SidneyAxelrad, JohnFrings, and ElizabethHerzog, A Study of Short-Term Cases, Jewish Family Service, New York, 1951 (mimeographed). (See # 8 for published summary.)
2.
MargaretBlenkner, “Predictive Factors in the Initial Interview in Family Casework,” Social Service Review, Vol. XXVIII, No. 1 (1954), pp. 65–73.
3.
MargaretBlenkner and McVHunt J., and KoganLeonard S., “A Study of Interrelated Factors in the Initial Interview with New Clients,” SOCIAL CASEWORK, Vol. XXXII, No. 1 (1951), pp. 23–30 (a summary of # 4).
4.
Margaret and McVHunt J., and KoganLeonard S., A Study of Intake: New Cases Coming to Family Service during March, 1947, Community Service Society, New York, 1950 (mimeographed). (See # 3 for published summary.)
5.
ColemanJules V., M.D., RuthJanowicz, StephenFleck, M.D., and NeaNorton, “A Comparative Study of a Psychiatric Clinic and a Family Agency,” SOCIAL CASEWORK, Vol. XXXVIII, Nos. 1 and 2 (1957), pp. 3–8, 74–80.
6.
ElizabethCoyle, and others, A Study of Brief Services, Family and Children's Agency, San Francisco, 1955 (mimeographed.)
7.
Follow-up Study of Brief-Service Cases, Family Service Association, Indianapolis, 1955 (mimeographed). (See # 9 for published summary.)
8.
JohnFrings, “What about Brief Services?—A Report of a Study of Short-Term Cases,” SOCIAL CASEWORK, Vol. XXXII, No. 6 (1951), pp. 236–241 (summary of # 1).
9.
GrahamHenry M., and BlumenthalDavid L., “Why We Failed—As Clients See It,” FAMILY SERVICE HIGHLIGHTS, Vol. XVI, No. 6 (1955), pp. 91–94 (summary of # 7).
10.
JonesHelen R., A Study of 117 Cases Which Did Not Continue Beyond a Single In-Person Interview, Minneapolis, 1954 (mimeographed).
11.
Report on Study of One-Client-Interview Cases, Family Service Association, Cleveland, 1952 (mimeographed).
12.
LilianRipple, “Motivation, Capacity and Opportunity as Related to the Use of Casework Service: Theoretical Base and Plan of Study,” Social Service Review, Vol. XXIX, No. 2 (1955), pp. 172–193.
13.
LilianRipple and ErnestinaAlexander, “Motivation, Capacity and Opportunity as Related to the Use of Casework Service: Nature of Client's Problem,” Social Service Review, Vol. XXX, No. 1 (1956), pp. 38–54.
14.
LilianRipple and ErnestinaAlexander, “Factors Associated with Continuance in Casework Service,” Social Work, Vol. II, No. 1 (1957), pp. 87–94.
15.
SchwartzDulcine M., “A Study of 86 One In-Person Interview Cases,” Smith College Studies in Social Work, Vol. XXIII, No. 1 (1952), pp. 5–32.
16.
ShyneAnn W., Short Contact Cases in Family Service Agencies, Family Service Association of America, New York, 1948 (mimeographed).
17.
Study of Short-Time Cases Closed with Five or Less Interviews, Family Service, Cincinnati, 1952 (mimeographed).