Family violence strains family relationships and cultural ties. A family group approach strengthens these relationships by centering the family, their relatives, and close supports in safeguarding all members. Risk-averse jurisdictions, however, may prohibit the practice, and workers may hesitate to invite the children. Such responses diminish the opportunity for adults to be inspired by the children to act and for children to gain participatory competence and pride in their family. To support the involvement of family, this article offers strategies shaped to local settings. Reaching into their extensive experience of family group conferences or circles in child welfare, the authors overview inclusive practices in four diverse places: Aotearoa New Zealand, United Kingdom, Mi’kmaq in Canada, and Israel.
AllanH.RauktisM. E.PennellJ.Merkel-HolguinL.CramptonD. (2021). Family meetings as system reform to address disproportionality and disparities. In DettlaffA. J. (Ed.), Racial disproportionality and disparities in the child welfare system (pp. 309–338). Springer. https://doi:org/10.1007/978-3-030-54314-3_16
2.
AraiL.ShawA. R. G.FederG.HowarthE.MacmillanH. L.MooreT.StanleyN.GregoryA. (2021). Hope, agency, and the lived experience of violence: A qualitative systematic review of children’s perspectives on domestic violence and abuse. Trauma, Violence, and Abuse, 22, 427–438. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838019849582
3.
ArchibaldB. P.LlewellynJ. J. (2006). The challenges of institutionalizing comprehensive restorative justice: Theory and practice in Nova Scotia. Dalhousie Law Journal, 29(2), 297–343.
4.
ArmstrongL.BallesterosX.BrownR.FisherT.HornerA.NixonP.PennellJ.SaundersS. (2023, October). Relational health and the family group conference [Conference session]. A Call to Action to Change Child Welfare, Kempe Center International, Aurora, CO.
5.
AsadullahM.AbramsonA.PastranX. H.FulksJ. (2023). Indigenous justice and restorative justice: Exploring perceptions of convergence and divergence in British Columbia and Saskatchewan. The International Journal of Restorative Justice, 6(2), 235–256. https://doi.org/10.5553/TIJRJ.000146
6.
BasqueK. (2023). Wikimanej Kikmanaq—Family circles as an authentic experience for Mi’kmaw families. In PennellJ. (Ed.), A restorative approach to family violence: Feminist kin-making (pp. 101–107). Routledge. https://doi.org:10.4324/9781003105374
7.
BenitahH. (2021). Perceptions of service providers in Israel on the implementation of family group conference (FGC) [Master’s thesis, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem]. https://nevetgreenhouse.huji.ac.il/kedem-project
8.
BraithwaiteJ. (2002). Restorative justice and responsive regulation. Oxford University Press.
9.
BrownL. (2003). Mainstream or margin? The current use of family group conferences in child welfare practice in the UK. Child & Family Social Work, 8(4), 331–340. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2206.2003.00293.x
10.
BrownL. (2007). The adoption and implementation of a service innovation in a social work setting: A case study of family group conferencing in the UK. Social Policy and Society: A Journal of the Social Policy Association, 6(3), 321–332. https://doi.org/10.1017/S147474640700365X
11.
CameronA. (2006). Stopping the violence: Canadian feminist debates on restorative justice and intimate violence. Theoretical Criminology, 10(1), 49–66. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1362480606059982
12.
CénatJ. M.McInteeS.MukunziJ. N.NoorishadP. (2021). Overrepresentation of Black children in the child welfare system: A systematic review to understand and better act. Children and Youth Services Review, 120, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105714105714
13.
CollinsP. H. (1986). Learning from the outsider within: The sociological significance of Black feminist thought. Social Problems, 33(6), S14–S32.
DoveB.FisherT.PurchaseE. (2021). Ever-widening circles: The emergence of reciprocity in the Camden Village and the (re)generative nature of community. In de RooA.JagtenbergR. (Eds.), Family group conference research: Reflections and ways forward (pp. 1–176). Eleven International.
16.
FeatherstoneB.WhiteS.MorrisK. (2014). Re-imagining child protection: Towards humane social work with families. Bristol University Press. https://doi.org/10.46692/9781447308034
17.
GalT.Faedi DuramyB. (Eds.). (2015). International perspectives and empirical findings on child participation: From social exclusion to child-inclusive policies. Oxford University Press.
18.
GuedesA.BottS.Garcia-MorenoC.ColombiniM. (2016). Bridging the gaps: A global review of intersections of violence against women and violence against children. Global Health Action, 9(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3402/gha.v9.31516
19.
INCITE! Women of Color Against Violence. (2016). Color of violence: The INCITE! anthology. Duke University Press.
20.
InglisS. (2007). Family decision making to plan for safety in domestic violence- a practice that endangers or protects women and children? In AshleyC.NixonP. (Eds.), Family group conference, where next? Policies and practices for the future (pp. 193–219). Family Rights Group.
21.
LlewellynJ. (2012). Restorative justice: Thinking relationally about justice. In DownieJ.LlewellynJ. (Ed.), Being relational: Reflections on relational theory and health law (pp. 89–108). University of British Columbia Press. https://doi.org/10.59962/9780774821902-007
McColdP. (2006). The recent history of restorative justice: Mediation, circles, and conferencing. In SullivanD.TifftsL. (Eds.), Handbook of restorative justice (pp. 23–51). Routledge.
25.
MitchellM. (2021). The value of recognition theory to family group conferencing and child-care and protection. The British Journal of Social Work, 51(6), 2191–2209. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcaa207
26.
MizrahiL. (2021). The parent’s perception of Family Group Conference (FGC) in relation to the relationship with the coordinator, the welfare system and the supporters, the degree of the child’s risk and the quality of the planned family plan [Master’s thesis, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem]. https://nevetgreenhouse.huji.ac.il/kedem-project
NajensonR. (2022). Children’s participation in Israel. In PennellJ.BasqueK.InglisS.MoragT.NajensonR. (Eds.), Children’s participation and family violence. Interactive Workshop at A Call to Action to Change Child Welfare. Kempe Center International.
29.
NancarrowH. (2010). Restorative justice for domestic and family violence: Hopes and fears of Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australian women. In PtacekJ. (Ed.), Restorative justice and violence against women (pp. 123–149). Oxford University Press.
NettletonC.StrangH. (2018). Face-to-face restorative justice conferences for intimate partner abuse: An exploratory study of victim and offender views. Cambridge Journal of Evidence-based Policing, 2, 125–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41887-018-0028-0
32.
NixonP. (2014). Ma Matou Ma Tatou—Working together to change young lives: Where to next with child protection in New Zealand. In HaydenA.GelsthorpeL.KingiV.MorrisA. (Eds.), A restorative approach to family violence: Changing tack (pp. 41–52). Ashgate.
33.
NixonP.BurfordG.QuinnA.EdelbaumJ. (2005). A survey of international practices, policy and research on family group conferencing and related practices. National Center on Family Group Decision Making, American Humane. https://frg.org.uk/family-group-conferences/fgc-research/
PennellJ.Allen-EckardK.LatzM.TomlinsonC. (2019). Children’s hopes and converging family and state networks of regulation. In BurfordG.BraithwaiteJ.BraithwaiteV. (Eds.), Restorative and responsive human services (pp. 100–115). Taylor & Francis; Routledge.
37.
PennellJ.BurfordG. (2000). Family group decision making: Protecting children and women. Child Welfare, 79(2), 131–158.
38.
PennellJ.BurfordG.SassonE.PackerH.SmithE. L. (2021). Family and community approaches to intimate partner violence: Restorative programs in the United States. Violence Against Women, 27(10), 1608–1629. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801220945030
RobertsD. (2019). Black mothers, prison, and foster care: Rethinking restorative justice. In BurfordG.BraithwaiteJ.BraithwaiteV. (Eds.), Restorative and responsive human services (pp. 116–126). Taylor & Francis; Routledge.
41.
SenR.WebbC. (2019). Exploring the declining rates of state social work intervention in an English local authority using family group conferences. Children and Youth Services Review, 106, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104458
42.
ShaibeJ. (2022, September). The perceptions and agentic practices of “Family Group Conference (FGC)” coordinators in Israel (Olim LaDerech—KEDEM Program) [Master’s thesis, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem]. https://nevetgreenhouse.huji.ac.il/kedem-project
43.
ShermanL. W.StrangH.BarnesG.WoodsD. J.BennettS.InkpenN.Newbury-BirchD.RossnerM.AngelC.MearnsM.SlothowerM. (2015). Twelve experiments in restorative justice: The Jerry Lee program of randomized trials of restorative justice conferences. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 11(4), 501–540. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-015-9247-6
44.
SijtsemaJ. J.StolzE. A.BogaertsS. (2020). Unique risk factors of the co-occurrence between child maltreatment and intimate partner violence perpetration. European Psychologist, 25(2), 122–133. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000396
45.
Social Services and Research Information Unit. (2003, June). The Dove Project: The Basingstoke domestic violence family group conference project [Unpublished manuscript]. University of Portsmouth.
46.
TaylorS.BlackshawE.LawrenceH.SternD.GilbertL.RaghooN. (2023). Randomised controlled trial of family group conferencing at pre-proceedings stage. Coram Group, Foundations, What Works Centre for Children & Families. https://frg.org.uk/family-group-conferences/fgc-research/
van BerkelS. R.PrevooM. J. L.LintingM.PannebakkerF. D.AlinkL. R. A. (2020). Prevalence of child maltreatment in the Netherlands: An update and cross-time comparison. Child Abuse & Neglect, 103, 104439–104439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104439
49.
VillacampaC. (2021). Spanish criminal policy and the state pact on gender violence: A critical assessment. SN Social Sciences, 1(5), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-021-00141-6
50.
WalgraveL. (2021). Being consequential about restorative justice. Eleven.
51.
WienF.GlodeJ. (2011). Evaluating family group conferencing in a First Nation setting: An example of university-First Nation child welfare agency collaboration. In LéveilléS.TrocméN.BrownI.ChamberlandC. (Eds.), Research-community partnerships in child welfare (pp. 139–154). Centre of Excellence for Child Welfare. www.cecw-cepb.ca
52.
WoodS.ScourfieldJ.Man AuK.EvansR.Jones-WillamsD.LuggWidgerF.McCormackE.MeindlM.PallmannP.RoblingM.SchroederE.-A.PetrouS.WilkinsD. (2022, December). A UK-wide survey of family group conference provision [Conference session]. CASCADE: Children’s Social Care Research and Development Centre, Cardiff University. https://cascadewales.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2022/12/CASCADE-Family-VOICE-survey-findings.pdf
