Mobile dating apps have transformed how men who have sex with men (MSM) in the United States find partners, offering convenience but also raising unique safety risks. This qualitative study explores the perceptions of 18 self-identified MSM users, aged 18–56, residing primarily in New York, with participants also from Washington, California, New Jersey, and Florida. Employing an integrated approach methodology with open-ended survey questions, this research identifies key themes, including concerns about deceptive practices, criminal activities, erratic behaviors, substance use, mental health challenges, and meeting in unfamiliar environments. Findings highlight how MSM navigate these risks and adopt protective strategies such as profile screening and cautious offline meeting practices. This study underscores the compounded vulnerabilities MSM face due to societal stigma and their increased reliance on online platforms. Implications suggest the need for app developers to enhance safety features, public health initiatives to address risks, and informed interventions for clinicians to support MSM in safely accessing digital spaces. These findings contribute to the broader understanding of online dating app use and safety concerns among marginalized populations, laying the groundwork for future research and intervention design.
BabcockN.ZarateJ.WangS.WatsonR. J.EatonL. A.SnappS. D. (2024). How LGBTQ+ young adults navigate personal risk in app-based hookups: The safety spectrum theory. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 53(6), 2347–2359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-024-02864-y
2.
BadalH. J.StrykerJ. E.DeLucaN.PurcellD. W. (2018). Swipe right: Dating website and app use among men who have sex with men. AIDS and Behavior, 22(4), 1265–1272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-017-1882-7
3.
BineauL.LambertD.TruszczynskiN.HansenN.LaucknerC. (2021). Dating app use among rural men who have sex with men and its relationship to HIV prevention and risk behaviors: A mixed-methods analysis. Rural and Remote Health, 21(2), 6556. https://doi.org/10.22605/RRH6556
4.
BraudW.AndersonR. (1998). Transpersonal research methods for the social sciences: Honoring human experience. Sage.
5.
CarragherD. J.RiversI. (2002). Trying to hide: A cross-national study of growing up for non-identified gay and bisexual male youth. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 7(3), 457–474. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359104502007003040
6.
CastleberryA.NolenA. (2018). Thematic analysis of qualitative research data: Is it as easy as it sounds?Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 10(6), 807–815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2018.03.019
7.
CastroÁ.BarradaJ. R. (2020). Dating apps and their sociodemographic and psychosocial correlates: A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(18), 6500. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186500
8.
ChanR. C. H. (2023). Benefits and risks of LGBT social media use for sexual and gender minority individuals: An investigation of psychosocial mechanisms of LGBT social media use and well-being. Computers in Human Behavior, 139, 107531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107531
9.
ChinbunchornT.ThaneeratN.HowellS.SowapruxT.PhiphatkunarnonP.LujintanonS.KaewpoowatQ.PhanuphakP.PhanuphakN.RamautarsingR. A. (2022). Assessment of U=U understanding, prep awareness, HIV risk behaviours and factors associated with low HIV knowledge among users of Hornet, an online dating application for LGBTQ, in Thailand. Sexually Transmitted Infections, 99(1), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2021-055300
10.
ChoiE. P.WongJ. Y.FongD. Y. (2018). An emerging risk factor of sexual abuse: The use of smartphone dating applications. Sexual Abuse, 30(4), 343–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063216672168
DietzelC. (2021a). “That’s straight-up rape culture”: Manifestations of rape culture on Grindr. In BaileyJ.FlynnA.HenryN. (Eds.), The Emerald international handbook of technology-facilitated violence and abuse (pp. 351–368). https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83982-848-520211026
13.
DietzelC. (2021b). The three dimensions of unsolicited dick pics: Men who have sex with men’s experiences of sending and receiving unsolicited Dick Pics on dating apps. Sexuality; Culture, 26(3), 834–852. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-021-09920-y
14.
DonkohS. (2023). Application of triangulation in qualitative research. Journal of Applied Biotechnology & Bioengineering, 10(1), 6–9. https://doi.org/10.15406/jabb.2023.10.00319
15.
DuncanZ.MarchE. (2019). Using tinder® to start a fire: Predicting antisocial use of tinder® with gender and the dark tetrad. Personality and Individual Differences, 145, 9–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.03.014
16.
FinkelE. J.EastwickP. W.KarneyB. R.ReisH. T.SprecherS. (2012). Online dating: A critical analysis from the perspective of psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(1), 3–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612436522
17.
FullerC. M.MarettK.TwitchellD. P. (2012). An examination of deception in virtual teams: Effects of deception on task performance, mutuality, and Trust. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 55(1), 20–35. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpc.2011.2172731
18.
GaiaA. (2020). Social desirability bias and sensitive questions in surveys. In AtkinsonP.DelamontS.CernatA.SakshaugJ. W.WilliamsR. A. (Eds.), SAGE research methods foundations (pp. 4539–4545). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526421036928979
19.
GerenaC. E.Vega-CabreraJ. M. (2024). Incorporating intersectionality in Social Work Practice: A necessary approach to working with Hispanic Sexual Minority men. Journal of Ethnic & Cultural Diversity in Social Work, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/15313204.2024.2411230
20.
Gewirtz-MeydanA.Volman-PampanelD.OpudaE.TarshishN. (2024). Dating Apps: A new emerging platform for sexual harassment? A scoping review. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 25(1), 752–763. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380231162969
21.
GilesC.AshfordC.BrownK. J. (2022). Online safety and identity: Navigating same-sex male social “dating” apps and Networks. Information & Communications Technology Law, 31(3), 269–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600834.2022.2088061
22.
GrovC.BreslowA. S.NewcombM. E.RosenbergerJ. G.BauermeisterJ. A. (2014). Gay and bisexual men’s use of the internet: Research from the 1990s through 2013. The Journal of Sex Research, 51(4), 390–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2013.871626
23.
HeijmanT.StolteI.GeskusR.MatserA.DavidovichU.XiridouM.Schim van der LoeffM. (2016). Does online dating lead to higher sexual risk behaviour? A cross-sectional study among MSM in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. BMC Infectious Diseases, 16(1), Article 288. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-016-1637-5
24.
HorvathK. J.BowenA. M.WilliamsM. L. (2006). Virtual and physical venues as contexts for HIV risk among rural men who have sex with men. Health Psychology, 25(2), 237–242. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.25.2.237
25.
IsanoS.YohannesT.IgihozoG.NdatinyaG. I.WongR. (2023). A qualitative study to explore the healthcare-seeking experiences of men who have sex with men (MSM) and Transgender Women (TGW) in Rwanda. BMC Health Services Research, 23(1), Article 291. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09286-x
LaucknerC.TruszczynskiN.LambertD.KottamasuV.MeherallyS.Schipani-McLaughlinA. M.TaylorE.HansenN. (2019). “Catfishing,” cyberbullying, and coercion: An exploration of the risks associated with dating app use among rural sexual minority males. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Mental Health, 23(3), 289–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/19359705.2019.1587729
28.
LehmillerJ. J.IoergerM. (2014). Social networking smartphone applications and sexual health outcomes among men who have sex with men. PLOS ONE, 9(1), Article e86603. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0086603
29.
LemkeR.WeberM. (2017). That man behind the curtain: Investigating the sexual online dating behavior of men who have sex with men but hide their same-sex sexual attraction in offline surroundings. Journal of Homosexuality, 64(11), 1561–1582. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2016.1249735
30.
LloydN.HyettN.KennyA. (2024). To member check or not to member check? An evaluation of member checking in an interpretive descriptive study. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 23, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069241301383
31.
MadillA.SullivanP. (2018). Mirrors, portraits, and member checking: Managing difficult moments of knowledge exchange in the social sciences. Qualitative Psychology, 5(3), 321–339 . https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000089
32.
Marqués-SánchezP.Bermejo-MartínezD.Quiroga SánchezE.Calvo-AyusoN.Liébana-PresaC.Benítez-AndradesJ. A. (2022). Men who have sex with men: An approach to social network analysis. Public Health Nursing, 40(1), 73–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/phn.13138
33.
McKieR. M. (2015). “Just say yes”—Sexual consent and boundary setting on- and offline: An international perspective of men of varying sexual orientations [Master’s thesis]. Trent University Graduate Thesis Collection.
MillerB. (2015). “They’re the modern-day gay bar”: Exploring the uses and gratifications of social networks for men who have sex with men. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 476–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.023
36.
MotulskyS. L. (2021). Is member checking the gold standard of quality in qualitative research?Qualitative Psychology, 8(3), 389–406. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000215
37.
Muñoz-FernándezN.Sánchez-JiménezV.Rodríguez-deArribaM.Nacimiento-RodríguezL.ElipeP.Del ReyR. (2022). Traditional and cyber dating violence among adolescents: Profiles, prevalence, and short-term associations with peer violence. Aggressive Behavior, 49(3), 261–273. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.22069
38.
MurphyA. (2018). Dating dangerously: Risks lurking within mobile dating apps. Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology, 26(1), 100. https://scholarship.law.edu/jlt/vol26/iss1/7
39.
OrellanaC. B.LyerlaJ.MartinA.MilnerF. (2024). Sexually transmitted infections and dating app use. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 21(3), 3999–4035. https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2024177
PhanA.Seigfried-SpellarK.ChooK.-K. R. (2021). Threaten me softly: A review of potential dating App Risks. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 3, 100055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2021.100055
43.
RamirezA.Bryant SumnerE. M.FleurietC.ColeM. (2014). When online dating partners meet offline: The effect of modality switching on relational communication between online daters. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20(1), 99–114. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12101
44.
RosserB. R.OakesJ. M.HorvathK. J.KonstanJ. A.DanilenkoG. P.PetersonJ. L. (2009). HIV sexual risk behavior by men who use the internet to seek sex with men: Results of the men’s internet sex study-II (Mints-II). AIDS and Behavior, 13(3), 488–498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-009-9524-3
45.
ScheerJ. R.BreslowA. S.EspositoJ.PriceM. A.KatzJ. (2021). Violence against gay men. In LundE. M.BurgessC.JohnsonA. J. (Eds.), Violence against LGBTQ+ persons (pp. 135–148). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52612-2_10
46.
StoicescuM.RughinisC. (2021). Perils of digital intimacy. A classification framework for privacy, security, and safety risks on dating apps [Conference session]. 2021 23rd International Conference on Control Systems and Computer Science (CSCS). https://doi.org/10.1109/cscs52396.2021.00081
47.
SweeneyB. N. (2014). Masculine status, sexual performance, and the sexual stigmatization of women. Symbolic Interaction, 37(3), 369–390. https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.113
VandeweerdC.MyersJ.CoulterM.YalcinA.CorvinJ. (2016). Positives and negatives of online dating according to women 50. Journal of Women & Aging, 28(3), 259–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/08952841.2015.1137435
52.
VeelK.ThylstrupN. B. (2018). Geolocating the stranger: The mapping of uncertainty as a configuration of matching and warranting techniques in dating apps. Journal of Aesthetics and Culture, 10(3), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004214.2017.1422924
53.
WagenaarB. H.SullivanP. S.StephensonR. (2012). HIV knowledge and associated factors among internet-using men who have sex with men (MSM) in South Africa and the United States. PLOS ONE, 7(3), Article e32915. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032915
54.
WaldmanA. E. (2019). Law, privacy, and online dating: “Revenge porn” in gay online communities. Law & Social Inquiry, 44(4), 987–1018. https://doi.org/10.1017/lsi.2018.29
55.
WangH.ZhangL.ZhouY.WangK.ZhangX.WuJ.WangG. (2018). The use of geosocial networking smartphone applications and the risk of sexually transmitted infections among men who have sex with men: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health, 18(1), Article 1178. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-6092-3
56.
XuJ.YuH.TangW.LeubaS. I.ZhangJ.MaoX.WangH.GengW.JiangY.ShangH. (2018). The effect of using geosocial networking apps on the HIV incidence rate among men who have sex with men: Eighteen-month prospective Cohort Study in Shenyang, China. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 20(12), Article e11303. https://doi.org/10.2196/11303
57.
YeoT. E.NgY. L. (2016). Sexual risk behaviors among apps-using young men who have sex with men in Hong Kong. AIDS Care, 28(3), 314–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2015.1093597
58.
ZhouY. (2023). The benefits and dangers of online dating apps. Canadian Journal of Family and Youth / Le Journal Canadien de Famille et de La Jeunesse, 15(2), 54–62. https://doi.org/10.29173/cjfy29872
59.
ZlotorzynskaM.WohlfeilerD.SanchezT. H. (2024). Increases in awareness and uptake of dating apps’ sexual health features among US men who have sex with men, 2018 to 2021. AIDS and Behavior, 28(9), 2829–2835. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-024-04349-4
