This paper begins with four reinterpretations about the prevalence, trends, temporality, and spread of disability. Together they lead to a different view of disability as quite pervasive in terms of sheer numbers, length of disability experience, and domains of life, as well as organ systems affected. The denial of this reality is related to our attempt to make disability "fixed" and "dichotomous," whereas it is better conceived of as "fluid" and "continuous." The costs of maintaining the former position are traced in notions of disability's "real" numbers and measurement, as well as in research, policy, and advocacy arenas. A redirection is suggested in terms of a more multidimensional approach and a purging of the inherent negative elements in current conceptions and measurement of disability.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alonso, W., & Starr, P. (Eds.). (1987). The politics of numbers (for the National Committee for Research on the 1980 Census). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
2.
Altman, B. (1986, August). Definitions of disability in empirical research: Is the use of an administrative definition coopting the results of disability research. Paper presented at the American Sociological Association Convention. New York .
3.
Arnold, J., Miller, J., Sher, J., Lewin, I., & West, J. (1992, June). Sharing the risk and ensuring independence: A disability perspective on health care reform. Paper prepared for the National Council on Disability, Washington, DC.
4.
Badley, E.M. (1987). The ICIDH: Format, application in different settings, and distinction between disability and handicap. International Disability Studies, 9, 122-125.
5.
Barnartt, S.N., & Seelman, K.D. (1985). A comparison of federal laws toward disabled and racial/ethnic groups in the United States. Disability, Handicap and Society, 3(1), 37-48.
6.
Berg, R. L., & Cassells, J. S. (Eds.). (1990). The second fifty years: Promoting health and preventing disability. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
7.
Boggs, E.M. (1990). Uses and abuses of disability statistics in political contexts. Disability Studies Quarterly, 10(3), 21-23.
8.
Boston Woman's Health Collective. (1970). Women and their bodies: A course. Boston: New England Free Press.
9.
Boston Women's Health Book Collective. (1972 ). Our bodies ourselves. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Bowe, F.G. (1992, September). Empowerment. OSERS News in Print. [U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC 20202.]
13.
Brody, S. J., & Ruff, G. E. (Eds.). (1986). Aging and rehabilitation: Advances in the state of the art. New York: Springer.
14.
Budetti, P.B., & Newacheck, P.W. (1984). Chronic disease and disability: Are the risks increasing? Mobius, 4(3), 14-19.
15.
Bureau of the Census, U.S. Department of Commerce. (1981). Selected data from the census disability survey pretest. Richmond, VA, SMSA, January/February, 1980.
16.
Bury, M.R. (1987). The ICIDH: A review of research and prospects . International Disability Studies, 9(3), 118-122.
17.
Colvez, A., & Blanchet, M. (1981). Disability trends in the United States population 1966-76: Analysis of reported causes. American Journal of Public Health, 71(5),464-471.
18.
Commission on Chronic Illness. (1957). Chronic illness in the United States, volume IV, Chronic illness in a large city: The Baltimore study. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Unviersity Press.
19.
Conrad, P. (1992). Medicalization and social control. Annual Review of Sociology, 18, 209-232.
20.
Conrad, P., & Schneider, J.W. (1980). Deviance and medicalization: From badness to sickness. St. Louis, MO: C. V. Mosby.
21.
Crawford, R. (1977). You are dangerous to your health: The ideology of victim blaming. International Journal of Health Services , 7, 663-680.
22.
Crawford, R. (1979). Individual responsibility and health politics in the 1970s. In S. Reverby & D. Rosner (Eds.), Health care in America (pp. 247-268). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
23.
Crewe, N.M., & Zola, I. K., & Associates. ( 1983). Independent living for physically disabled people. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
24.
Czajka, J. (1984). Digest of data on persons with disabilities. (Report submitted to the Congressional Research Service.)Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research.
25.
DeJong, G. (1983). Defining and implementing the independent living concept. In Crewe & Zola, Independent living for physically disabled people (4-27). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
26.
DeVivo, M.J., Rutt, R.D., Black, K.J., Go, B.K., & Stover, S.L. (1992). Trends in spinal cord injury demographics and treatment outcomes between 1973 and 1986. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 73, 424-430.
27.
Dubos, R. (1961). Mirage of health. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
28.
Ehrenreich, B., & Ehrenreich, J. (1975). Medicine and social control . In B. Mandell (Ed.), Welfare in America: Controlling the dangerous classes. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
29.
Ehrenreich, B., & English, D. (1979). For her own good: 150 years of the experts' advice on women. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
30.
Erikson, E.H. (1950). Childhood and society. New York: W. W. Norton.
31.
Erikson, E.H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York: W. W. Norton.
32.
Faigel, H. (1985). When the learning disabled go to college. Journal of American College Health, 43, 18-22.
33.
Feinlieb, M., & Wilson, R.W. (1985). Trends in health in the United States. Environmental Health Perspectives, 62, 267-276.
34.
Feinstein, P. H., Gornick, M., & Greenberg, J. N. (Eds.). (1984). The need for new approaches in long-term care . In P. H. Feinstein, M. Gornick, & J. N. Greenberg , (Eds.), Long-term care financing and delivery systems: Exploring some alternatives, 7-12. Conference Proceedings , January 24, 1984, Washington, DC: Health Care Financing Administration.
35.
Feldman, J.J. (1983). Work ability of the aged under conditions of improving mortality. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly/Health and Society, 61 (3), 430-444.
36.
Fenderson, D.A. (1986). Aging, disability, and therapeutic optimism. In S. J. Brody & G. E. Ruff, Aging and rehabilitation: Advances in the state of the art (3-12). New York: Springer .
37.
Ferron, D.T. (1981). Disability survey 72: Disabled and nondisabled adults. (Research Report No. 56.) Washington, DC: Social Security Administration, U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services.
38.
Ficke, R.C. (1992). Digest of data on persons with disabilities. Washington, DC: National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research.
39.
Fox, D. M., & Willis, D. P. (Eds.). (1989). Disability policy: Restoring socioeconomic independence. The Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly , Vol. 67, Suppl. 2, Pt. 2, pp. 401-428.
40.
Frey, W.D. (1984). Functional assessment in the '80s: A conceptual enigma, A technical challenge. In A. S. Halpern & M. J. Fuhrer (Eds.), Functional assessment in rehabilitation (pp. 11-43). Baltimore, MD : Paul H. Brookes.
41.
Fulton, J.P., Katz, S., Jack, S.S., & Hendershot, G.E. (1989). Physical functioning of the aged: United States, 1984. Vital and Health Statistics, 10 (167 DHHS Publication No. PHS 89-1595). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.
42.
Fulton, J.P., & Katz, S. (1986). Characteristics of the disabled elderly and implications for rehabilitation. In S. J. Brody & G. E. Ruff, Aging and rehabilitation: Advances in the state of the art (36-46). New York: Springer.
43.
Funne, K.B., Gingher, N., & Olsen, L.M. (1989). A survey of the medical and functional status of the adult network of the Spina Bifida Association. Rockville, MD: Spina Bifida Association of America .
44.
Gilford, D. M. (Ed.). (1988). The aging population in the twenty-first century: Statistics for health policy . Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
45.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
46.
Graitcer, P.L., & Maynard, F.M. (1990). First colloqium on preventing secondary disabilities among people with spinal cord injuries. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control, U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services.
47.
Gritzer, G., & Arluke, A. (1985). The making of rehabilitation: A political economy of medical specialization 1890-1980. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Guralnik, J.M., LaCroix, A.Z., Everett, D.F., & Kovar, M.G. (1989). Aging in the eighties: The prevalence of comorbidity and its association with disability. Advance Data from Vital and Health Statistics (170), Washington, DC.
50.
Haan, M.N., Rice, D.P., Satariano, W.A., & Selby, J.V. (1991). Guest editors. Living longer and doing worse? Present and future trends in the health of the elderly. Journal of Aging and Health, 3, 133-307.
51.
Haber, L.D. (1990). Issues in the definition of disability and the use of disability survey data. In D. B. Levine, M. Zitter, & L. Ingram, Disability statistics: An Assessment . Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
52.
Hahn, H. (1985). Disability policy and the problem of discrimination . American Behavioral Scientist, 28, 293-318.
53.
Halstead, L.S., & Wiechers, D. (1985). Late effects of poliomyelitis. New York: Symposia Foundation.
54.
Harrington, M. (1962). The other America. New York : Macmillan.
55.
Harris, L. (1986). The ICD survey of disabled Americans: Bringing disabled Americans into the mainstream. New York: International Center for the Disabled.
56.
Henderson, C. (1992). College freshmen with disabilities: A statistical profile. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
57.
Iezzoni, L.I. et al. (1992). Comorbidities, complications and coding bias: Does the number of diagnosis codes matter in predicting in hospital mortality?Journal of the American Medical Association, April 22/29, Vol. 267, No. 16, 2197-2203.
58.
Illich, I. (1976). Medical Nemesis. New York: Pantheon.
59.
Johnson, M.V., Keith, R.A., & Hinderer, S.R. (1992). Measurement standards for interdisciplinary medical rehabilitation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 73(12-S), 1-23.
60.
Johnson, M. (1987). Emotion and pride: The search for a disability culture. The Disability Rag, 8(January-February, pt. 1 ), 4-10.
61.
Johnson, M. (1990). The media and disability statistics. Disability Studies Quarterly, 10(3), 12-14.
62.
Kaplan, D., DeWitt, J., & Steyaert, M. (1991). Telecommunications and persons with disabilities: Laying the foundation. Oakland, CA: World Institute on Disability.
63.
Kaufert, J.M., Green, S., Dunt, D.R., Corkhill, R., Creese, A.L., & Locker, D. (1979). Assessing functional status among elderly patients: A comparison of questionnaire and service provider ratings. Medical Care, 17(8), 807-817.
64.
Katz, S., Branch, L.G., Branson, M.H., Papsidero, J.A., Beck, J.C., & Greer, D.S. (1983). Active life expectancy. New England Journal of Medicine, 309, 1218-1224.
65.
Keller, E.F. (1985). Reflections on gender and science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
66.
Kelman, S. (1987). The political foundations of American statistical policy. In W. Alonso & P. Starr (Eds.), The politics of numbers . New York: Sage.
67.
Kiernan, W.E., & Bruininks, R.H. (1986). Demographic characteristics . In W. E. Kiernan & J. A. Stark (Eds.), Pathways to employment for adults with disabilities (pp. 21-50). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
68.
Kirchner, C. (1990a). People with disabilities: A population influx . In R. V. Smith & J. H. Leslie, Jr., (Eds.), Rehabilitation engineering (pp. 3-27). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
69.
Kirchner, C. (1990b). The politics of disability statistics: Who counts what and why. Disability Studies Quarterly, 10(3), 1-2.
70.
Knowles, J. (Ed.). (1977). Doing better and feeling worse: Health in the United States. New York: W. W. Norton.
71.
Kraus, L.E., & Stoddard, S. (1989). Chartbook on disability in the United States. (An InFoUse Report.)Washington, DC: U.S. National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research.
72.
Kuhn, T. (1964). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
73.
LaPlante, M.P. (1988). Data on disability from the National Health Interview Survey 01983-85. (An InFoUse Report.)Washington, DC: U.S. National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research.
74.
LaPlante, M.P. (1989, April). Outline of disability statistics issues. Paper presented to the Committee on National Statistics, National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences. Washington, DC.
75.
LaPlante, M.P. (1990). Who counts as having a disability? Musings on the meaning and prevalence of disability. Disability Studies Quarterly, 10(3), 15-17.
76.
LaPlante, M.P. (1991a). Disability in basic life activities across the life span. (Disability Statistics Report 1.)Washington, DC: National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research.
77.
LaPlante, M.P. (1991b). The demographics of disability. In J. West, The Americans with Disabilities Act: From policy to practice (55-77). New York: Milbank Memorial Fund.
78.
Laurie, G., & Raymond, J. (Eds.). (1984). Proceedings of rehabilitation Gazette's 2nd International Post-Polio Conference and Symposium on Living Independently with Severe Disability. Gazette International Networking Institute, St. Louis, Missouri.
79.
Leonard, E. (1984). La Brava. New York: Avon.
80.
Levine, D. B.,Zitter, M., & Ingram, L. (Eds.). (1990). Disability statistics: An assessment-Report of a workshop. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
81.
Levinson, D. (1978). The seasons of a man's life. New York: Knopf.
82.
Liang, J., & Whitelaw, N.A. (1990). Assessing the physical and mental health of the elderly. In S. M. Stahl, The legacy of longevity: Health and healthcare in later life (35-54). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
83.
Lifchez, R., & Winslow, B. (1979). Design for independent living: The environment and physically disabled people. New York: Whitney Library of Design.
84.
Manton, K., & Stallard, E. (1990). Changes in health functioning and mortality. In S. M. Stahl, The legacy of longevity: Health and healthcare in later life (140-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
85.
Manton, K. (1989). Epidemiological, demographic, and social correlates of disability among the elderly. In D. M. Fox & D. P. Willis, (Eds.), Disability policy: Restoring socioeconomic independence (13-58) . New York: Milbank Memorial Fund .
86.
McMahan, D.B. (1992). Employment and the Americans with Disabilities Act: A study of survey responses as a basis for public policy. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Union Institute Graduate School, Cincinnati, Ohio.
87.
McNeil, J. (1989a, December). A plan for a national survey of persons with disabilities. Unpublished paper, U.S. Bureau of the Census . December 18, 1989.
88.
McNeil, J. (1989b, December). Meeting to develop plans for a disability survey. Unpublished paper, U.S. Bureau of the Census.
89.
McNeil, J. (1990a). Our "system" of disability statistics: A brief assessment. Disability Studies Quarterly, 10(3), 18-19.
90.
McNeil, J. (1990b). Proposal for a national survey of persons with disabilities: A status report. Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of the Census.
91.
Miller, J.B. (1976). Toward a new psychology of women. Boston: Beacon Press.
92.
Nagi, S.Z. (1964). A study in the evaluation of disability and rehabilitation potential: Concepts, methods, and procedures. American Journal of Public Health, 54, 1568-1579.
93.
Nagi, S.Z. (1965). Some conceptual issues in disability and rehabilitation . In M. B. Sussman (Ed.), Sociology and rehabilitation. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
94.
Nagi, S.Z. (1991). Disability concepts revisited: Implications for prevention. In A. Pope & A. Tarlov (Eds.), Disability in America: Toward a national agenda for prevention. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
95.
Navarro, V. (1976). Medicine under capitalism. New York: Prodist.
96.
Newacheck, P.W., Budetti, P.P., & Halfon, N. (1986). Trends in activity-limiting chronic conditions among children. American Journal of Public Health, 76, 178-183.
97.
Newacheck, P.W., Budetti, P.P., & McManus, M. (1984). Trends in childhood disability. American Journal of Public Health, 74, 232-236.
98.
Newacheck, P.W., Stoddard, J.J., & McManus, M. (1992, June). Ethnocultural variations in the prevalence and impact of childhood chronic conditions. Paper presented at conference on Culture and Chronic Illness: Rearing Children in a Culturally Diverse World. Racine, Wisconsin, June 26-28, 1992.
99.
Olshansky, S.J. (1985). Pursuing longevity: Delay vs. elimination of degenerative diseases. American Journal of Public Health, 75(7), 754-757.
100.
Petersen, W. (1987). Politics and the measurement of ethnicity. In W. Alonso & P. Starr, (Eds.), The politics of numbers. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
101.
Pope, A. M. , & Tarlov, A. (Eds.). (1991). Disability in America: Toward a national agenda for prevention. Washington, DC : National Academy Press.
102.
President's Committee on Employment of the Handicapped. (1967). Designs for all Americans. Washington, DC: Author.
103.
Rice, D.P., & LaPlante, M.P. (1988). Chronic illness, disability, and imposing longevity. In S. Sullivan & M. E. Lewin (Eds), The economics and ethics of long-term care and disability (pp. 9-55). Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
104.
Ruzek, S.B. (1978). The women's health movement: Feminist alternatives to medical control. New York: Praeger .
105.
Ryan, W. (1970). Blaming the victim. New York : Pantheon.
106.
Sato, H. (1989). Secondary disabilities of adults with cerebral palsy in Japan. Disability Studies Quarterly, 9, 14.
107.
Schein, J.D. (1990). Does census make sense?Disability Studies Quarterly, 10(3), 17-18.
108.
Scotch, R.K. (1984). From good will to civil rights: Transforming federal disability policy. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
109.
Scotch, R.K. (1990). The politics of disability statistics. Disability Studies Quarterly, 10(3), 14-15.
110.
Seelman, K.D. (1990). A menu for political analysis of disability statistics . Disability Studies Quarterly, 10(3), 23-25.
111.
Sheehy, G. (1974). Passages: Predictable crises of adult life. New York: Dutton.
112.
Simpson, G., Keer, D., & Cynamon, M. (1993). Plans for the 1993-94 National Health Interview Survey on Disability. Disability Studies Quarterly, 13(1), 21-24.
113.
Stahl, S. M. (Ed.). (1990). The legacy of longevity: Health and health care in later life. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
114.
Stahl, S.M., & Feller, J.R. (1990). Old equals sick: An ontogenetic fallacy. In Stahl, op. cit., 21-34.
115.
Starr, P. (1982). The social transformation of American medicine . New York: Basic Books.
116.
Statistics Canada. (1991). Health and activity limitation survey: User's guide. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.
117.
Statistics Canada Daily. (1988, May 31). Ottawa : Statistics Canada.
118.
Stone, D.A. (1984). The disabled state. Philadelphia , PA: Temple University Press.
119.
Struyk, R.J., & Katsura, H.M. (1987). Aging at home: How the elderly adjust their housing without moving. New York: The Haworth Press.
120.
Trieschmann, R.B. (1988). Spinal cord injuries: Psychological, social, and vocational rehabilitation (2nd ed.). New York: Demos.
121.
Trussell, R.E., & Elinson, J. (1959). Chronic illness in the United States. Volume III. Chronic illness in a rural area -The Hunterdon study. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
122.
Verbrugge, L.M. (1984). Longer life but worsening health? Trends in health and mortality of middle-aged and older persons. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly/Health and Society, 62(3), 475-519.
123.
Verbrugge, L.M. (1990). The iceberg of disability. In S. M. Stahl (Ed.), The legacy of longevity (pp. 55-75). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
124.
Verbrugge. L.M. (1992, December). Survey research on disability: Its relevance for the ADA. Paper presented at the conference Furthering the Goals of the Americans with Disabilities Act Through Disability Policy Research in the 1990s, Washington, DC.
125.
Verbrugge, L.M., & Jette, A. (1993). The disablement process. Forthcoming.
126.
Verbrugge, L.M., Lepkowski, J.M., & Imanaka, Y. (1989). Comorbidity and its impact on disability. Milbank Quarterly/Health and Society, 67, 450-484.
127.
Waitzkin, H. (1983). The second sickness: Contradictions of capitalist health care. New York: Free Press .
128.
Waitzkin, H., & Waterman, B. (1974). The exploitation of illness in capitalist society . Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
129.
Waxman, B.F., & Finger, A. (1989). The politics of sex and disability. Disability Studies Quarterly, 9(3), 1-5.
130.
West, J. (Ed.). (1991). The Americans with Disabilities Act: From policy to practice. New York: Milbank Memorial Fund.
131.
Wiesenfeld, S.L. (1967). Sickle-cell trait in human biological and cultural evolution. Science, 157, 1134-1140.
132.
Williams, G.H. (1987). Disablement and the social context of daily activity . International Disability Studies, 9(3), 97-102.
133.
Wilson, R.W., & Drury, T.F. (1984). Interpreting trends in illness and disability: Health statistics and health status. Annual Review of Public Health, 5, 83-106.
134.
Wood, P.H.N. (1980). International classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps: A manual of classification relating to the consequences of disease. Geneva: World Health Organization .
135.
Wood, P.H.N. (1987). Maladies imaginaires: Some common misconceptions about the ICIDH. International Disability Studies, 9(3), 125-128.
136.
Zill, N., & Schoenborn, C.A. (1990). Developmental, learning, and emotional problems: Health of our nation's children, United States, 1988. Advance data from Vital and Health Statistics, No. 190Washington, DC: National Center for Health Statistics .
137.
Zola, I.K. (1972a). Studying the decision to see a doctor: Review, critique, corrective. In Z. Lipowski (Ed.), Advances in psychosomatic medicine (Vol. 8, pp. 216-236).
138.
Zola, I.K. (1972b). Medicine as an institution of social control . Sociological Review, 20(4) (November), 487-504.
139.
Zola, I.K. (1975). In the name of health and illness: On some socio-political consequences of medical influence. Social Science in Medicine , 9(February), 83-87.
140.
Zola, I.K. (1982a). Missing pieces: A chronicle of living with a disability. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
141.
Zola, I.K. (1982b). Social and cultural disincentives to independent living. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (August, Vol. 63, pp. 394-397).
142.
Zola, I.K. (1983). Socio-medical inquiries: Recollections, reflections and reconsiderations. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
143.
Zola, I.K. (1989). Toward the necessary universalizing of a disability policy. In D. M. Fox & D. P. Willis (Eds.), Disability policy: Restoring socioeconomic independence. The Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, Vol. 67, Suppl. 2, Pt. 2, pp. 401-428.
144.
Zola, I. K., & Kirchner, C. (Eds.). (1990). Disability demographics. Issue theme. Disability Studies Quarterly, 10(3, Summer), pp. 1-39.
