Understanding the outcomes of strengths-based programs requires a better understanding of the extent to which programs actually provide services that are consistent with this model. To this end, we have developed the Strengths-Based Practices Inventory (SBPI). Data collected from two studies of parents participating in either an early childhood prevention program or family support program indicated that the SBPI has 4 related factors: (a) identification and use of strengths, (b) cultural competency, (c) interpersonal sensitivity and knowledge, and (d) relationship-supportive behavior. The SBPI is sensitive to differences between programs in the extent of strengths-based practice and is related to some expected outcomes, including family empowerment and social support.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AkeyT. M., MarquisJ. G., & RossM. E. (2000). Validation of scores on the psychological empowerment scales: A measure of empowerment for parents of children with a disability. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60, 419–438.
2.
BaileyD. B., SimeonssonR. J., WintonP. J., HuntingtonG. S., ComfortM., IsbellP., (1988). Family-focused intervention: A functional model for planning, implementing, and evaluating individualized family services in early intervention. Journal of the Division for Early Childhood, 10, 156–171.
3.
BarnardK. E.(1998). Developing, implementing, and documenting interventions with parents and young children. Zero to Three, 18, 23–29.
4.
BarreraM.Jr. (1980). A method for the assessment of social support networks in community survey research. Connections, 3, 8–13.
5.
BarreraM.Jr. (1986). Distinctions between social support concepts, measures, and models. American Journal of Community Psychology, 14, 413–443.
6.
BazemoreG., & TerryC. T. (1997). Developing delinquent youths: A reintegrative model for rehabilitation and a new role for the juvenile justice system. Child Welfare, 76, 665–716.
7.
BradleyR. H., & CaldwellB. (1984). The relation of infants’ home environments to achievement test performance in the first grade: A follow-up study. Child Development55(3), 803–809.
8.
BrickmanP., RabinowitzV., KaruzaJ., CoatesD., CohnE., & KidderL. (1982). Models of helping and coping. American Psychologist, 37, 368–384.
9.
CurranP. J., WestS. G, & FinchJ. F. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 1, 16–29.
10.
DeChilloN., KorenP. E., & SchultzK. H. (1994). From paternalism to partnership: Family and professional collaboration in children's mental health. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 64, 564–576.
11.
DunstC. J., & TrivetteC. M. (1990). Assessment of social support in early intervention programs. In MeiselsS. & ShonkoffJ. (Eds.), Handbook of early childhood intervention (pp. 326–349). New York: Cambridge University Press.
12.
DunstC. J., & TrivetteC. M., & DealA. G. (1994). Supporting and strengthening families: Vol. 1. Methods, strategies and practices.Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
13.
DunstC. J., TrivetteC. M., & HambyD. (1996). Measuring the help giving practices of human service programs practitioners. Human Relations, 49, 815–835.
14.
GreenB. L., JohnsonS. A., & RodgersA. (1999). Understanding patterns of service delivery and participation in community-based family support programs. Children's Services: Social Policy, Research and Practice, 2, 1–22.
15.
GuralnickM. J. (1997). Second generation research in the field of early intervention. In GuralnickM. J. (Ed.) The effectiveness of early intervention (pp. 3–20). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
16.
HermanS. E., MarcenkoM. O., & HazelK. L. (1996). Parents’ perspectives on quality in family support programs. Journal of Mental Health Administration, 23, 156–169.
17.
HorvathA.O., & GreenbergL.S. (1989). Development and validation of the Working Alliance Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 1, 207–210.
18.
HorvathA. O., & SymondsB. D. (1991). Relation between working alliance and outcome in psychotherapy: A meta-analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 38, 139–149.
19.
KaganS. L., & ShelleyA. (1987). The promise and problems of family support programs. In KaganS. L.PowellD. R.WeissbourdB. & ZiglerE. F. (Eds.), America's family support programs.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
20.
KazakA., & LinneyJ. A. (1983). Coping and life change in the single parent family. American Journal of Community Psychology, 11, 207–220.
21.
KnitzerJ. (1996). Children's mental health: Changing paradigms and policies. In ZiglerE. F.KaganS. L. & HallN. W. (Eds.), Children, families, and government: Preparing for the twenty-first century.New York: Cambridge University Press.
22.
KorenP. E., DeChilloN., & FriesenB. J. (1992). Measuring empowerment in families whose children have emotional disabilities: a brief questionnaire. Rehabilitation Psychology, 37, 305–321.
23.
KormacherJ., KitzmanH. K., & OldsD. L. (1998). Intervention processes as conditioners of home visitation program effects. Journal of Community Psychology, 26, 49–64.
24.
LeffertN., BensonP., ScalesP. C., SharmaA. R., DrakeD. D., & BlythD. A. (1998). Developmental assets: Measurement of risk behaviors among adolescents. Applied Developmental Science, 2, 209–230.
25.
McAllisterC. L., GreenB. L., TerryM., HermanV., & MulveyL. (2003). Parents, practitioners, and researchers: Community-based participatory research with Early Head Start. The American Journal of Public Health, 93, 1672–1679.
26.
McBrideS., & PetersonC. (1996). Home-based early intervention with families of children with disabilities: Who is doing what? Paper presented at Head Start's Third National Research Conference, Washington, DC.
27.
SaleebeyD. (Ed.). (2002). The strengths perspective in social work practice (3rd ed.). New York: Allyn & Bacon.
