Given growing interest in and need for social innovation, social workers will benefit from knowing about positive deviance (PD), an approach that capitalizes on local creativity and strengths. The PD approach seeks community (or organizational) members who have developed solutions for problems with which other members struggle, despite their having similar resources and constraints. Rather than rely on professional expertise and skills to solve intractable problems in communities, the PD approach evokes a “new way of thinking” that promotes indigenous leadership and community responsibility for problems and solutions. This article outlines key components of the PD approach, describes steps for implementing PD, and discusses implications for social work.
BenjaminS.GardnerL.McHenryI. (2017). Adaptive positive deviance: Getting started: How to make big improvements through small (and maybe a few large) changes. Washington, DC: Plexus Institute.
2.
Ben-YehudaN. (1990). Positive and negative deviance: More fuel for a controversy. Deviant Behavior, 11(3), 221-243.
3.
Bisits BullenP. A. (2011). The positive deviance/hearth approach to reducing child malnutrition: Systematic review. Tropical Medicine & International Health, 16(11), 1354–1366. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3156.2011.02839.x
DodgeD. L. (1985). The over-negativized conceptualization of deviance: A programmatic exploration. Deviant Behavior, 6(1), 17-37.
6.
HackerK. (2013). Community-based participatory research. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
7.
HartmanA. (1992). In search of subjugated knowledge. Social Work, 37(6), 483-484.
8.
HeringtonM. J.van de FliertE. (2018). Positive deviance in theory and practice: A conceptual review. Deviant Behavior, 39(5), 664-678. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2017.1286194
9.
KadetzP. (2014). Positive deviance: Employing an assets-based approach to foster community agency and reduce chronic malnutrition in indigenous Guatemala. Social Development Issues, 36(3), 56-72.
10.
LeMahieuP.NordstrumL.GaleD. (2017). Positive deviance: Learning from positive anomalies. Quality Assurance in Education: An International Perspective, 25(1), 109-124. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-12-2016-0083
11.
LewisJ. (2009). Positive deviance: A case study in finding and harnessing the wisdom of organizational communities. Business Information Review, 26(4), 282-287.
PascaleR. T.SterninJ. (2005). Your company’s secret change agents. Harvard Business Review, 83(5), 72-81, 153.
14.
PascaleR.SterninJ.SterninM. (2010). The power of positive deviance: How unlikely innovators solve the world’s toughest problems. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
SpreitzerG.SonensheinS. (2004). Toward the construct definition of positive deviance. American Behavioral Scientist, 47(6), 828-847. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764203260212
19.
StoneD. (2011). Policy paradox: The art of political decision making (3rd ed.). New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.
