This article provides an overview of the systematic review and the meta-analysis. These tools provide a comprehensive picture of current research. What follows is an abridged explanation of each of these techniques. This approach is intended to provide a fundamental overview for social work practitioners, so that they may more readily access important research, while minimizing the time spent doing so.
CohenJ. (1998). Statistical power analysis for behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Academic Press.
3.
CooperH. (2017). Research synthesis and meta-analysis (5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
4.
MoherD.TetzlaffJ.AltmanD. G., & The PRISMA Group (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
5.
OfmanJ. J.SullivanS. D.NeumannP. J.ChiouC. F.HenningJ. M.WadeS. W.HayJ. W. (2003). Examining the value and quality of health economic analyses: Implications for utilizing the QHES. Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy, 9, 53-61.
6.
SarteschiC. M.VaughnM. G.KimK. (2011). Assessing the effectiveness of mental health courts: A quantitative review. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39, 12-20.
7.
SteketeeG.RossA. M.WachmanM. K. (2017). Health outcomes and costs of social work services: A systematic review. American Journal of Public Health, 103, S256-S266
