Restorative justice (RJ) has been applied to intimate partner violence (IPV) cases, but some question whether RJ is appropriate for IPV. This review is the first to focus on qualitative research on how RJ is interpreted and used in IPV cases in the United States. Six articles met the inclusion criteria. Findings indicated that RJ is used with the criminal legal system (CLS), initiated by the victim, and is not community-oriented. Concerns for victims being harmed or retraumatized were not supported in RJ processes happening in relation to the CLS, with some providers highlighting the importance of facilitation training and techniques. Additional research is needed to explore RJ processes and their relationship to the CLS for IPV.
AndruczykM. (2015). Intimate partner violence: Restorative justice and trauma-informed care. Columbia Social Work Review. https://doi.org/10.7916/D8SF2VFK
2.
AtkinsS.LewinS.SmithH.EngelM.FretheimA.VolminkJ. (2008). Conducting a meta-ethnography of qualitative literature: Lessons learnt. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(21), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-21
BarocasB.AvieliH.ShimizuR. (2020). Restorative justice approaches to intimate partner violence: A review of interventions. Partner Abuse, 11(3), 318–349. https://doi.org/10.1891/PA-2020-0010
5.
BarthR. P.JiranekH. C. (2023). Strengthening relationships between couples to respond to domestic violence: A commentary on policy changes needed to support this evolution. Journal of Family Violence, 38(4), 761–774.
6.
BehrensJ. (2005). Meeting the needs of victims of domestic violence with family law issues: The dangers and possibilities in restorative justice. International Journal of Law in Context, 1(3), 215–235. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744552305003010
7.
BillingsleyA. D. (2019). Reimagining gender violence: Understanding community-based organizations’ use of restorative and transformative justices as social change strategies. University of Miami.
8.
BolithoJ.BruceJ. (2017). Science, art and alchemy: Best practice in facilitating restorative justice. Contemporary Justice Review, 20(3), 336–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/10282580.2017.1348896
9.
BondasT.HallE. O. (2007). Challenges in approaching metasynthesis research. Qualitative Health Research, 17(1), 113–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732306295879
10.
BonomiA. E.TrabertB.AndersonM. L.KernicM. A.HoltV. L. (2014). Intimate partner violence and neighborhood income: A longitudinal analysis. Violence Against Women, 20(1), 42–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801213520580
11.
BradshawW.RoseboroughD.UmbreitM. S. (2006). The effect of victim offender mediation on juvenile offender recidivism: A meta-analysis. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 24(1), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.159
CheonA.RegehrC. (2006). Restorative justice models in cases of intimate partner violence: Reviewing the evidence. Victims & Offenders, 1(4), 369–394. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564880600934138
16.
CissnerA.SassonE.Thomforde HauserR.PackerH.PennellJ.SmithE.DesmaraisS.BurfordG. (2019). A national portrait of restorative approaches to intimate partner violence. The Center for Court Innovation.
17.
CokerD. K. (1999). Enhancing autonomy for battered women: Lessons from Navajo peacemaking. UCLA Law Review, 47(1), 1–112. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2638905
18.
CollinsP. H. (2019). Intersectionality as critical social theory. Duke University Press.
19.
CondonM. (2010). Bruise of a different color: The possibilities of restorative justice for minority victims of domestic violence. Georgetown Journal on Poverty Law & Policy, 17(3), 487–506.
20.
CrenshawK. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039
21.
CreswellJ. W.MillerD. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice, 39(3), 124–130. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1477543
FáveroM.CruzN.MoreiraD.Del CampoA.Sousa-GomesV. (2023). Violence in intimate relationships: Symptomatology and motivation for change. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 1. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001471
25.
*FulkersonA. (2001). The use of victim impact panels in domestic violence cases: A restorative justice approach. Contemporary Justice Review, 4, 355–368.
26.
GumzE. J.GrantC. L. (2009). Restorative justice: A systematic review of the social work literature. Families in Society, 90(1), 119–126. https://doi.org/10.1606/1044-3894.3853
27.
HannesK.MacaitisK. (2012). A move to more systematic and transparent approaches in qualitative evidence synthesis: Update on a review of published papers. Qualitative Research, 12, 402–442. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794111432992
28.
HoodB. J.GastonS. (2022). How families respond to the collateral consequences of incarceration and prisoner reentry. Family Relations, 71(3), 1175–1190. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12616
29.
*KerriganK. S.MankowskiE. S. (2021a). How surrogate impact panels function in the context of intimate partner violence: A mixed-methods study. Victims & Offenders, 16(1), 50–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2020.1764427
30.
*KerriganK. S.MankowskiE. S. (2021b). Multiple perspectives on how intimate partner violence surrogate impact panels affect abusive partners. Violence Against Women, 29(3–4), 726–751. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778012211058221
31.
KimM. E. (2018). From carceral feminism to transformative justice: Women-of-color feminism and alternatives to incarceration. Journal of Ethnic & Cultural Diversity in Social Work, 27(3), 219–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/15313204.2018.1474827
32.
LachalJ.Revah-LevyA.OrriM.MoroM. R. (2017). Metasynthesis: An original method to synthesize qualitative literature in psychiatry. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 8, 269. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00269
33.
LeemisR. W.FriarN.KhatiwadaS.ChenM. S.KresnowM.SmithS. G.CaslinS.BasileK. C. (2022). The national intimate partner and sexual violence survey: 2016/2017 report on intimate partner violence. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
34.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
35.
*MillerS. L.HefnerM. K.IovanniL. (2020). Practitioners’ perspectives on using restorative justice with crimes of gendered violence. Contemporary Justice Review, 23(1), 65–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/10282580.2019.1700372
36.
MillerS. L.IovanniL. (2013). Using restorative justice for gendered violence: Success with a postconviction model. Feminist Criminology, 8(4), 247–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085113490781
37.
MoherD.LiberatiA.TetzlaffJ.AltmanD. G., & PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLOS MEDICINE, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
PaezA. (2017). Gray literature: An important resource in systematic reviews. Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 10(3), 233–240. https://doi.org/10.1111/jebm.12265
41.
PageM. J.McKenzieJ. E.BossuytP. M.BoutronI.HoffmannT. C.MulrowC. D.ShamseerL.TetzlaffJ. M.AklE. A.BrennanS. E.ChouR.GlanvilleJ.GrimshawJ. M.HróbjartssonA.LaluM. M.LiT.LoderE. W.Mayo-WilsonE.McDonaldS.. . .MoherD. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, 71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
42.
PennellJ.BurfordG.SassonE.PackerH.SmithE. L. (2021). Family and community approaches to intimate partner violence: Restorative programs in the United States. Violence Against Women, 27(10), 1608–1629. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801220945030
SaulnierA.SivasubramaniamD. (2015). Restorative justice: Underlying mechanisms and future directions. New Criminal Law Review, 18(4), 510–536. https://doi.org/10.1525/nclr.2015.18.4.510
45.
SchmidD. J. (2003). Restorative justice: A new paradigm for criminal justice policy. Victoria University of Wellington Law Review, 34(1), 91–133.
46.
SharplessL.KershawT.WillieT. C. (2022). Associations between state-level restorative justice policies and mental health among women survivors of intimate partner violence. SSM-Mental Health, 2, 100085.
47.
StockmanJ. K.HayashiH.CampbellJ. C. (2015). Intimate partner violence and its health impact on ethnic minority women [corrected]. Journal of Women’s Health, 24(1), 62–79. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2014.4879
48.
TracyS. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837–851. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410383121
49.
UmbreitM.ArmourM. P. (2011). Restorative justice dialogue: An essential guide for research and practice. Springer.
WolfM.LyU.HobartM.KernicM. (2003). Barriers to seeking police help for intimate partner violence. Journal of Family Violence, 18, 121–129. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022893231951
52.
WormerK. V. (2009). Restorative justice as social justice for victims of gendered violence: A standpoint feminist perspective. Social Work, 54(2), 107–116. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/54.2.107
53.
ZakheimS. F. (2011). Healing circles as an alternative to batterer intervention programs for addressing domestic violence among Orthodox Jews. Partner Abuse, 2(4), 484–496. https://doi.org/10.1891/1946-6560.2.4.484
54.
ZinsstagE.AertsenI.WalgraveL.Fonseca RosenblattF.ParmentierS. (2018). The International Journal of Restorative Justice: New horizons for independent research and development. International Journal of Restorative Justice, 1(1), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.5553/IJRJ/258908912018001001001
55.
ZoskyD. (2016). I feel your pain: Do batter intervention programs impact perpetrator’s empathy for victims?Partner Abuse, 7(1), 70–86. https://doi.org/10.1891/1946-6560.7.1.70
56.
*ZoskyD. (2018). “Walking in her shoes”: The impact of victim impact panels on perpetrators of intimate partner violence. Victims & Offenders, 13(6), 739–756. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2018.1468370
