See A Guide to Classification of Professional Positions and Evaluation Outlines in a Family Service Agency, Family Service Association of America, New York, 1957, and “Classification Plan & Procedures & Levels,” in Personnel Policies, Family Service Association of Cleveland, Cleveland, 1961.
2.
See “Classification Plan & Procedures & Levels,”op. cit.
3.
AptekarHerbert H., “The Significance of Dependence and Independence in Supervision,”Social Casework, Vol. XXXV, May 1954, pp. 238–45; Lucille N. Austin, “An Evaluation of Supervision,” Social Casework, Vol. XXXVII, October 1956, pp. 375–82; Sidney J. Berkowitz, “The Administrative Process in Casework Supervision,” Social Casework, Vol. XXXIII, December 1952, pp. 419–23; Fred Berl, “An Attempt to Construct a Conceptual Framework for Supervision,” Social Casework, Vol. XLI, July 1960, pp 339–46; Administration, Supervision, and Consultation: Papers from the 1954 Social Welfare Forum, National Conference of Social Work, Family Service Association of America, New York, 1955, especially Jeanette Hanford, “Integration of the Teaching and Administrative Aspects of Supervision,” pp. 51–58, and Charlotte S. Henry, “Criteria for Determining Readiness of Staff To Function Without Supervision ” pp. 34–45; Arthur L. Leader, “New Directions in Supervision,” Social Casework, Vol. XXXVIII, November 1957, pp. 462–68; Frances H. Scherz, “A Concept of Supervision Based on Definitions of Job Responsibility,” Social Casework, Vol. XXXIX, October 1958, pp. 435–43; “Supervision Committee Report (Caseworkers III and IV),” Family Service Association of Cleveland, Cleveland, 1959; Techniques of Student and Staff Supervision, reprinted from Social Casework, 1950–1953, Family Service Association of America, New York; Corinne H. Wolfe, “Basic Components in Supervision,” in The Social Welfare Forum, 1958, Columbia University Press, New York, 1958, pp. 177–89.
4.
McGregorDouglas, The Human Side of Enterprise, McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, 1960.
5.
AronsonAlbert H., “Human Dynamics in Administration,”Social Work Journal, Vol. XXXI, July 1950, pp. 117–21, 143; Bertram J. Black, “Tools and Techniques of Administration,” Social Casework, Vol. XXXI, June 1950, pp. 223–29, and “Some Aspects of Professional Administration,” Social Casework, Vol. XXXI, October 1950, pp. 326–32; Marshall E. Dimock, A Philosophy Of Administration Toward Creative Growth, Harper & Brothers, New York, 1958; Samuel Mencher, “Evaluating Productivity in Social Casework,” Social Work, Vol. V, April 1960, pp. 79–83; Wayne Vasey, “Partnership Between Administrator and Staff in Developing Sound Welfare Programs,” Social Casework, Vol. XXXIII, April 1952, pp. 135–40.
6.
See “Report of Committee on Method and Content of Supervision of Caseworker I & II,”Family Service Association of Cleveland, Cleveland, 1959.
7.
“First Jackson Memorial Institute—1961,”Family Service Association of Cleveland, Cleveland, 1961.
8.
“Impressions of the Content of the Conferences of Mr. Utz and Mr. Kruse with the Caseworker Upper III's and IV's,”Family Service Association of Cleveland, Cleveland, 1961.
9.
ArgyrisChris, Personality and Organization, Harper & Brothers, New York, 1957; Peter F. Drucker, The Practice of Management, Harper & Brothers, New York, 1954; Richard E. Farson, “Praise Reappraised,” Harvard Business Review, Vol. XLI, September–October 1963, pp. 61–66; Robert L. Katz, 1960, pp. 80–102; S. B. Miles, Jr., and T. E. Vail, “Thinking Ahead: Dual Management,” Harvard Business Review, Vol. XXXVIII, January–February 1960, pp. 27, 30, 149–54; O. A. Ohmann, “Search for a Managerial Philosophy,” Harvard Business Review, Vol. XXXV, September–October 1957, pp. 41–51; C. B. Olmstead, “Some Management Principles of Staffing Social Welfare Organizations,” Social Work, Vol. VI, July 1961, pp. 22–28; William Foote Whyte, “Human Relations Theory—A Progress Report,” Harvard Business Review, Vol. XXXIV; September–October 1956, pp. 125–32; William Foote Whyte, Man and Organization, Richard D. Irwin, Homewood, Illinois, 1959.
