See PollakOtto, and BrielandDonald, “The Midwest Seminar on Family Diagnosis and Treatment,”Social Casework, Vol. XLII, July 1961, pp. 319–24.
2.
See FriesMargaret E., and WoolfPaul J., “Some Hypotheses on the Role of the Congenital Activity Type in Personality Development,” in The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, Vol. VIII, International Universities Press, New York, 1953, pp. 50–51, 55.
3.
PollakOtto, “Worker Assignment in Casework with Marriage Partners,”Social Service Review, Vol. XXXVII, March 1963, pp. 47–48.
4.
See MittelmannBela, “Complementary Neurotic Reactions in Intimate Relationships,”Psychoanalytic Quarterly, Vol. XIII, October 1944, pp. 482–83; René Spitz, “Familienneurose und neurotische Familie,” Internationale Zeitschrift für Psychoanalyse, Vol. XXIII, No. 4, 1937, pp. 548–60; Martin Grotjahn, Psychoanalysis and the Family Neurosis, W. W. Norton & Co., New York, 1960, pp. 119–23.
5.
See DashiellJohn Frederick, Fundamentals of General Psychology, Houghton Mifflin Co., 1949, Chapter 16, pp. 443–76, and Gardner Murphy, Personality, Harper & Brothers, 1947, pp. 331–61.
6.
See ScherzFrances H., “Multiple-Client Interviewing: Treatment Implications,”Social Casework, Vol. XLIII, March 1962, p. 122.
7.
WaelderRobert, Basic Theory of Psychoanalysis, International Universities Press, New York, 1960, pp. 107–108.
8.
BatesonGregory, “Formal Research in Family Structure,” in Exploring the Base for Family Therapy, AckermanNathan W., BeatmanFrances L., and ShermanSanford N. (eds.), Family Service Association of America, New York, 1961, pp. 136–40.
9.
Dashiell, op. cit., p. 449.
10.
See PollakOtto, “Treatment of Character Disorders: A Dilemma in Casework Culture,”Social Service Review, Vol. XXXV, June 1961, pp. 127–34.