This study analyzes gender differences in Social Security disability awards. Logit analysis is used to identify significant determinants of receiving a Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) or Supplemental Security Income (SSI) award. The results show that, even after controlling for applicant characteristics and nature of impairment, women receive Social Security disability awards at a significantly lower rate than do men. An analysis of the process whereby eligibility for SSDI is determined shows that men and women are equally likely to satisfy medical criteria for awards, but women, particularly women over age 55, are more likely to be rejected on the basis of vocational criteria.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aarts, L. (1982). Work capacity of the disabled. In H. Emanuel, E. H. DeGier, & P. A. B. Kalker Konijn (Eds.), Disability benefits: Factors determining application and awards (pp. 113–136). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
2.
Baldwin, M. L., & Johnson, W. G. (1995). Labor market discrimination against women with disabilities. Industrial Relations, 34 (October), 555–576.
3.
Haveman, R., & Wolfe, B. (1990). The economic well-being of the disabled, 1962–84. Journal of Human Resources, 25 (Winter), 32–54.
4.
Loprest, P., Rupp, K., & Sandell, S. H. (1995). Gender, disabilities and employment in the health and retirement study. Journal of Human Resources, 30 (Supplement), 293–318.
5.
Maddala, G. S. (1983). Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
6.
Mashaw, J. L. (1983). Bureaucratic justice. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
7.
Meyer, C. W., & Wolff, N. (1993). Social security and individual equity: Evolving standards of equity and adequacy. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
8.
Mudrick, N. R. (1988). Disabled women and public policies for income support. In M. Fine & A. Asch (Eds.), Women with disabilities (pp. 245–268). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
9.
Nagi, S. Z. (1969). Disability and rehabilitation. Columbus: Ohio State University.
10.
Nagi, S. Z. (1982). Decision criteria and the question of equity and incentives. In H. Emanuel, E. H. DeGier, & P. A. B. Kalker Konijn (Eds.), Disability benefits: Factors determining application and awards (pp. 157–176). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
11.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1989). Labor force status and other characteristics of persons with a work disability: 1981 to 1988. Current Population Reports, Series P-23, No. 160. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
12.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1995). Statistical Abstract of the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
13.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (1984). Social Security handbook. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Social Security Administration, SSA Publication No. 05–10135. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
14.
U.S. General Accounting Office. (1992). Social Security: Racial difference in disability decisions warrants further investigation. GAO/HRD-92–56. Washington, DC: Author.
15.
U.S. General Accounting Office. (1994). Social Security Disability: Most of gender difference explained. GAO/HEHS-94–94. Washington, DC: Author.
16.
WHO. (1980). International classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps. Geneva: Author.
