This paper examines the relative importance of type of impairment and gender in the prediction of wage income. Data come from the National Medical Expenditure Survey (NMES) conducted in 1987. The sample includes those people who worked at all during 1987 and is divided into four groups of workers with impairments (those with only a mobility impairment, only a hearing impairment, or only a visual impairment, and those who had any combination of visual, hearing, and mobility impairments) and the remaining group of workers in the general population. Results show that workers with two types of impairments actually earned more than their same-sex peers in the general population, but all groups of women earned less than their male peers. The stronger effect of being male than of any type of disability in predicting wage income was shown by regression equations which included several interaction terms. The results support the interpretation that the labor force treats workers with impairments similarly to their nonimpaired peers of the same sex. The difficulty of changing gender-based labor-force processes is discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alexander, K. (1976). Disability and stratification research. In G. L. Albrecht (Ed.), Sociology of physical disability and rehabilitation (pp. 169–200). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
2.
Altman, B. M. (1985). Disabled women in the social structure. In S. Browne, D. Connors, & N. Stern (Eds.), With the power of each breath: A disabled woman's anthology (pp. 36–46). Pittsburgh, PA: Cleis Publishers.
3.
Altman, B. M., & Barnartt, S. N. (1996, June). Implications of variations in definitions of disability used in policy analysis: The case of labor force outcomes. Presented at the Society for Disability Studies Meeting, Washington, DC.
4.
Baldwin, M. L. (1991). Evidence on the occupational segregation of women with disabilities. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 2 (2), 32–46.
5.
Baldwin, M. L., & Johnson, W. (1995). Labor market discrimination against women with disabilities. Industrial Relations, 34 (4), 55–77.
6.
Baldwin, M. L., Zeager, L. A., & Flacco, P. R. (1994). Gender differences in wage losses from impairments: Estimates from the Survey of Income and Program Participation. Journal of Human Resources, 29 (3), 465–487.
7.
Barnartt, S. N. (1986). Disability as a socioeconomic variable: Predicting deaf workers' incomes. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, New York.
8.
Bianchi, S. (1995). Changing economic roles of men and women. In R. Farley, (Ed.), State of the Union: America in the 1990s, Volume 1: Economic Trends (pp. 107–154). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
9.
Bobko, P. (1995). Correlation and regression: Principles and applications for industrial/organizational psychology and management. New York: McGraw Hill.
10.
Brown, S. C. (1987). Predictors of income variance among a group of deaf former college students. Journal of Rehabilitation of the Deaf, 20 (4), 20–30.
11.
Burkhauser, R. V., & Daly, M. C. (1994). The economic consequences of disability. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 5(1), 25–52.
12.
Christiansen, J. B., & Barnartt, S. N. (1987). The silent minority: The socioeconomic status of deaf people. In P. Higgins & J. E. Nash (Eds.), Understanding deafness socially (pp. 171–196). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
13.
Duncan, B., & Duncan, O. D. (1968). Minorities and the process of stratification. American Sociological Review, 33 (3), 356–364.
14.
Duncan, O. D., Featherman, D. L., & Duncan, B. (1972). Socioeconomic background and achievement. New York: Seminar Press, Inc.
15.
Edwards, S. W., & Berlin, M. (1989). Questionnaires and data collection methods for the Household Survey and the Survey of American Indians and Alaska Natives. (DHHS Publication No. [PHS] 89–3450). National Medical Expenditure Survey Methods 2, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Rockville, MD: Public Health Service.
16.
Farley, R. (1977). Trends in racial inequalities: Have the gains of the 1960's disappeared in the 1970's?American Sociological Review, 42 (April), 189–208.
17.
Gagnon, J. (1974). Physical strength, once of significance. In J. Pleck & J. Sawyer (Eds.), Men and masculinity (pp. 139–149). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
18.
Hall, R. H. (1994). Sociology of work: Perspectives, analyses and issues. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
19.
Hauser, R. M., & Featherman, D. C. (1977). The process of stratification: Trends and analyses. New York: Academic Press.
20.
Hirschman, C., & Wong, M. G. (1984). Socioeconomic gains of Asian Americans, blacks, and hispanics, 1960–1976. American Journal of Sociology, 90 (3), 584–607.
21.
Howe, L. (1977). Pink collar workers: Inside the world of women's work. New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons.
22.
Jencks, C., Smith, M., Acland, H., Bane, M. J., Cohen, D., Gintis, H., Heyns, B., & Michelson, S. (1972). Inequality. New York: Basic Books.
23.
Kirchner, C. (1996). Looking under the street lamp: Inappropriate use of measures just because they are there. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 7(1), 77–90.
24.
Leonard, J. S. (1986). Labor supply incentives and disincentives. In M. Berkowitz & A. M. Hill (Eds.), Disability and the labor market: Economic problems, policies and programs (pp. 64–94). Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.
25.
National Council on Disability. (1996). Achieving independence: The challenge for the 21st century. Washington, DC: Author.
26.
Oppenheimer, V. (1976). The female labor force in the United States: Demographic and economic factors governing its growth and changing composition. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
27.
Reskin, B., & Padavic, I. (1994). Women and men at work. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
28.
Schroedel, J. (1987). Predictors of socioeconomic status. In A. B. Crammatte (Ed.), Meeting the challenge: Hearing-impaired professionals in the workplace (pp. 93–138). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
29.
Sebesta, D., Trupin, L., & Yelin, E. (1996). Racial and gender disparity in labor force participation among persons with disabilities, 1990–1994. Unpublished paper.
30.
Sell, R. R., & Johnson, M. P. (1977). Income and occupational differences between men and women in the U.S. Sociology and Social Research, 62 (1), 1–20.
31.
Shah, B.V. (1981). SESUDAAN: Standard errors program for computing of standardized rates from sample survey data. Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute.
32.
Stevens, G., & Cho, J. H. (1985). Socioeconomic indexes and the new 1980 census occupational classification scheme. Social Science Research (14), 142–168.
33.
Suter, L. E., & Miller, H. P. (1973). Income differences between men and career women. American Journal of Sociology, 78 (4), 200–212.
34.
Tomaskovic-Devey, D. (1993). Gender and racial inequality at work: The sources and consequences of job segregation. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.
35.
Tremain, D. J., & Hartman, H. J. (1981). Equal pay for jobs of equal value. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
36.
Winakur, I. (1973). The income determinants of Gallaudet College Alumni. Unpublished dissertation: American University.
37.
Yelin, E. (1993). Gender, disability and employment. In Occupational medicine: State of the art reviews (pp. 849–857). Philadelphia, PA: Hanley and Belfus, Inc.
