The use of simulation (i.e., trained actors) has gained much attention in social work as a method of teaching, learning, and student assessment. Simulation has also been used in medicine as a research method in studying practice competencies. The use of simulation as a part of research design is relatively new in social work. Particularly, little is known about how simulations can be combined with well-established qualitative research methods. We posit that simulation can further advance qualitative research on social work practice, which requires a highly complex set of skills that are procedural, cognitive, affective, and relational. Drawing from two study examples, we propose guidelines for how simulations can be incorporated in qualitative research on complex practice competencies essential for enhancing the quality of health and social services.
ArchibaldM. M.AmbagtsheerR. C.CaseyM. G.LawlessM. (2019). Using Zoom videoconferencing for qualitative data collection: Perceptions and experiences of researchers and participants. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1609406919874596
2.
AronsonJ.HemingwayD. (2011). Competence in neoliberal times: Defining the future of social work. Canadian Social Work Review, 28(2), 281–285. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41669949
3.
AsakuraK. (2023). Towards a critical approach to simulation-based social work education: Guidelines for designing simulated client case scenarios. Journal of Social Work Education. Advance online publication, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2023.2203213
4.
AsakuraK.BogoM. (2021). The use of simulation in advancing clinical social work education and practice. Clinical Social Work Journal, 49(2), 111–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-021-00810-2
5.
AsakuraK.GheorgheR.BorgenS.SewellK.MacDonaldH. (2020). Using simulation as an investigative methodology in researching competencies of clinical social work practice: A scoping review. Clinical Social Work Journal, 49(2), 231–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-020-00772-x
6.
AsakuraK.GheorgheR.TarshisS.OcchiutoK. (2023). Translating critical social work into clinical practice: A pilot simulation-based study from Canada. Smith College Studies in Social Work. Advance online publication, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00377317.2023.2221353
7.
BainesD. (2017). Doing anti-oppressive practice: Social justice social work (3rd ed.). Fernwood Publishing.
8.
BaskinC.DaveyC. (2017). Parallel pathways to decolonization: Critical and indigenous social work. In WehbiS.ParadaH. (Eds.), Reimagining anti-oppression social work practice (pp. 3–16). Canadian Scholars’ Press.
9.
BayU.MaghidmanM.WaughJ.ShlonskyA. (2021). Guidelines for using simulation for online teaching and learning of clinical social work practice in the time of COVID. Clinical Social Work Journal, 49, 128–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-021-00807-x
10.
BeullensJ.RethansJ. J.GoedhuysJ.BuntinxF. (1997). The use of standardized patients in research in general practice. Family Practice, 14(1), 58–62. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/14.1.58
BogoM. (2018). Social work practice: Integrating concepts, processes & skills (2nd ed.). Columbia University Press.
13.
BogoM.KatzE.RegehrC.LogieC.MylopoulosM.TuffordL. (2013). Toward understanding meta-competence: An analysis of students’ reflection on their simulated interviews. Social Work Education, 32(2), 259–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2012.738662
14.
BogoM.MishnaF.RegehrC. (2011). Competency frameworks: Bridging education and practice. Canadian Social Work Review, 28(2), 275–279. https://hdl.handle.net/1807/95575
15.
BogoM.RawlingsM.KatzE.LogieC. (2014). Using simulation in assessment and teaching: OSCE adapted for social work. CSWE Press.
16.
BrownC. (2021). Critical clinical social work and the neoliberal constraints on social justice in mental health. Research on Social Work Practice, 31(6), 644–652. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731520984531
17.
CampbellC. (2011). Competency-based social work: A unitary understanding of our profession. Canadian Social Work Review, 28(2), 311–315. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41669954
18.
Chandra-MouliV.LenzC.AdebayoE.LungrenI. L.GarberoL. G.ChatterieeS. (2018). A systematic review of the use of adolescent mystery clients in assessing the adolescent friendliness of health services in high, middle, and low-income countries. Global Health Action, 11(1), 1536412. https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2018.1536412
19.
CharmazK. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage.
ClarkeJ.PonG.BenjaminA.BaileyA. (2015). Ethnicity, race, oppression, and social work: The Canadian case. In WrightJ. D. (Ed.) International Encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (2nd ed., pp. 152–156). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.28107-5
CreswellJ. W.CreswellJ. D. (eds.) (2018). Research questions and hypotheses. In Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage.
25.
DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (2008). Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials. Sage.
26.
DerryS.PeaR.BarronB.EngleR.EricksonF.GoldmanR.. . .SherinB. L. (2010). Conducting video research in the learning sciences: Guidance on selection, analysis, technology, and ethics. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(1), 3–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400903452884
27.
DominelliL. (2002). Feminist social work theory and practice. Palgrave Macmillan.
EricksonF. (2012). Definition and analysis of data from videotape: Some research procedures and their rationales. In GreenJ. L.CamilliG.ElmoreP. B. (Eds.), Handbook of complementary methods in education research (pp. 177–192). Routledge.
30.
FookJ. (2011). The politics of competency debates. Canadian Social Work Review/Revue Canadienne De Service Social, 28(2), 295–298. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41669951
31.
FookJ.RyanM.HawkinsL. (2000). Professional expertise: Practice, theory and education for working in uncertainty. Whiting & Birch.
32.
GuiseJ.HansenM.LambertW.O’BrienK. (2017). The role of simulation in mixed-methods research: A framework and application to patient safety. BMC Health Services Research, 17(1), Article 322. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2255-7
33.
HalamekL. P. (2013). Simulation as a methodology for assessing the performance of healthcare professionals working in the delivery room. Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, 18(6), 369–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.siny.2013.08.010
34.
HartM.SinclairR.BruyereG. (2009). Wicihitowin: Aboriginal social work in Canada. Fernwood Publishing.
HillockS.MuleN. (2016). Queering social work education. UBC Press.
37.
JosephA. J. (2021). Simulating the other in social work pedagogy: Pathologising the oppressed through neoliberal/colonial practice teaching. The British Journal of Social Work, 51(4), 1408–1424. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcab048
38.
Kennedy-Kish (Bell)B.SinclairR.CarniolB.BainesD. (2017). Case critical: Social services and social justice in Canada (7th ed.). Between the Lines Press.
LobeB.MorganD.HoffmanK. A. (2020). Qualitative data collection in an era of social distancing. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1609406920937875
44.
LogieC. H.BogoM.KatzE. (2015). “I didn’t feel equipped”: Social work students’ reflections on a simulated client “coming out.”Journal of Social Work Education, 51(2), 315–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2015.1012946
45.
MullalyB. (2010). Challenging oppression and confronting privilege: A critical social work approach (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
National Association of Social Workers. (2021b). Undoing racism through social work: NASW report to the profession on racial justice priorities.
48.
O’BrienG.CarterK. A. E.SwankeJ. R. (2018). The utility of simulated clients in macro-practice courses. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 38(5), 551–568. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841233.2018.1526245
49.
OcchiutoK.SewellK.AsakuraK. (2022). Pivoting to online live-streamed simulations: Students’ experiences in clinical social work education. Journal of Social Work Education. Advance online publication, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2022.2089306
50.
RegehrC.BirzeA. (2021). Use of simulation methods in social work research on clinical decision-making. Clinical Social Work Journal, 49, 244–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-020-00778-5
51.
RegehrC.BoberT. (2005). In the line of fire: Trauma in the emergency services. Oxford University Press.
52.
RegehrC.BogoM.LeBlancV. R.BairdS.PatersonJ.BirzeA. (2016). Suicide risk assessment: Clinicians’ confidence in their professional judgment. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 21(1), 30–46. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1080/15325024.2015.1072012
53.
RegehrC.BogoM.ShlonskyA.LeBlancV. (2010a). Confidence and professional judgment in assessing children’s risk of abuse. Research on Social Work Practice, 20(6), 621–628. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1049731510368050
54.
RegehrC.LeBlancV. R.ShlonskyA.BogoM. (2010b). The influence of clinicians’ previous trauma exposure on their assessment of child abuse risk. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 198(9), 614–618. https://doi.org/10.1097/NMD.0b013e3181ef349e
55.
RegehrC.LeBlancV. R.BogoM.PatersonJ.BirzeA. (2015). Suicide risk assessments: Examining influences on clinicians’ professional judgment. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 85(4), 295–301. https://doi.org/10.1037/ort0000075
56.
RobbinsS. P.Coe ReganJ. A. R.WilliamsJ. H.SmythN. J.BogoM. (2016). From the editor—The future of social work education. Journal of Social Work Education, 52(4), 387–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2016.1218222
57.
RossiterA.HeronB. (2011). Neoliberalism, competencies, and the devaluing of social work practice. Canadian Social Work Review, 28(2), 305–309. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41669953
58.
SewellK. M.SandersJ. E.KourgiantakisT.KatzE.BogoM. (2020). Cognitive and affective processes: MSW students’ awareness and coping through simulated interviews. Social Work Education, 40(5), 641–655. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2020.1727875
59.
SiminoffL. A.RogersH. L.WallerA. C.Harris-HaywoodS.EspteinR. M.Borrell CarrioF.. . .LongoD. R. (2011). The advantages and challenges of unannounced standardized patients methodology to assess healthcare communication. Patient Education and Counseling, 82(3), 318–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.021
60.
StokesJ.SchmidtG. (2012). Child protection decision making: A factorial analysis using case vignettes. Social Work, 57(1), 83–90. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/swr007
61.
ToddS.OcchiuntoK.AsakuraK.GrassauP. (2021). Navigating uncertainty in clinical social work practice: A simulation-based study. Clinical Social Work Journal, 49(2), 286–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-021-00800-4
62.
VemuriS.HysonJ.GillamL.WilliamsK. (2020). Simulation-based research: A scoping review. Qualitative Health Research, 30(14), 2351–2360. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973232094689
63.
WashburnM.ZhouS.SampsonM.PalmerA. (2021). A pilot study of peer-to-peer SBIRT simulation as a clinical telehealth training tool during COVID-19. Clinical Social Work Journal, 49, 136–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-021-00799-8
64.
WatsonM. C.NorrisP.GranasA. G. (2006). A systematic review of the use of simulated patients and pharmacy practice research. International Journal of Pharmacy Practice, 14, 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijpp.12570
YeeJ. Y.DumbrillG. C. (2016). Whiteout: Still looking for race in Canadian social work practice. In Al-KrenawiA.GrahamJ. R.HabibovN. (eds.), Diversity and social work in Canada (pp. 13–37). Oxford University Press.
