Despite the meteoric rise of social media, little is known about how clinical social workers and other mental health professionals respond to this new form of communication. This study used classic (Glaserian) grounded theory methodology to explore the experiences and concerns of mental health professionals on social networking websites such as Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn. The main concern that emerged out of research interviews with 26 mental health professionals was a loss of control over others’ perceptions and the loss of ability to compartmentalize the different parts of identities associated with personal and professional selves. Participants resolved these concerns through the author-identified basic social process of “managing digital identities.” This study highlights practice implications for professionals as they manage online identity.
American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. https://www.apa.org/ethics/code
4.
BaierA. (2019). The ethical implications of social media: Issues and recommendations for clinical practice. Ethics & Behavior, 29(5), 341–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2018.1516148
5.
boydd. (2002). Faceted id/entity: Managing representation in a digital world [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
6.
boydd.HeerJ. (2006, January). Profiles as conversation: Networked identity performance on Friendster [Conference session]. Proceedings of the Hawai’i International Conference on System Sciences, Kauai, HI, United States.
7.
BrattW. (2010). Ethical considerations of social networking for counsellors. Canadian Journal of Counselling and Psychology, 44(4), 335–345.
8.
BreckenridgeJ.JonesD. (2009, June). Demystifying theoretical sampling in grounded theory research. The Grounded Theory Review: An International Journal, 2(8). http://groundedtheoryreview.com/2009/06/30/847/
9.
BrownC. B. (2002). Acompañar: A grounded theory of developing, maintaining, and assessing relevance in professional helping [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Houston.
10.
CharmazK. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY.S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 509–535). SAGE.
GlaserB. G.StraussA. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine Publishing.
20.
GoffmanE. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Doubleday.
21.
HoganB. (2010). The presentation of self in the age of social media: Distinguishing performances and exhibitions online. Bulletin of Science Technology & Society, 30(6), 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467610385893
22.
HullG.LipfordH.LatulipeC. (2011). Contextual gaps: Privacy issues on Facebook. Ethics and Information Technology, 13(4), 289–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-010-9224-8
23.
MeadG. H. (1964). George Herbert Mead on social psychology: Selected papers (StraussA., Ed.). The University of Chicago Press.
24.
MorseJ. M. (1999, January). Editorial: Qualitative generalizability. Qualitative Health Research, 9(1), 5–6.
WittkowerD. E. (2014, April). Facebook and dramauthentic identity: A post-Goffmanian model of identity performance on SNS. First Monday: Peer Reviewed Journal on the Internet, 19(4). http://firstmonday.org/article/view/4858/3875
ZurO.LehavortK.WilliamsM. H.KnappS. (2009). Psychotherapist self-disclosure and transparency in the internet age. Professional Psychology, 40(1), 22–30. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014745
