Some in social work have called for a paradigm shift away from a focus on problems to a focus on strengths, empowerment, and capacity building. This call sets up an unnatural dichotomy, asking social workers to identify with one side or another. In this article, we review social work history to argue that the best social work practice has always maintained a dual focus on both problems and capacity building. Throughout our history, those who championed a problem-oriented practice also emphasized strengths and growing client capacity, and today's strength-based, capacity-oriented practitioners typically advocate for the solving of consumer's presenting problems.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AddamsJ. (1910). Twenty years at Hull House.New York: Macmillan.
2.
AxinnJ., & LevinH. (1982). Social welfare: A history of the American response to need (2nd ed.). New York: Harper & Row.
3.
BoehmW. W. (1959). The social casework method in social work education. A project report of the curriculum study (Vol. 10). New York: Council on Social Work Education.
4.
BrueggemannW. G. (1996). The practice of macro social work.Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
5.
ChambersC. A. (1963). Seedtime of reform: American social service and social action, 1918–1933.Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
6.
ColeW. I. (1908). Motives and results of the social settlement movement: Notes on an exhibit installed in the Social Museum of Harvard University.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
7.
ComptonB. R., & GallawayB. (1989). Social work processes (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
8.
ComptonB., & GallawayB. (1999). Social work processes (6th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
9.
DinermanM. (1981). Social work curriculum at the baccalaureate and masters level.New York: Lois and Samuel Silberman Fund.
GermainC. B., & GittermanA. (1979). The life model approach to social work practice. In Francis TurnerJ. (Ed.), Social work treatment: Interlocking theoretical approaches (pp. 361–384). New York: Free Press.
12.
GittermanA., & GermainC. B. (1976). Social work practice: A life model. Social Service Review, 50, 601–610.
13.
GottesfeldM. L., & PharisM. E. (1977). Profiles in social workNew York: Human Services Press.
14.
GreifG. L., & LynchA. A. (1983). The eco-systems perspective. In MeyerC. H. (Ed.), Clinical social work in the eco-systems perspective (pp. 35–71). New York: Columbia University Press.
15.
GutierrezL. M., ParsonsR. J., & CoxE. O. (Eds.). (1998). Empowerment in social work practice: A sourcebook.Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
16.
HamiltonG. (1940). Theory and practice of social casework (1st ed.). New York: Columbia University Press.
17.
HamiltonG. (1951). Theory and practice of social casework (2nd ed.). New York: Columbia University Press.
18.
HartmanA., & LairdJ. (1983). Family centered social work practice.New York: Free Press.
19.
HepworthD. H., & LarsenJ. A. (1982). Direct social work practice: Theory and skills.Chicago: Dorsey Press.
20.
HollisF. (1964). Casework: A psychosocial therapy (1st ed.). New York: Random House.
21.
HollisF. (1972). Casework: A psychosocial therapy (2nd ed.). New York: Random House.
22.
JanssonB. S. (1999). Becoming an effective policy advocate: From policy practice to social justice.Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
23.
KargerH. J., & StoeszD. (1998). American social welfare policy: A pluralist approach (3rd ed.). New York: Longman.
24.
Kirst-AshmanK. K., & HullG. (1999). Understanding generalist practice (2nd ed.). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
25.
Kirst-AshmanK. K., & HullG. (2001). Generalist practice with organizations and communities (2nd ed.). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
26.
LeeJ. A. B. (2001). The empowerment approach to social work practice: Building the beloved community (2nd ed.). New York: Columbia University Press.
27.
LockeB., GarrisonR., & WinshipJ. (1998). Generalist social work practice: Context, story and partnerships.Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
28.
LoewenbergF. M. (1977). Fundamentals of social intervention: Core concepts and skills for social work.New York: Columbia University Press.
29.
MaluccioA. N. (1981). Promoting competence in clients: A new/old approach to social work practice.New York: Free Press.
30.
McClainW. H. (1907). Relations existing between defective characteristics and dependence. Proceedings of the National Conference of Charities and Correction, 347–354.
31.
McInnis-DittrichK. (1994). Integrating social welfare policy and social work practice.Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
O'MeliaM., DuBoisB., & MileyK. (1994). From problem-solving to empowerment based social work practice. In GutierrezL. & NunusP. (Eds.), The education and research for empowerment based practice (pp. 161–170). Seattle: University of Washington, School of Social Work, Center for Social Policy and Practice.
34.
PerlmanH. H. (1957). Social casework A problem-solving process.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
35.
PincusA., & MinihanA. (1973). Social work practice: Model and method.Itasca, IL: F. E. Peacock.
36.
PrayJ. E. (1991). Respecting the uniqueness of the individual: Social work practice within a reflective model. Social Work, 36, 80–85.
37.
ProctorE. K., & RosenA. (2003). The structure and function of social work practice guidelines. In RosenA. & ProctorE. (Eds.), Developing practice guidelines for social work intervention: Issues, methods, and research agenda (pp. 108–127). New York: Columbia University Press.
38.
ProctorE. K., RosenA., & RheeC. (2000, July). Toward an outcome based taxonomy for organizing social work interventions and guiding evaluation. Paper presented at the Evaluation for Practice, an International Conference, University of Huddersfield, Great Britain.
39.
ReidW. J. (1978). The task-centered system.New York: Columbia University Press.
40.
ReidW. J., & EpsteinL. (1972). Task-centered caseworkNew York: Columbia University Press.
41.
RichmondM. (1917). Social diagnosis.New York: Sage.
42.
RippleL. (1955). Motivation capacity and opportunity: Theoretical base and plan of study. Social Service Review, 29, 174–193.
43.
RippleL., & AlexanderE. (1956). Motivation capacity and opportunity as related to the use of casework service: Nature of the client's problem. Social Service Review, 30, 38–54.
44.
RippleL., AlexanderE., & PolemisB. W. (1964). Motivation capacity and opportunity: Studies in casework theory and practice, Social service monographs.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
45.
RobinsonV. P. (1930). A changing psychology in social case workChapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
46.
SaleebeyD. (1997a). Introduction: Power to the people. In SaleebeyD. (Ed.), The strengths perspective in social work practice (2nd ed., pp. 1–19). New York: Longman.
47.
SaleebeyD. (1997b). The strengths perspective: Possibilities and problems. In SaleebeyD. (Ed.) The strengths perspective in social work practice (2nd ed., pp. 231–248). New York: Longman.
48.
SanvilleJ. B. (1996). Postlude. In EdwardJ. & SanvilleJ. B. (Eds.), Fostering healing and growth: A psychoanalytic social work approach (pp. 417–441). Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
49.
SimonB. L. (1994). The empowerment tradition in social work.New York: Columbia University Press.
50.
SmalleyR. E. (1971). Social casework: The functional approach. In MorrisR. E. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of social work (16th issue, pp. 1195–1206). New York: National Association of Social Workers.
StaudtM., HowardM. O., & DrakeB. (2001). The operationalization, implementation, and effectiveness of the strengths perspective: A review of empirical studies. Journal of Social Service Research, 27, 1–21.
53.
StreanH. S. (1996). Applying psychoanalytic principles to social work practice: An historical review. In EdwardJ. & SanvilleJ. B. (Eds.), Fostering healing and growth: A psychoanalytic social work approach (pp. 1–22). Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
54.
ThyerB. A., & WodarskiJ. S. (Eds.). (1998). Handbook of empirical social work practice.New York: Wiley.
55.
TowleC. (1954). The learner in education for the professions.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
56.
WeickA., & ChamberlainR. (1997). Putting problems in their place: Further explorations in the strengths perspective. In SaleebeyD. (Ed.), The strengths perspective in social work practice (2nd ed., pp. 39–48). New York: Longman.
57.
WeickA., RappC. A., SullivanW. P., & KirsthardtW. (1989). The strengths perspective for social work practice. Social Work, 34, 350–354.
58.
YelajaS. (1986). Functional theory for social work practice. In TurnerF. J. (Ed.), Social work treatment: Interlocking theoretical approaches (pp. 46–68). New York: Free Press.
