Abstract
The author argues for the centrality of peer review in assessing the scholarly merits of manuscripts, given considerable changes in the publication landscape that present formidable challenges for editors to solicit qualified reviewers, and seeks to convince reluctant senior faculty and scholarly practitioners to review manuscripts in their areas of expertise, contending in effect that we have a professional obligation to do so.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abbott
A.
(2008 , June 28 ). Publication and the future of knowledge . Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association of American University Presses . Retrieved from http://home.uchicago.edu/~aabbott/Papers/aaup.pdf
2.
Amsen
E.
(2014 ). What is open access? F1000 Research . Retrieved from https://blog.f1000.com/2014/04/23/what-is-open-access/
3.
Beck
J.
(2017 , March 13 ). This article won’t change your mind . The Atlantic . Retrieved from https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2017/03/this-article-wont-change-your-mind/519093/
4.
Bernard
T. S.
(2018 , August 6 ). ‘To little too late’: Bankruptcy booms among older Americans . The New York Times , p. A1 , A11. Retrieved August 6, 2018, from https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/05/business/bankruptcy-older-americans.html
5.
Binfield
P.
(2013 ). Open access megajournals—Have they changed everything? New Zealand : Creative Commons . Retrieved from https://creativecommons.org.nz/2013/10/open-access-megajournals-have-they-changed-everything/
6.
Bohannon
J.
(2013 ). Who’s afraid of peer review? Science , 342 (6154 ), 60 -65 . doi:10.1126/science.342.6154.60
7.
Caputo
R. K.
(1985 ). The role of research in the family service agency . Social Casework , 66 , 205 -212 .
8.
Carey
B.
(2018 , July 16 ). Mind: Psychology itself is under scrutiny . The New York Times . Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/16/health/psychology-studies-stanford-prison.html
9.
Carter
J.
Goldman
G.
Reed
G.
Hansel
P.
Halpern
M.
Rosenberg
A.
(2017 ). Sidelining science since day one: How the Trump administration has harmed public health and safety in its first six months . Cambridge, MA : Center for Science and Democracy at the Union of Concerned Scientists . Retrieved from https://www.ucsusa.org/sites/default/files/attach/2017/07/sidelining-science-report-ucs-7-20-2017.pdf
10.
The cost of knowledge
. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://gowers.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/elsevierstatementfinal.pdf
11.
Dumon
O.
(2013 , March 5 ). How the internet changed science research and academic publishing, creating the new research economy . Huffpost, The Blog . Retrieved from https://www.huffingtonpost.com/olivier-dumon/how-the-internet-changed_b_2405006.html
12.
Else
H.
(2017 , May 10 ). Peer review: Should we let the robots take over? Times Higher Education . Retrieved from https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/peer-review-should-we-let-robots-take-over
13.
Flaherty
C.
(2017 , January 20 ). Publishing prestige bias . Inside Higher Ed News . Retrieved from https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2017/01/20/study-suggests-top-humanities-journals-favor-research-elite-institutions
14.
Flaherty
C.
(2018 , March 2 ). Study finds evidence of institutional favoritism in academic publishing . Inside Higher Ed News . Retrieved from https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2018/03/02/study-finds-evidence-institutionalfavoritism-academic-ublishing?width=775&height=500&iframe=true
15.
Fox
M. F.
(1989 ). Disciplinary fragmentation, peer review, and the publication process . American Sociologist , 20 , 188 -191 .
16.
Guillory
J.
(2002 ). The Sokal affair and the history of criticism . Critical Inquiry , 28 , 470 -508 .
17.
Hargreaves
C.
(2018 ). Peer review: Pros and cons . Forensic Focus . Retrieved from http://www.forensicfocus.com/index.php?name=Content&pid=347
18.
Harley
D.
Acord
S. K.
(2011 ). Peer review in academic promotion and publishing: Its meaning, locus, and future . Berkeley : University of California Press . Retrieved from http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/1xv148c8
19.
Harley
D.
Acord
S. K.
Earl-Novel
S.
Lawrence
S.
King
C. J.
(2010 ). Assessing the future landscape of scholarly communication: An exploration of faculty values and needs in seven disciplines . Berkeley : University of California Press . Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/15x7385g
20.
Haug
C. J.
(2015 ). Peer-review fraud—Hacking the scientific publication process . The New England Journal of Medicine , 373 (25 ), 2393 -2395 .
21.
Havergal
C.
(2017 , June 1 ). ‘Credit for peer review’ movement scales up . Times Higher Education . Retrieved from https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/credit-for-peer-review-movement-scales-up
22.
Hermanowicz
J. C.
(2016 ). The proliferation of publishing: Economic rationality and ritualized productivity in a neoliberal era . American Sociologist , 47 , 174 -191 .
23.
Hodson
G.
(2013 , October 17 ). Facts? No thanks, I’ve got ideology . Psychology Today . Retrieved from https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/without-prejudice/201310/facts-no-thanks-i-ve-got-ideology
24.
Howard
G.
(2012 ). Peer review as boundary work . Journal of Scholarly Publishing , 43 , 322 -335 . doi:10.1353/scp.2012.0014
25.
Howard
J.
(2010 , July 26 ). Leading humanities journal debuts ‘open’ peer review, and likes it . The Chronicle of Higher Education . Retrieved from https://www.chronicle.com/article/leading-humanities-journal/123696
26.
Hughes
J.
(2016 ). Is crowdsourcing peer review the next big thing in academia? PHDSTUDIES.COM. News . Retrieved from https://www.phdstudies.com/news/Is-Crowdsourcing-Peer-Review-the-Next-Big-Thing-in-Academia-770/
27.
Kolowich
S.
(2011 , July 19 ). Killing peer review . Inside Higher Ed News . Retrieved from https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2011/07/19/debate_over_whether_social_web_sites_can_replace_peer_review?width=775&height=500&iframe=true
28.
Lundstrom
K.
Baker
W.
(2009 ). To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer’s own writing . Journal of Second Language Writing , 18 , 30 -43 . doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2008.06.002
29.
Maksimović
J.
(2011 ). The application of meta-analysis in education research . FACTA UNIVERSITATIS–Series Philosophy, Sociology, Psychology and History , 10 , 45 -55 .
30.
Martin
G.
(2018 ). Elsevier journals: Has anything changed? Retrieved from https://gowers.wordpress.com/2013/05/27/elsevier-journals-has-anything-changed/
31.
May
M.
(2016 ). An expanded approach to evaluating open access journals . Journal of Scholarly Publishing , 47 , 307 -327 . doi:10.3138/jsp.47.4.307
32.
McCook
A.
(2015 ). 64 more papers retracted for fake reviews, this time from Springer journals . Retraction Watch . Retrieved from https://retractionwatch.com/2015/08/17/64-more-papers-retracted-for-fake-reviews-this-time-from-springer-journals/
33.
McKenzie
L.
(2018 ). PLOS pushes publication before peer review . Inside Higher Ed . Retrieved from https://www.insidehighered.com/quicktakes/2018/02/08/plos-pushes-publication-peer-review?
34.
Mullligan
A.
van Rossum
J.
(2014 , November 14 ). What researchers think about the peer-review process. Who is feeling the pressure the most? Retrieved from www.elsevier.com/editors-update/story/peer-review/what-researchers-think-about-the-peer-review-process
35.
Novella
S.
(2008 ). The importance and limitations of peer-review . Science-Based Medicine . Retrieved from https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/the-importance-and-limitations-of-peer-review/
36.
Oliver
P.
(2016 ). The revolt of the reviewers: Towards fixing a broken publishing process . American Sociologist , 47 , 344 -355 . doi:10.1007/s12108-016-9319-8
37.
38.Open Science . (2018 b). Overview of the editorial process . Retrieved from http://www.openscienceonline.com/journal/reviewerguidelines?journalId=701
39.Open Science . (2018 c). Reviewer guidelines . Retrieved from http://www.openscienceonline.com/journal/reviewerguidelines?journalId=701
40.
Owens
S.
(2012 , July 23 ). Is the academic publishing industry on the verge of disruption? U.S. News & World Report . Retrieved from https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2012/07/23/is-the-academic-publishing-industry-on-the-verge-of-disruption
41.
Preston
A.
(2017 , August 9 ). The future of peer review . Scientific American . Retrieved from https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/the-future-of-peer-review/
42.
Rai
S.
(2003 ). Open source software and peer review . Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/1956706_Open_source_software_and_peer_review
43.
Reingewertz
Y.
Lutmar
C.
(2017 ). Academic in-group bias: An empirical examination of the link between author and journal affiliation . SSRN . Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2946811
44.
Reingewertz
Y.
Lutmar
C.
(2018 ). Do academic journals favor researchers from their own institutions? Harvard Business Review . Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2018/02/do-academic-journals-favor-researchers-from-their-own-institutions
45.
Rosenberg
M.
Confessore
N.
(2018 , May 15 ). Justice department and F.B.I. are investigating Cambridge Analytica . The New York Times . Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/15/us/cambridge-analytica-federal-investigation.html
46.
Ross
J.
(2018 , July 16 ). Peer review ‘works against’ early career researchers . Times Higher Education . Retrieved from https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/peer-review-works-against-early-career-researchers
47.SAGE . (2018 a). Get credit for your reviews . Retrieved from https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/get-credit-for-your-reviews
48.SAGE . (2018 b). Journals/conference . Retrieved from https://publons.com/journal/?publisher=64&partner=1
49.
Sciullo
N. J.
(2015 ). Must we all be beholden to peer review? On the advantages and disadvantages of the law review model for rhetorical scholarship . The Review of Communication , 15 (2 ), 102 -121 . doi:10.1080/15358593.2015.1044019
50.
Smith
L. Z.
(2005 ). [Review of the book Editorial peer review: Its strengths and weaknesses by A.C. Weller ]. Journal of Information Ethics , 14 (Fall ), 81 -84 .
51.SpotOn . (2017 ). What might peer review look like in 2030? A report from BioMed Central and Digital Science . doi: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.4884878. Retrieved from http://events.biomedcentral.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/SpotOn_Report_PeerReview-1.pdf
52.Springer . (2018 ). Peer review . Retrieved from https://www.springer.com/gp/authors-editors/editors/peer-review/32888
53.
Stanglin
D.
Korte
G.
(2017 , April 22 ). Marchers for science protest ‘alarming’ anti-science trends . USA Today . Retrieved from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2017/04/22/march-science-aims-counter-alarming-anti-science-trends/100780684/
54.
Stenger
V.
(2013 , November 27 ). The rising antiscience . Huffpost . Retrieved from https://www.huffingtonpost.com/victor-stenger/rising-antiscience-faith_b_3991677.html
55.
Suber
P.
(2012 ). Open access . Cambridge, MA : The MIT Press . Retrieved from https://www.dropbox.com/s/5cxsyzs58a5yx5q/9286.pdf?dl=0
56.
Sumner
T.
Shum
S. B.
(1996 ). Open peer review & argumentation: Loosening the paper chains on journals . Ariadne . Retrieved from http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue5/jime
57.
Taub
A.
Nyhan
B.
(2017 , March 22 ). Why people continue to believe objectively false things . The New York Times . Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/22/upshot/why-objectively-false-things-continue-to-be-believed.html
58.
Taylor
A. M.
(2018 , July 20 ). Looking backwards: Is there such a thing as historical truth? [Review of the book , History: Why it matters by L. Hunt] . Times Literary Supplement , p. 29. Retrieved from https://www.the-tls.co.uk/articles/private/history-and-historical-truth/
59.
Thorne
D.
Foohey
P.
Lawless
R. M.
Porter
K. M.
(2018 ). Graying of U.S. bankruptcy: Fallout from life in a risk society . SSRN . Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3226574
60.
Wellmon
C.
Piper
A.
(2017 ). Publication, power, and patronage: On inequality and academic publishing . Critical Review . Retrieved from https://criticalinquiry.uchicago.edu/publication_power_and_patronage_on_inequality_and_academic_publishing/
61.
Wilder
R.
(2006 ). The importance of peer review . Journal of Dental Hygiene , 80 (3 ), 1 -2 . Retrieved from http://jdh.adha.org/content/jdenthyg/80/3/local/complete-issue.pdf