The Americans with Disabilities Act and the Current State of U.S. Disability Policy

Abstract

The passage of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) reflects a new stage in American disability policy. However, important policy issues that pre-date the passage of ADA remain unresolved. The most important concern policy assumptions that have guided various disability income and medical assistance programs since their inception in the 1950s and 1960s. The most detrimental assumption is that, to be eligible for income or medical assistance, the impairment must be so hopeless that future prospects for work are impossible. This assumption is self-fulfilling and out of step with the policy assumptions that motivated the passage of the ADA. The article recommends six policy changes that will allow other portions of the nation's disability policy to function in harmony with the policy goals of the ADA.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Batavia, A.I. (1990). Meeting the health care needs of physically disabled persons in the Netherlands: Implications for U.S. policy. New York: Rehabilitation International.

Batavia, A.I. , DeJong, G. , & McKnew, L. (1990). Toward a national personal assistance program: The independent living model of long-term care for persons with disabilities. Manuscript submitted for publication.

Berkowitz, E. (1984). Disabled Policy: America's programs for the handicapped . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

DeJong, G. (1979). Independent living: From social movement to analytic paradigm. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation , 60(10), 435-46.

DeJong, G. (1981). Environmental accessibility and independent living outcomes : Directions for disability policy and research. East Lansing: Michigan State University Center for International Rehabilitation.

DeJong, G. and Wenker, T. (1983). Attendant care as a prototype independent living service. Caring 2 (2), 26-30.

Friedan, L. , Friedan, J. , and Laurie, G. (1981). Living independently: Three views of the European experience with implications for the U.S. International Exchange of Ideas in Rehabilitation (Monograph no. 10). New York: World Rehabilitation Fund.

Levitan, S. & Taggart, R. (1982). Rehabilitation, employment and the disabled. In J. Rubin (Ed.) Alternatives in rehabilitating the handicapped: A policy analysis. New York: Human Sciences Press.

Litvak, S. , Zukas, H. , and Heumann, J. (1987). Attending to America: Personal assistance for independent living. Berkeley: World Institute on Disability.

10.

Louis Harris and Associates (1986). The ICD survey of disabled Americans: Bringing disabled Americans into the mainstream. New York: International Center for the Disabled.

11.

MedVene, L.J. & Akabas, S.H. (1979). The job hunt of the disabled: An exploratory study . Regional Rehabilitation Research Institute of the Industrial Social Welfare Center. New York: Columbia University School of Social Work.

12.

National Council on Disability (1986). Toward independence. Washington, DC: author.

13.

National Council on Disability (1988). On the threshold of independence. Washington, DC: author.

14.

Nosek, M. (1985). Toward a national policy on attendant care: The Dutch backdrop. Conference Summary Report. New York: World Rehabilitation Fund.

15.

Ratzka, A.D. (1986). Independent living and attendant care in Sweden: A consumer perspective. International Exchange of Information in Rehabilitation (Monograph No. 34). New York : World Rehabilitation Fund.

16.

Social Security Administration (1990). Current operating statistics Tables M-5, M-13, M-21. Social Security Bulletin, 53 (4),22-47.