAndrew S., “Family Law and Its Challenge for Psychiatry,”Journal of Family Law, Vol. II, Fall 1962, p. 82.
14.
HayekFriedrich A., The Road to Serfdom, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1944, p. 79.
15.
For several examples, including the law of infants, bankruptcy legislation, homestead exemptions, water rights, etc., see JonesHarry W., The Rule of Law in the Welfare State, Essays on Jurisprudence from the Columbia Law Review, Columbia University Press, New York, 1963, pp. 400 and 408.
16.
See HutchinsRobert M., The Two Faces of Federalism, Center for Study of Democratic Institutions, Santa Barbara, California, 1961.
17.
See FosterHenry H.Jr., “The Relation and Correlation of Freedom and Security,”West Virginia Law Review, Vol. LVIII, June 1956, pp. 325–51.
18.
Jones, op. cit., p. 413, footnote 16.
19.
See CorwinEdward Samuel, The Higher Law Background of American Constitutional Law, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, 1955.
20.
For the most thorough sociolegal study of court congestion, see ZeiselHans, KalvenHarryJr., and BuchholzBernard, Delay in the Court, Little, Brown & Co., Boston, 1959.
21.
GellhornWalter, Children and Families in the Courts of New York City, Dodd, Mead & Co., New York, 1954, contains the study and the report of the committee.
22.
For the best recent review of New York divorce law, see BlakeNelson Manfred, Road to Reno, Macmillan Co., New York, 1962.
23.
tenBroekJacobus, “The Impact of Welfare Law Upon Family Law,”California Law Review, Vol. XLII, July 1954, p. 459.
24.
tenBroekJacobus, “The Impact of Welfare Law Upon Family Law,”California Law Review, Vol. XLII, July 1954, p. 460.
25.
See FosterHenry H.Jr., and FreedDoris J., “Child Custody” (scheduled for publication in the New York University Law Review).
26.
Finlay v. Finlay, 240 N.Y. 429, 148 N.E. 624 (1925) and Chapsky v. Wood, 26 Kan. 650, 40 Am. Rep. 321 (1881).
27.
See SimpsonHelen, “The Unfit Parent,”University of Detroit Law Journal, Vol. XXXIX, February 1962, pp. 347–92.
28.
See KatzSanford N., “The Lawyer and the Caseworker: Some Observations,”Social Casework, Vol. XLII, January 1961, pp. 10–15.
29.
For the story of the Salt Lake City fiasco, see BodenheimerBrigitte M., “The Utah Marriage Counseling Experiment,”Utah Law Review, Vol. VII, Fall 1961, pp. 443–77.
30.
BrandeisLouis D., “The Living Law,”Illinois Law Review, Vol. X, February 1916, p. 470.
31.
MasonAlpheus Thomas, Harlan Fiske Stone: Pillar of the Law, Viking Press, New York, 1956, p. 379.
32.
For a biography of this remarkable man, see GibbMildred Ann, John Lilburne, the Leveller, a Christian Democrat, Lindsay Drummond, London, 1947; see also Wolfram, “John Lilburne, Democracy's Pillar of Fire,” Syracuse Law Review, Vol. III, 1952, p. 213, and Alan Barth, “The Levellers and Civil Liberties,” Civil Liberties, No. 214, March 1964.
33.
Sheldon, and GlueckEleanor, Unraveling Juvenile Delinquency, Commonwealth Fund, New York, 1950 (distributed by Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts), p. vi.