Despite home visiting’s established legacy, the potential influence of intersecting parental characteristics on parent–worker relationships is less understood. This study examines the main and interaction effects of parents’ demographic characteristics on positive relationships with workers in home visiting and compares whether and how these effects differ between fathers and mothers. This study analyzed 130 mothers and 180 fathers who participated in home visiting services. Immigrant status was a significant predictor of positive worker relationships for mothers and fathers, whereas ethnicity was only significant for fathers. Interaction analyses indicated that U.S.-born Hispanic/Latinx fathers faced greater challenges in building positive worker relationships than their foreign-born counterparts. These findings highlight the importance of developing gender-specific and culturally responsive strategies to enhance parent–worker relationships.
Al-FahamH.DavisA. M.ErnstR. (2019). Intersectionality: From theory to practice. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 15(1), 247–265.
2.
American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.).
3.
AstutoJ.AllenL. (2009). Home visitation and young children: An approach worth investing in?Society for Research in Child Development, 23(4), 3–23.
4.
Azzi-LessingL. (2011). Home visitation programs: Critical issues and future directions. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 26(4), 387–398.
5.
BellamyJ. L.BanmanA.HartyJ. S.Mirque-MoralesS.JaccardJ.GutermanN. B. (2023). The Effect of Dads Matter–HV on Father Engagement in Home Visiting Services. Prevention Science, 24(1), 137–149.
6.
BellamyJ.PhillipsJ. D.SpeerS. R.HartyJ. S.BanmanA.GutermanN. B.Morales-MirqueS. (2022). Strategies to enhance father engagement in home visiting: Results from a qualitative study of Dads Matter-HV. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1086/720010
7.
BergersenM.KlarS.SchmittE. (2018). Intersectionality and engagement among the LGBTQ+ community. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 39(2), 196–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554477x.2018.1449527
8.
BowerK. M.NimerM.WestA. L.GrossD. (2020). Parent involvement in maternal, infant, and early childhood home visiting programs: An integrative review. Prevention Science, 21(5), 728–747.
9.
BowlegL. (2012). The problem with the phrase women and minorities: Intersectionality—An important theoretical framework for public health. American Journal of Public Health, 102(7), 1267–1273. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2012.300750
10.
BrassartE.PrévostC.BétriseyC.LemieuxM.DesmaraisC. (2017). Strategies developed by service providers to enhance treatment engagement by immigrant parents raising a child with a disability. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 26(4), 1230–1244.
11.
BridgesA. J.DuewekeA. R. (2020). Behavioral health service delivery with Latinos. In BenutoL. T.GonzalezF. R.SingerJ. (Eds.), Handbook of cultural factors in behavioral health (pp. 163–176). Springer International Publishing.
12.
CabreraN.ChenY.AlonsoA.WestJ.FaganJ. (2021). Latino parents report positive co-parenting and parent-child interactions that vary by gender and nativity. The National Research Center for Hispanic Children and Families.
13.
CasillasK. L.FauchierA.DerkashB. T.GarridoE. F. (2016). Implementation of evidence-based home visiting programs aimed at reducing child maltreatment: A meta-analytic review. Child Abuse & Neglect, 53, 64–80.
14.
ChoJ.TerrisD. D.GlissonR. E.BaeD.BrownA. (2017). Beyond family demographics, community risk influences maternal engagement in home visiting. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 26(11), 3203–3213.
15.
DurtschiJ. A.SoloskiK. L.KimmesJ. (2017). The dyadic effects of supportive coparenting and parental stress on relationship quality across the transition to parenthood. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 43(2), 308–321.
16.
FalicovC. J. (2010). Changing constructions of machismo for Latino men in therapy: “The devil never sleeps.”Family Process, 49(3), 309–329.
17.
FifeS. T.WhitingJ. B.BradfordK.DavisS. (2014). The therapeutic pyramid: A common factors synthesis of techniques, alliance, and way of being. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 40(1), 20–33.
18.
FurmanR.NegiN. J.IwamotoD. K.RowanD.ShukraftA.GraggJ. (2009). Social work practice with Latinos: Key issues for social workers. Social Work, 54(2), 167–174.
19.
HayesA. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.
20.
KarbergE.GuzmanL.CookE.ScottM.CabreraN. (2017). A portrait of Latino fathers: Strengths and challenges. National Research Center of Hispanic Children and Families.
21.
KivlighanD. M.HooleyI. W.BrunoM. G.EthingtonL. L.KeetonP. M.SchreierB. A. (2019). Examining therapist effects in relation to clients’ race-ethnicity and gender: An intersectionality approach. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 66(1), 122–129.
22.
KnerrM.Bartle-HaringS.McDowellT.AdkinsK.DelaneyR. O.GangammaR.GelbovaT.GrafskyE.MeyerK. (2011). The impact of initial factors on therapeutic alliance in individual and couples therapy. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 37(2), 182–199.
23.
LiangB.TracyA.TaylorC. A.WilliamsL. M.JordanJ. V.MillerJ. B. (2002). The relational health indices: A study of women’s relationships. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26(1), 25–35.
24.
ManuelT. (2006). Envisioning the possibilities for a good life: Exploring the public policy implications of intersectionality theory. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 28, 173–203.
25.
MastenA. S. (2015). Ordinary magic: Resilience in development. The Guilford Press.
26.
MillerJ. B.StriverI. (1998). The healing connection: How women form relationships in therapy and in life (HooksT., Ed.). Beacon Press.
27.
O’BrienR. A.MoritzP.LuckeyD. W.McClatcheyM. W.IngoldsbyE. M.OldsD. L. (2012). Mixed methods analysis of participant attrition in the nurse-family partnership. Prevention Science, 13(3), 219–228.
28.
Ouellet-PlamondonC.RousseauC.NicoleL.Abdel-BakiA. (2015). Engaging immigrants in early psychosis treatment: A clinical challenge. Psychiatric Services, 66(7), 757–759.
29.
ParisM.Jr.AñezL. M.BedregalL. E.Andrés-HymanR. C.DavidsonL. (2005). Help seeking and satisfaction among Latinas: The roles of setting, ethnic identity, and therapeutic alliance. Journal of Community Psychology, 33(3), 299–312.
30.
PettyJohnM. E.TsengC. F.BlowA. J. (2020). Therapeutic utility of discussing therapist/client intersectionality in treatment: When and how? Family Process, 59(2), 313–327.
31.
PorterR.KetringS. (2011). Contributing factors in the therapeutic alliance. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 10(3), 201–214.
32.
PuthusseryS.ChutiyamiM.TsengP. C.KilbyL.KapadiaJ. (2018). Effectiveness of early intervention programs for parents of preterm infants: A meta-review of systematic reviews. BMC Pediatrics, 18(1), 1–18.
33.
RienksS. L.WadsworthM. E.MarkmanH. J.EinhornL.EtterE. M. (2011). Father involvement in urban low-income fathers: Baseline associations and changes resulting from preventative intervention. Family Relations, 60, 191–204.
34.
RoggmanL. A.CookG. A.PetersonC. A.RaikesH. H. (2008). Who drops out of early head start home visiting programs?Early Education and Development, 19(4), 574–599.
35.
Salas-WrightC. P.ClarkT. T.VaughnM. G.CórdovaD. (2015). Profiles of acculturation among Hispanics in the United States: Links with discrimination and substance use. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 50(1), 39–49.
36.
SarachoO. N.SpodekB. (2008). Challenging the stereotypes of Mexican American fathers. Enduring Bonds, 35, 57–72.
37.
StargelL. E.FauthR. C.GoldbergJ. L.EasterbrooksM. (2020). Maternal engagement in a home visiting program as a function of fathers’ formal and informal participation. Prevention Science, 21(4), 477–486.
38.
WallingS. M.SuvakM. K.HowardJ. M.TaftC. T.MurphyC. M. (2012). Race/ethnicity as a predictor of change in working alliance during cognitive behavioral therapy for intimate partner violence perpetrators. Psychotherapy, 49(2), 180–189.
