Domestic minor sex trafficking (DMST) is the commercial sexual exploitation of a minor American citizen or permanent resident within the United States. It is a human rights abuse and carries significant consequences for victims’ psychological, physical, and social health. To interrupt DMST victimization patterns, it is important for researchers and advocates to fully understand how victims’ vulnerabilities are exploited by different people in their lives, but investigations of DMST victim–trafficker relationships are largely unexplored in the literature. The purpose of this cross-sectional path analysis of archival data, therefore, is to explore the influence of victims’ unmet basic needs on their victimization within specific types of DMST relationships. The results of this study suggest that unmet basic needs may play less of a role in influencing victim–trafficker relationship type than might be hypothesized based upon broader understandings of human trafficking vulnerability.
ArmstrongD.GoslingA.WeinmanJ.MarteauT. (1997). The place of inter-rater reliability in qualitative research: An empirical study. Sociology, 31, 597-606. doi:10.1177/0038038597031003015
2.
BaronR. M.KennyD. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
3.
BernsteinE. (2010). Militarized humanitarianism meets carceral feminism: The politics of sex, rights, and freedom in contemporary antitrafficking campaigns. Signs, 36, 45-71. doi:10.1086/652918
4.
BernsteinE. (2012). Carceral politics as gender justice? The “traffic in women” and neoliberal circuits of crime, sex, and rights. Theory and Society, 41, 233-259. doi:10.1007/s11186-012-9165-9
5.
ButlerC. N. (2015). The racial roots of human trafficking. UCLA Law Review, 62, 1464-1514.
6.
CavazosJ. (2016). The voices of domestic minors trafficked for commercial sexual exploitation within the United States: A qualitative retrospective study with a narrative approach (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. (3685051)
7.
ChohaneyM. L. (2016). Minor and adult domestic sex trafficking risk factors in Ohio. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 7, 117-141. doi:10.1086/685108
8.
ChoiK. R. (2015). Risk factors for domestic minor sex trafficking in the United States: A literature review. Journal of Forensic Nursing, 11, 66-76. doi:10.1097/JFN.0000000000000072
9.
Countryman-RoswurmK.BolinB. L. (2014). Domestic minor sex trafficking: Assessing and reducing risk. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 31, 521-538. doi:10.1007/s10560-014-0336-6
10.
DankM. (2011). The commercial sexual exploitation of children. El Paso, TX: LFB Scholarly Publishing.
11.
GallagherA. (2002). Trafficking, smuggling and human rights: Tricks and treaties. Forced Migration Review, 12(25), 8-36.
12.
GodsoeC. (2015). Punishment as protection. Houston Law Review, 52, 1313-1384.
13.
HorningA. (2013). Peeling the onion: Domestically trafficked minors and other sex work involved youth. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
14.
IacobucciD. (2012). Mediation analysis and categorical variables: The final frontier. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22, 582-594. doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2012.03.006
15.
McCoyM.K. (2017). Measurements of vulnerability to domestic minor sex trafficking: A systematic review. Journal of Human Trafficking, Published online before print October 26, 2017. doi: 10.1080/23322705.2017.1385334
16.
MarcusA.HorningA.CurtisR.SansonJ.ThompsonE. (2014). Conflict and agency among sex workers and pimps: A closer look at domestic minor sex trafficking. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 653, 225-246. doi:10.1177/0002716214521993
17.
MaslowA. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50, 370-396. doi:10.1037/h0054346
18.
OcenP. (2015). (E)racing childhood: Examining the racialized construction of childhood and innocence in the treatment of sexually exploited minors. UCLA Law Review, 62, 1586-1640.
19.
PattonM. Q. (1999). Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Services Research, 34, 1189-1208.
20.
PerkinsE. B.RuizC. (2017). Domestic minor sex trafficking in a rural state: Interviews with adjudicated female juveniles. Child & Adolescent Social Work Journal, 34, 171-180. doi:10.1007/s10560-016-0455-3
21.
PrebleK. (2016). Victims’ perception of power and identity intersections: A human trafficking experience (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. (Order number 10301638)
22.
ReidJ. A. (2010). Doors wide shut: Barriers to the successful delivery of victim services for domestically trafficked minors in a southern U.S. metropolitan area. Women & Criminal Justice, 20, 147-166. doi:10.1080/08974451003641206
23.
ReidJ. A.PiqueroA. R. (2014). Age-graded risks for commercial sexual exploitation of male and female youth. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29, 1747-1777. doi:10.1177/0886260513511535
24.
SchefferJ. (2002). Dealing with missing data. Research Letters in the Information and Mathematical Sciences, 3, 153-160.
25.
StarkE. (2009). Coercive control: The entrapment of women in personal life. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
TwisM.K.SheltonB. (2018). Systematic review of empiricism and theory in domestic minor sex trafficking research. Journal of Evidence Informed Social Work, 15(4), 432-456 doi: 10.1080/23761407.2018.1468844
28.
TwisM.K. (2019). Risk factor patterns in domestic minor sex trafficking relationships. Journal of Human Trafficking. Published online before print, June 2019. doi: 10.1080/23322705.2019.1627775
WheatonE. M.SchauerE. J.GalliT. V. (2010). Economics of human trafficking. International Migration, 48, 4, 114-141. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2435.2009.00592.x
