The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) opened the doors to access and enhanced the civil rights of people with disabilities. However, a lack of accessibility to all segments of society continues throughout the United States and is frequently described by people with disabilities as a leading cause for limited participation. Beliefs and attitudes about disability can affect critical decisions regarding inclusion and people with disabilities’ civil rights. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to explore support and opposition to the ADA among nondisabled people. We had the following research questions: (a) What is the relationship between disability prejudice and support for the ADA? and (b) When controlling for disability prejudice, what other factors lead people to support the ADA? To do so, we examined secondary data from approximately 13,000 participants from all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia. Findings from this study revealed that people who oppose the ADA are significantly more prejudiced toward people with disabilities than people who support the ADA. Understanding and becoming aware of attitudes and prejudice toward persons with disabilities can be a first step toward dispelling such beliefs and possibly a priori step to achieving the intent and spirit of the ADA.
AabergV. A. (2012). A path to greater inclusivity through understanding implicit attitudes toward disability. The Journal of Nursing Education, 51(9), 505–510. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20120706-02
Americans with Disabilities Act, Pub. L. No. 101-336 § 302[a], 104 Stat. 328 Stat. (1990).
4.
Americans with Disabilities Amendments Act of 2008, Pub. L. No. 110-325, 122 Stat. 3553 Stat. (2008).
5.
AmodioD. M.MendozaS. A. (2011). Implicit intergroup bias: Cognitive, affective, and motivational underpinnings. In GawronskiB.PayneB. K. (Eds.), Handbook of implicit social cognition: Measurement, theory, and applications (pp. 353–374). Guilford Press.
6.
AntonakR.LivnehH. (2000). Measurement of attitudes towards persons with disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation, 22(5), 211–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/096382800296782
7.
BakerP. M.LindenM. A.LaForceS. S.RutledgeJ.GoughnourK. P. (2018). Barriers to employment participation of individuals with disabilities: Addressing the impact of employer (mis) perception and policy. American Behavioral Scientist, 62(5), 657–675. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218768868
8.
BataviaA. I.SchrinerK. (2001). The Americans With Disabilities Act as engine of social change: Models of disability and the potential of a civil rights approach. Policy Studies Journal, 29(4), 690–702. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2001.tb02122.x
9.
Berkeley Planning Associates. (1982). A study of accomodations provided to handicapped employees by federal contractors (Vol. 1). US Department of Labor, Employment Standards Administration.
10.
BezyakJ. L.SabellaS. A.GattisR. H. (2017). Public transportation: An investigation of barriers for people with disabilities. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 28(1), 52–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/1044207317702070
BrattonK. A.HaynieK. L. (1999). Agenda setting and legislative success in state legislatures: The effects of gender and race. The Journal of Politics, 61(3), 658–679. https://doi.org/10.2307/2647822
BrookmanD. E. (2013). Black politicians are more intrinsically motivated to advance Blacks’ interests. American Journal of Political Science, 57(3), 521–536. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12018
15.
CampbellF. K. (2009). Contours of ableism: The production of disability and abledness. Palgrave MacMillan.
16.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2009). Prevalence and most common causes of disability among adults—United States, 2005. MMWR: Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 58(16), 421–426.
De Campos Velho MartelL. (2011). Reasonable accommodation: The new concept from an inclusive constitutional perspective. SUR: International Journal on Human Rights, 8(14), 85–111.
22.
DillerM. (2000). Judicial backlash, the ADA, and the civil rights model. Berkeley Journal of Employment & Labor Law, 21, 19–52.
23.
DrainoniM.-L.Lee-HoodE.TobiasC.BachmanS. S.AndrewJ.MaiselsL. (2006). Cross-disability experiences of barriers to health-care access: Consumer perspectives. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 17(2), 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/10442073060170020101
24.
DrumC.McClainM.Horner-JohnsonW.TaitanoG. (2011). Health disparities chart book on disability and racial and ethnic status in the United States. University of New Hampshire, Institute on Disability.
EmensE. F. (2013). Disabling attitudes: U.S. disability law and the ADA Amendments. In DavisL. J. (Ed.), The disability studies reader (4 ed., pp. 42–57). Routledge.
27.
FeldblumC. R. (2008). The Americans with Disabilities Act and the ADA Amendments Act of 2008. (Statement of Chai R. Feldblum, Geo. UL Center). [110th]. S. Comm. on Health, Education, Labor & Pensions. Georgetown Law, Georgetown University Law Center.
28.
FeldmanS.ZallerJ. (1992). The political culture of ambivalence: Ideological responses to the welfare state. American Journal of Political Science, 36(1), 268–307.
29.
FinemanM. A. (2010). The vulnerable subject and the responsive state. Emory Law Journal, 60, 1–42.
30.
FriedmanC. (2016). Aversive ableism: Subtle prejudice and discrimination towards disabled people (Doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10027/20940
31.
FriedmanC. (2018). Aversive ableism: Modern prejudice towards disabled people. Review of Disability Studies: An International Journal, 14(4).
32.
FriedmanC. (2019). Mapping ableism: A two-dimensional model of explicit and implicit disability attitudes. Canadian Journal of Disability Studies, 8(3), 95–120. https://doi.org/10.15353/cjds.v8i3
33.
FriedmanC.AwsumbJ. (2019). The symbolic ableism scale. The Review of Disability Studies: An International Journal, 15(1).
34.
GaertnerS. L.DovidioJ. F. (1986). The aversive form of racism. In GaertnerS. L.DovidioJ. F. (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism: Theory and research (pp. 61–89). Academic Press.
35.
Garland-ThomsonR. (2017). Disability bioethics: From theory to practice. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 27(2), 323–339.
36.
GoldP. B.OireS. N.FabianE. S.WewiorskiN. J. (2012). Negotiating reasonable workplace accommodations: Perspectives of employers, employees with disabilities, and rehabilitation service providers. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 37(1), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.3233/JVR-2012-0597
37.
GouldR.HarrisS. P.CaldwellK.FujiuraG.JonesR.OjokP.EnriquezK. P. (2015). Beyond the law: A review of knowledge, attitudes and perceptions in ADA employment research. Disability Studies Quarterly, 35(3). https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v35i3.4935
38.
GreenwaldA. G.McGheeD.SchwartzJ. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1464–1480. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.74.6.1464
39.
GreenwaldA. G.NosekB. A.BanajiM. R. (2003). Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. an improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(12), 197–216. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.197
40.
HallerB.DorriesB.RahnJ. (2006). Media labeling versus the US disability community identity: A study of shifting cultural language. Disability & Society, 21(1), 61–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687590500375416
41.
HarpurP. (2014). Naming, blaming and claiming ablism: The lived experiences of lawyers and advocates with disabilities. Disability & Society, 29(8), 1234–1247. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2014.923749
42.
HarrisJ. (2019). The aesthetics of disability. Columbia Law Review, 119(4), 895–971.
43.
HeadL.BakerP. (2005). Workplace accommodations and ADA Title I: Policy and the metrics of “reasonable” [Paper presentation]. Technology and Persons with Disabilities Conference, Northridge, CA, United States.
44.
HendricksD.BatisteL. C.HirshA.SchartzH.BlanckP. (2005). Cost and effectiveness of accommodations in the workplace: Preliminary results of a nationwide study. Disability Studies Quarterly, 25(4). https://dsq-sds.org/article/view/623/800
HenryP. J.SearsD. O. (2008). Symbolic and modern racism. In MooreJ. H. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of race and racism (pp. 111–117). Macmillan Reference.
47.
HirschbergerG.FlorianV.MikulincerM. (2005). Fear and compassion: A terror management analysis of emotional reactions to physical disability. Rehabilitation Psychology, 50(3), 246–257. https://doi.org/10.1037/0090-5550.50.3.246
48.
IezzoniL. I.O’DayB. (2006). More than ramps: A guide to improving health care quality and access for people with disabilities. Oxford University Press.
49.
JetteA. M.FieldM. J. (2007). The future of disability in America. National Academies Press.
50.
JohnsonM. (2003). Make them go away: Clint Eastwood, Christopher Reeve and the case against disability rights. Advocado Press.
51.
JohnsonM. (2007). Before its time: Public perception of disability rights, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the future of access and accommodation. Washington University Journal of Law & Policy, 23, 121–150.
52.
KarpinskiA.HiltonJ. L. (2001). Attitudes and the implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(5), 774–788. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.5.774
53.
Kessler Foundation/National Organization on Disability. (2010). The 2010 survey of Americans with Disabilities. Harris Interactive.
54.
KrahnG. L.WalkerD. K.Correa-De-AraujoR. (2015). Persons with disabilities as an unrecognized health disparity population. American Journal of Public Health, 105(S2), S198–S206.
55.
LaguT.IezzoniL. I.LindenauerP. K. (2014). The axes of access—Improving care for patients with disabilities. The New England Journal of Medicine., 370(19), 1847–1851.
MalhotraR.RoweM. (2013). Exploring disability identity and disability rights through narratives: Finding a voice of their own. Routledge.
58.
McMahonB. T.RoesslerR.RumrillP. D.HurleyJ. E.WestS. L.ChanF.CarlsonL. (2008). Hiring discrimination against people with disabilities under the ADA: Characteristics of charging parties. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 18(2), Article 122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-008-9133-4
59.
Mendes de LeonC. F.BarnesL. L.BieniasJ. L.SkarupskiK. A.EvansD. A. (2005). Racial disparities in disability: Recent evidence from self-reported and performance-based disability measures in a population-based study of older adults. The Journals of Gerontology Series B, 60(5), S263–S271. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/60.5.S263
60.
NosekB. A.SmythF. L.HansenJ. J.DevosT.LindnerN. M.RanganathK. A.. . . BanajiM. R. (2007). Pervasiveness and correlates of implicit attitudes and stereotypes. European Review of Social Psychology, 1(1), 1–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280701489053
OryM.HoffmanM. K.HawkinsM.SannerB.MockenhauptR. (2003). Challenging aging stereotypes: Strategies for creating a more active society. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 25(3), 164–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(03)00181-8
PhelanS. M.PuhlR. M.BurkeS. E.HardemanR.DovidioJ. F.NelsonD.. . . van RynM. (2015). The mixed impact of medical school on medical students’ implicit and expliciit weight bias. Medical Education, 49(10), 983–992. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12770
65.
PruettS. R. (2004). A psychometric validaion of a disability attitude implicit association test (Doctoral disseration). University of Wisconsin Madison.
66.
PruettS. R.ChanF. (2006). The development and psychometric validation of the Disability Attitude Implicit Association Test. Rehabilitation Psychology, 51(3), 202–213. https://doi.org/10.1037/0090-5550.51.3.202
SabellaS. A.BezyakJ. L. (2019). Barriers to public transportation and employment: A national survey of individuals with disabilities. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 50(3), 174–185. https://doi.org/10.1891/0047-2220.50.3.174
69.
SchaffnerB. F.MacWilliamsM.NtetaT. (2018). Understanding white polarization in the 2016 vote for president: The sobering role of racism and sexism. Political Science Quarterly, 133(1), 9–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/polq.12737
SchwartzC.Armony-SivanR. (2001). Students’ attitudes to the inclusion of people with disabilities in the community. Disability & Society, 16(3), 403–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687590120045978
72.
SearsD. O.HenryP. J.KostermanR. (2000). Egalitarian values and the origins of contemporary American racism. In SearsD. O.SidaniusJ.BoboL. (Eds.), Racialized politics: The debate about racism in America (pp. 75–117). University of Chicago Press.
73.
SmeedingT.ButlerR.SchaberG. (2000). The consequences of population aging for society [Paper presentation]. Workshop report. International Longevity Center, New York, NY, United States.
74.
Son HingL.Chung-YanG.HamiltonL.ZannaM. (2008). A two-dimensional model that employs explicit and implicit attitudes to characterize prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(6), 971–987. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.6.971
75.
SwitzerJ. (2003). Disabled rights: American disability policy and the fight for equality. Georgetown University Press.
76.
ThomasC. (2004). Rescuing a social relational understanding of disability. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 6(1), 22–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/15017410409512637
77.
ThorpeR. J.McClearyR.SmolenJ. R.WhitfieldK. E.SimonsickE. M.LaVeistT. (2014). Racial disparities in disability among older adults: Finding from the exploring health disparities in integrated communities study. Journal of Aging and Health, 26(8), 1261–1279. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898264314534892
78.
TilleyJ.EvansG. (2014). Ageing and generational effects on vote choice: Combining cross-sectional and panel data to estimate APC effects. Electoral Studies, 33, 19–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2013.06.007
WhiteM. J.JacksonV.GordonP. (2006). Implicit and explicit attitudes toward athletes with disabilities. Journal of Rehabilitation, 72(3), 33–40.
81.
XuK.NosekB.GreenwaldA. (2014). Psychology data from the race implicit association test on the project implicit demo website. Journal of Open Psychology Data, 2(1), e1–e3. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.5334/jopd.ac
