The field of adapted physical activity (APA) and other areas often associated with APA focused on physical activity for people with disabilities, such as adapted physical education (APE) and disability sports (DS), is often marginalized and misunderstood. Little attention has been given to subsets of the general population’s familiarity of this field and related areas. The purpose of this study was to examine college students’ awareness of APA terminology and related organizations. Undergraduate students from 2 U.S. universities (n = 995) completed a survey on their familiarity of APA terminology (APE, DS, and therapeutic recreation [TR]) and related organizations (Paralympics [PL], and Special Olympics [SO]). Students were most familiar with SO, DS, and PL. Familiarity with these terms and organizations, except for TR, were positively associated with being comfortable with people with disabilities (p < .01). Students who reported having a close connection to a person with a disability were significantly more familiar with DS and SO (p = .001). Students with personal connections to people with disabilities appeared to be more aware of APA-related professions and associations. As future leaders, college students can influence the direction of future public policies and resources; thus, because these findings suggests that college students lack the basic familiarity with many APA-related areas, this insinuates that these areas may suffer from a lack of support policies and resources needed to flourish. Further research is needed to fully understand the relationships college students have with people with disabilities and how these may have more awareness of APA-related professions and associations.
AllportG. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Addison-Wesley.
2.
BlauwetC. A.IezzoniL. I. (2014). From the Paralympics to public health: Increasing physical activity through legislative and policy initiatives. PM&R, 6(8), S4–S10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2014.05.014
3.
BogartK. R.BonnettA. K.LoganS. W.KallemC. (2020). Intervening on disability attitudes through disability models and contact in psychology education. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 8(1), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000194
4.
BogartK. R.LoganS. W.HospodarC.WoekelE. (2018). Disability models and attitudes among college students with and without disabilities. Stigma and Health, 4(3), 260–263. https://doi.org/10.1037/sah0000142
5.
BroadheadG. D. (1990). Adapted physical activity—Terminology and concepts. In Doll-TepperG.DahmsC.DollB.von SelzamH. (Eds.), Adapted physical activity (pp. 3–9). Springer.
6.
CaseL.SchramB.JungJ.LeungW.YunJ. (2021). A meta-analysis of the effect of adapted physical activity service-learning programs on college student attitudes toward people with disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation, 43(21), 2990–3002. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2020.1727575
7.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Earlbaum.
8.
CounsellS.AgranM. (2013). Understanding the Special Olympics debate from lifeworld and system perspectives: Moving beyond the liberal egalitarian view toward empowered recreational living. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 23(4), 245–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/1044207312450751
9.
CreswellJ. W.CreswellJ. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage.
10.
DegenerT. (2016). A human rights model of disability. In BlanckE.FlynnE. (Eds.), Routledge handbook of disability law and human rights (pp. 47–66). Routledge.
11.
DePauwK. P. (2020). Historical viewpoint on adapted physical education. In HaegeleJ.HodgeS.ShapiroD. (Eds.), Routledge handbook of adapted physical education (pp. 7–24). Routledge.
12.
DillonS. R.AdamsD.GoudyL.BittnerM.McNamaraS. (2017). Evaluating exercise as evidence-based practice for individuals with autism spectrum disorder. Frontiers in Public Health, 4, 290. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2016.00290
13.
DunnD. (2015). The social psychology of disability. Oxford University Press.
HaegeleJ. A.HealyS.ZhuX. (2018). Physical activity and obesity among nine-year-old children with and without chronic health problems, illness, or disabilities in Ireland. Disability and Health Journal, 11(1), 143–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2017.08.002
16.
HagenN. A.StilesC.NekolaichukC.BiondoP.CarlsonL. E.FisherK.FainsingerR. (2008). The Alberta Breakthrough Pain Assessment Tool for cancer patients: A validation study using a Delphi process and patient think-aloud interviews. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 35(2), 136–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.03.016
Individuals with Disabilities Improvement Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (2004).
19.
JungJ.LeungW.SchramB. M.YunJ. (2018). Meta-analysis of physical activity levels in youth with and without disabilities. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 35(4), 381–402. https://doi.org/10.1123/apaq.2017-0123
20.
KingstonJ. (2012). Choosing a knowledge dissemination approach. Knowledge and Process Management, 19(3), 160–170. https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.1391
21.
LampeL.CoulstonC.WalterG.MalhiG. (2010). Familiarity breeds respect: Attitudes of medical students towards psychiatry following a clinical attachment. Australasian Psychiatry, 18(4), 348–353. https://doi.org/10.3109/10398561003739612
22.
MartinJ. J. (2013). Benefits and barriers to physical activity for individuals with disabilities: A social-relational model of disability perspective. Disability and Rehabilitation, 35(24), 2030–2037. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2013.802377
23.
McConkeyR.SlaterP.DuboisL.ShellardA.SmithA. (2020). Engagement with Special Olympics by the general public in 17 countries world-wide. Sport in Society, 25, 1766–1777. https://doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2020.1830971
24.
McConkeyR.SlaterP.SmithA.DuboisL.ShellardA. (2021). Perceptions of the rights and capabilities of people with intellectual disability in the United States. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 34(2), 537–545. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12819
McKayC. (2018). The value of contact: Unpacking Allport’s contact theory to support inclusive education. Palaestra, 32(1), 21–25.
27.
McNamaraS.DillonS. (2020). Finding a home for adapted physical education in individualized education program software. European Journal of Adapted Physical Activity, 13(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.5507/euj.2019.015
28.
McNamaraS.WilsonK.LiebermanL. (2022). The syllabus is a living document: An examination of introductory adapted physical education syllabi. The Physical Educator, 79, 117–141. https://doi.org/10.18666/TPE-2022-V79-I210607
29.
MisenerL.DarcyS.LeggD.GilbertK. (2013). Beyond Olympic legacy: Understanding Paralympic legacy through a thematic analysis. Journal of Sport Management, 27(4), 329–341. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.27.4.329
30.
NicholaosD.JosephK.MeropiT.CharilaosK. (2006). A survey of public awareness, understanding, and attitudes toward epilepsy in Greece. Epilepsia, 47(12), 2154–2164. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1167.2006.00891.x
31.
ObrusnikovaI.MiccinelloD. L. (2012). Parent perceptions of factors influencing after-school physical activity of children with autism spectrum disorders. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 29(1), 63–80. https://doi.org/10.1123/apaq.29.1.63
32.
OrdoñezM.SerratO. (2017). Disseminating knowledge products. In SerrantO. (Ed.), Knowledge solutions tools, methods, and approaches to drive organizational performance (pp.871–878). Springer.
33.
PanC. C.McNamaraS. (2022). The impact of adapted physical education on physical fitness of students with intellectual disabilities: A three-year study. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 69(4), 1257–1272. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2020.1776851
34.
PaulhusD. L. (1984). Two-component models of socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(3), 598–609. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.3.598
35.
PeersD.Spencer-CavaliereN.EalesL. (2014). Say what you mean: Rethinking disability language in Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 31(3), 265–282. https://doi.org/10.1123/apaq.2013-0091
36.
Pelleboer-GunninkH. A.van OorsouwW.van WeeghelJ.EmbregtsP. (2021). Familiarity with people with intellectual disabilities, stigma, and the mediating role of emotions among the Dutch general public. Stigma and Health, 6(2), 173–183. https://doi.org/10.1037/sah0000228
37.
PettigrewT.TroppL. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751–783. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751
38.
PettigrewT.TroppL.WagnerU.ChristO. (2011). Recent advances in intergroup contact theory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 35(3), 271–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2011.03.001
39.
ReidG. (2003). Defining adapted physical activity. In SteadwardR. D.WheelerG. D.WatkinsonE. J. (Eds.), Adapted physical activity (pp. 11–25). Edmonton.
40.
ReimerA.MaseA.MulvaneyK.MullendoreN.Perry-HillR.ProkopyL. (2014). The impact of information and familiarity on public attitudes toward the eastern hellbender. Animal Conservation, 17(3), 235–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/acv.12085
41.
RowlandM. P.BellE. C. (2012). Measuring the attitudes of sighted college students toward blindness. Journal of Blindness Innovation and Research, 2(2), 24. https://doi.org/10.5241/2F2-24
42.
SciorK. (2011). Public awareness, attitudes and beliefs regarding intellectual disability: A systematic review. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32(6), 2164–2182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2011.07.005
43.
SeoW. S.ChenR. K. (2009). Attitudes of college students towards people with disabilities. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 40(4), 3–8.
44.
SpauldingL. S.PrattS. M. (2015). A review and analysis of the history of special education and disability advocacy in the United States. American Educational History Journal, 42(1–2), 91–109.
45.
WernerS. (2015). Public stigma and the perception of rights: Differences between intellectual and physical disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 38, 262–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2014.12.030
46.
WinnickJ. P.PorrettaD. (2017). Adapted physical education and sport. Human Kinetics.
