The issue of communication accessibility is an extension of the concept of architectural accessibility. Communications accessibility would eliminate barriers to information flow and to communication processes for people with sensory impairments. Among the environmental factors which affect communications accessibility are the availability of technology and architectural design factors. At present some statutes and regulations apply to communications accessibility, but changes are needed in laws and regulations at the federal, state, and local levels. The economic problems raised by the need to enhance communications accessibility are similar to those for architectural accessibility, except that communications accessibility more often entails on-going costs. Although the costs of some modifications may be covered under existing laws or programs, many are not.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Architectural Barriers Act of 1968. 42 U.S.C. 4151 et seq.
2.
Barnartt, S.N. & Seelman, K. (1988). A comparison of federal laws toward disabled and racial/ethnic groups in the USA. Disability, handicap and society3(1), 37-48.
3.
Burgdorf, R.L. (1985). Second wind: The disability rights movement yesterday, today and tomorrow. Presented at the Paralyzed Veterans of America meeting, Washington, DC.
4.
Burgdorf, R.L. (1986). Communication technology, people with disabilities, and the law. Presented at the Forum on Marketplace Problems and Communication Technology for Disabled People, Washington, DC.
5.
Compton, C.L. (1989). Assistive devices. Seminars in Hearing10(1), 1-122.
6.
DeJong, G. & Lifchez, R. (1983). Physical disability and public policy. Scientific American248(6), 40-49.
7.
DuBow, S. (1987, January). Law and the deaf: Combatting employment discrimination. Silent News.
8.
DuBow, S. & Goldberg, L.J. (1979). The Rehabilitation Act of 1973 ... six years later. Gallaudet Today10(1): 23-28.
9.
DuBow, S., Goldberg, L., Geer, S., Gardner, E., Penn, A., Conlon, S., & Charmatz, M. (1984). Legal rights of hearing impaired people. Washington, DC: Gallaudet College Press .
10.
Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975. 20 U.S.C. 1401 et seq.
11.
Finitzo-Hieber, G. (1981). Classroom acoustics. In Roeser and Downers (Eds.), Auditory disorders in school children: The law, identification, remediation (pp. 250-62). New York: Thieme-Stratton, Inc.
12.
Goldman, C. D. Esq. (1987). Disability rights guide. Lincoln, NE: Media Publishing Co.
13.
Gracer, B. (1987). Communications accessibility to deaf and hard of hearing students in eight Massachusetts colleges and universities, unpublished paper, Massachusetts Commission on the Deaf and Hard of Hearing.
14.
Hahn, H. (1985). Disability Policy and the Problem of Discrimination . American Behavioral Scientist28(3), 293-318.
15.
Hearing Aid Compatability Act of 1988. 47 U.S.C. 610.
16.
Hull, K. (1979). The rights of physically handicapped people. New York: Avon Books.
17.
Lane, H. (1984). When the mind hears. NYRandom House.
18.
Lubinski, R. (1984). The environmental role in communication skills and opportunities of older people. In Wilder and Weinstein (Eds.), Aging and communication. NY: Haworth Press.
19.
Kirchner, C. (1985). Data on blindness and visual impairment in the US: A resource manual on characteristics, education, employment and service de. livery. New York: American Foundation for the Blind.
20.
Markowicz, A. & Reeb, K.G. (1989). Medicaid payments for rehabilitation equipment: Overview. Assistive Technology1: 11-17.
21.
Mendelsohn, S.B. (1987). Financing adaptive technology: A guide to success and strategies for blind and visually-impaired users. New York: Smiling Interface.
22.
National Council on the Handicapped. (1988 ). On the threshold of independence: Progress on legislative recommendations from Toward Independence. Washington, DC : Author.
23.
National Rehabilitation Agency. (1988). Revised manual for accessibility. Alexandria, VA : Author.
24.
Office of Technology Assessment. (1986). Hearing impairment and elderly people-A background paper (OTA-BP-BA-30) . Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
25.
Rehabilitation Act of 1973. 29 U.S.C. 791 et seq.
26.
Ross, M. (1986). Classroom amplification. In W. R. Hodgson (Ed.), Hearing aid assessment and use in audiologic habilitation, (pp. 231-263). Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins.
27.
Sanders, D.A. (1982). Aural rehabilitation: A management model (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
28.
Sacks, O. (1988, June 2). The revolution of the deaf. New YorkReview of Books, pp. 23-28.
29.
Seelman, K. (1987a). Testimony submitted to the U.S. Department of Transportation. DOT Docket 45162, Notice #87-19, DAB 204 (9.30.87).
30.
Seelman, K. (1987b). Disabled consumers' access to telecommunications: A survey of telephone companies, public utilities commissions, and offices of people's councils. Washington, DC: National Rehabilitation Information Center.
31.
Seelman, K. (1989). Technology for deaf and hard of hearing students . Presented at the Rehabilitation Engineering Society of North America annual meeting, New Orleans.
32.
Strauss, K.P. (1985). Television, telephones and TDDS: access is the issue. Gallaudet Today15(3), 17-21.
33.
Technology-Related Assistance for Individuals with Disabilities Act of 1988. 29 U.S.C. 2201.
34.
Telecommunication Accessibility Enhancement Act of 1988. 40 U.S.C. 762.
35.
Telecommunication for the Disabled Act of 1982. 47 U.S.C. 610.
