Environmental justice organizations aim to secure an equitable distribution of environmental resources through the participation and self-determination of affected people, particularly communities of color. Yet organizing in a market economy is complicated: As communities become greener, gentrification can follow, thereby inadvertently displacing low-income communities of color and reproducing environmental injustices. This study informs antiracist community practice methods by examining strategic and ethical dilemmas embedded within an environmental justice organization that is located in a gentrifying Mexican American neighborhood in Chicago. Drawing from interviews, we examine members’ perceptions relating to representation, recruitment, and issue selection. We reveal key considerations for community organizations and residents as they work to promote environmental equity without contributing to the marginalization or displacement of communities of color.
AndersonM.SternbergC. (2013). “Non-white” gentrification in Chicago’s Bronzeville and Pilsen: Racial economy and the intraurban contingency of urban redevelopment. Urban Affairs Review, 49, 435–467.
2.
AnguelovskiI. (2016). From toxic sites to parks as (green) LULUs? New challenges of inequity, privilege, gentrification, and exclusion for urban environmental justice. Journal of Planning Literature, 31, 23–36.
3.
AnguianoC.MilsteinT.De LarkinI.ChenY. W.SandovalJ. (2012). Connecting community voices: Using a Latino/a critical race theory lens on environmental justice advocacy. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 5(2), 124–143.
BetancurJ.KimY. (2016). The trajectory and impact of ongoing gentrification in Pilsen. Voorhees Center for Neighborhood and Community Improvement White Paper.
9.
BoboK. A.KendallJ.MaxS. (2001). Organizing for social change: Midwest Academy manual for activists. Seven Locks Press.
10.
BradyH. E.VerbaS.SchlozmanK. L. (1995). Beyond SES: A resource model of political participation. American Political Science Review, 89(2), 271–294.
11.
BradyS. R.O’ConnorM. K. (2014). Understanding how community organizing leads to social change: The beginning development of formal practice theory. Journal of Community Practice, 22(1–2), 210–228.
12.
BryantB.MohaiP. (Eds.). (1992). Race and the incidence of environmental hazards: A time for discourse. Westview.
13.
BullardR. D. (1996). Environmental justice: It’s more than waste facility siting. Social Science Quarterly, 77, 493–499.
14.
BurghardtS. (1982). The other side of organizing: Resolving the personal dilemmas and political demands of daily practice. Schenkman Books.
15.
CheckerM. (2011). Wiped out by the greenwave: Environmental gentrification and the paradoxical politics of urban sustainability. City and Society, 23, 210–229.
CreswellJ. W.MillerD. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory Into Practice, 39, 124–130.
18.
CurranW. (2018). “Mexicans love red” and other gentrification myths: Displacements and contestations in the gentrification of Pilsen, Chicago, USA. Urban Studies, 55, 1711–1728.
19.
DaleA.NewmanL. L. (2009). Sustainable development for some: Green urban development and affordability. Local Environment, 14, 669–681.
20.
DavidsonM.LeesL. (2005). New-build “gentrification” and London’s riverside renaissance. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 37(7), 1165–1190. https://doi.org/10.1068/a3739
21.
DeFilippisJ.FisherR.ShraggeE. (2010). Contesting community: The limits and potential of local organizing. Rutgers University Press.
22.
DiazW. A. (1996). Latino participation in America: Associational and political roles. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 18(2), 154–174.
23.
DobbieD.Richards-SchusterK. (2008). Building solidarity through difference: A practice model for critical multicultural organizing. Journal of Community Practice, 16(3), 317–337.
24.
DoolingS. (2009). Ecological gentrification: A research agenda exploring justice in the city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 33(3), 621–639.
25.
EmersonR. M.FretzR. I.ShawL. L. (2011). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. University of Chicago Press.
26.
First National People of Color Environmental Leadership Summit. (1991). The principles of environmental justice (EJ). https://www.ejnet.org/ej/principles.pdf
27.
FreidusA. (2016, March). “A great school benefits us all”: Advantaged Parents and the gentrification of an urban public school. Urban Education, 54(8), 1121–1148.
28.
FulliloveM. T. (2001). Root shock: The consequences of African American dispossession. Journal of Urban Health, 78, 72–80.
29.
GambleD. N.WeilM. (2009). Community practice skills: Local to global perspectives. Columbia University Press.
30.
GibbsL. (2002). Citizen activism for environmental health: The growth of a powerful new grassroots health movement. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 584, 97–109.
31.
GutiérrezL. M. (1997). Multicultural community organizing. In ReischM.GambrillE. (Eds.), Social Work in the 21st century (pp. 249–259). SAGE.
32.
GutiérrezL. M.AlvarezA.NemonH.LewisE. (1996). Multicultural community organizing: A strategy for change. Social Work, 41, 501–508.
33.
JonesD. N.TruellR. (2012). The global agenda for social work and social development: A place to link together and be effective in a globalized world. International Social Work, 55, 454–472.
34.
KempS. P.PalinkasL. A.MasonL. R. (2018). Create social responses to a changing environment. In FongR.LubbenJ.BarthR. (Eds.), Grand challenges for social work and society (pp. 140–160). Oxford University Press.
KernL.KovesiC. (2018). Environmental justice meets the right to stay put: Mobilising against environmental racism, gentrification, and xenophobia in Chicago’s Little Village. Local Environment, 23, 952–966.
37.
KringsA.KornbergD.LaneE. (2019). Organizing under austerity: How residents’ concerns became the Flint water crisis. Critical Sociology, 45(4–5), 583–597.
LevyJ. I.SpenglerJ. D.HlinkaD.SullivanD.MoonD. (2002). Using CALPUFF to evaluate the impacts of power plant emissions in Illinois: Model sensitivity and implications. Atmospheric Environment, 36, 1063–1075.
MartinL. (2007). Fighting for control: Political displacement in Atlanta’s gentrifying neighborhoods. Urban Affairs Review, 42, 603–628.
42.
McKinnonJ. (2008). Exploring the nexus between social work and the environment. Australian Social Work, 61, 256–268.
43.
MedoffP.SklarH. (1994). Streets of hope: The fall and rise of an urban neighborhood. South End Press.
44.
MohaiP.PellowD.RobertsJ. T. (2009). Environmental justice. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 34, 405–430.
45.
PezzulloP. C.SandlerR. (2007). Introduction: Revisiting the environmental justice challenge to environmentalism. In SandlerR.PezzulloP. C. (Ed.), Environmental justice and environmentalism: The social justice challenge to the environmental movement (pp. 1–25). Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
RigolonA.NémethJ. (2018). “We’re not in the business of housing”: Environmental gentrification and the nonprofitization of green infrastructure projects. Cities, 81, 71–80.
50.
RiveraF. G.ErlichJ. L. (1998). Community organizing in a diverse society (3rd ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
51.
RowanA. (2013). EPA completes cleanup of former lead smelter site in Pilsen. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
52.
SchlosbergD. (2007). Defining environmental justice: Theories, movements, and nature. Oxford University Press.
53.
StaplesL. (2004). Roots to power: A manual for grassroots organizing (2nd ed.). Praeger.
54.
SwyngedouwE. (2007). Impossible “sustainability” and the postpolitical condition. In KruegerR.GibbsD. (Eds.), The sustainable development paradox (pp. 13–40). Guilford Press.
55.
TaylorD. E. (2014). The state of diversity in environmental organizations. Green 2.0.
56.
TeixeiraS.KringsA. (2015). Sustainable social work: An environmental justice framework for social work education. Social Work Education, 34(5), 513–527.
57.
TeixeiraS.MathiasJ.KringsA. (2019). The future of environmental social work: Looking to community initiatives for models of prevention. Journal of Community Practice, 27, 414–429.
58.
ThurberA.KringsA.MartinezL. S.OhmerM. (2019). Resisting gentrification: The theoretical and practice contributions of social work. Journal of Social Work. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017319861500
59.
WalkerL. A.InceD.Riphenburg-ReeseA.LittmanJ. (2018). Predicting resident involvement in neighborhood and voluntary groups in a Latino/Latina neighborhood undergoing transit-oriented development and gentrification. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 47, 1135–1154.
60.
WilsonD.WoutersJ.GrammenosD. (2004). Successful protect-community discourse: Spatiality and politics in Chicago’s Pilsen neighborhood. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 36, 1173–1190.
61.
YinR. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). SAGE.
62.
YoungI. M. (2012). Five faces of oppression. In DeFilippisJ.SaegertS. (Eds.), The community development reader (2nd ed., pp. 270–290). Routledge.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
