In this article, we present findings from a participatory action-research program in France on the exercise of human rights and supported and substitute decision-making, inspired by the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (“CRPD”). Bringing together persons with the lived experience of disability; academics; and health, social care, and support professionals, the project used the method of “experience-based construction of public problem” to transform experience into collective expertise. This enabled the exploration of support that people in vulnerable situations, whose capacity to exercise their human rights has weakened, need to make decisions in their lives and participate meaningfully in public debate. The relationship between the awareness of rights and exercise of rights is discussed. We argue for the need to balance out the positions of different contributors in participatory action research, in a reasoned manner, by recognizing the scientific and citizen-based participation of all partners.
BlanckP.MartinisJ. (2015). “The right to make choices”: National resource center for supported decision-making. Inclusion, 3(1), 24–33.
7.
BorkmanT. (1976). Experiential knowledge: A new concept for the analysis of self-help groups. Social Service Review, 50(3), 445–456.
8.
BurcaG.de KeohaneR. O.SabelC. (2013). New modes of pluralist global governance. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, 45(1), 723–786.
9.
CallonM.RabeharisoaV. (1999). La leçon d’humanité de Gino [Gino’s lesson on humanity]. Réseaux, 95, 197–233.
Capdroits. (2018b, June7). Civil capacity and legal restrictions: In support of a change of outlook and practices. Advocacy Handbook. https://confcap-capdroits.org/plaidoyer/
13.
ColdefyM.FernandesS. (2017). Les soins sans consentement en psychiatrie: Bilan après quatre années de mise en œuvre de la loi du 5 juillet 2011 [Compulsory psychiatric treatment: An assessment of the situation four years after the implementation of the act of 5 July 2011]. Issues in Health Economics, 222, 1–8.
14.
Collectif Contrast. (2015). La régulation des pratiques contraignantes de soin en santé mentale: Perspectives pour une approche interdisciplinaire [Regulation of coercive practices in mental health care: Perspectives for an interdisciplinary approach]. In V.AzimiP.Hennion-JacquetG.Koubi (Eds.), L’institution psychiatrique au prisme du droit. La folie entre administration et justice (pp. 229–245). Éditions Panthéon-Assas.
15.
DegenerT. (2017). A new human rights model of disability. In della FinaV.CeraR.PalmisanoG. (Eds.), The United Nations convention on the rights of persons with disabilities: A commentary (pp. 42–57). Springer International.
16.
DeweyJ. (2012). 1927]. The public and its problems. Penn State University Press.
17.
DudleyM.SiloveD.DaleF. (Eds.). (2012). Mental health and human rights: Vision, praxis and courage. Oxford University Press.
18.
EhrlichE. (1936). Fundamental principles of the sociology of law. Harvard University Press.
19.
EwickP.SilbeyS. S. (1998). The common place of law: Stories from everyday life. University of Chicago Press.
20.
EyraudB. (2013). Protéger et rendre capable [To protect and to make capable]. Éres.
21.
EyraudB.SaettaS.TaranI.CobbautJ.-P. (2018). La participation des personnes en situation de handicap au débat démocratique: Retours sur une démarche collaborative autour de la CDPH [Participation of persons with disabilities in democratic debate: Looking back on a participative approach about UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities]. Participations, 22(3), 109–138.
22.
Fals BordaO. (1999). David Kinsey dialogue series 1: The origins and challenges of participatory action research. Center for International Education, University of Massachusetts.
23.
FelstinerW. L. F.AbelR. L.SaratA. (1980). The emergence and transformation of disputes: Naming, blaming, claiming. Law & Society Review, 15(3/4), 631–654.
24.
FlickU. (2011). Mixing methods, triangulation and integrated research: Challenges for qualitative research in a world of crisis. In DenzinN.GiardinaM. (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry and global crises (pp. 132–152). Left Coast Press.
25.
FlynnE. (2019). The rejection of capacity assessments in favor of respect for will and preferences: The radical promise of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. World Psychiatry, 18(1), 34–41.
26.
FlynnE.Arstein-KerslakeA.de BhailísC.SerraM. L. (2018). Global perspectives on legal capacity reform. Routledge.
27.
FreemanM.KolappaK.AlmeidaJ. M. C.(de) KleinmanA.MakhashvikiN.PhakathiS.SaracenoB.ThornicroftG. (2015). Reversing hard won victories in the name of human rights: A critique of the General Comment on Article 12 of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. The Lancet Psychiatry, 2(9), 844–850.
28.
JesteD.EglitG.PalmerB.MartinisJ.BlanckP.SaksE. (2018). An overview of supported decision in serious mental illnesses. Psychiatry: Interpersonal and Biological Processes, 81(1), 28–40.
McDonaldK. E.WilliamsonP.WeissS.AdyaM.BlanckP. (2015). The march goes on: Community access for people with disabilities. Journal of Community Psychology, 43(3), 348–363.
31.
OllertonJ.HorsfallD. (2012). Rights to research: Utilizing the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities as an inclusive participatory action research tool. Disability & Society, 28(5), 616–630.
32.
RaisioH.ValkamaK.PeltolaE. (2014). Disability and deliberative democracy: Towards involving the whole human spectrum in public deliberation. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 16(1), 77–97.
33.
ReasonP.BradburyH. (Eds.). (2008). The SAGE handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice. Sage.
34.
ShogrenK. A.WehmeyerM. L.MartinisJ.BlanckP. (2018). Supported decision-making: Theory, research, and practice to enhance self-determination and quality of life. Cambridge University Press.
35.
SzmuklerG. (2019). “Capacity,” “best interests,” “will and preferences” and the UN convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. World Psychiatry, 18(1), 34–41.
36.
TurnerB. S. (1993). Outline of a sociology of human rights. Sociology, 27(3), 489–512.
ZarbG. (1992). On the road to Damascus: First steps towards changing the relations of research production. Disability, Handicap & Society, 7(2), 125–138.
39.
ZaskJ. (2011). Participer: Essai sur les formes démocratiques de la participation [To participate: An essay on democratic forms of participation]. Le Bord de l’eau.
