Family and professional collaboration is beneficial to students, families, and educators. The importance of such collaboration was recognized for families of students with disabilities, resulting in provisions in the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) that mandate parental participation in educational planning. Despite the benefits of family and professional collaboration and the IDEA mandate, many parents disagree with the educational planning decisions provided to their children and request due process hearings. Parents perceive a lack of opportunity to provide input and/or to disagree with schools’ perspectives. Parents of early childhood students report significant concerns about their child’s readiness for the transition to kindergarten and their limited role in transition planning as their children prepared to enter preschool programs. The purpose of this article was to examine the issues identified in parental complaints in early childhood special education (ECSE) through a qualitative content analysis of recent court cases. The results revealed six themes related to current issues in ECSE programs. We conclude with several recommendations for state policy makers to improve services in ECSE based on the DEC Recommended Practices.
ApplequistK. L. (2009). Parent perspective of special education: Framing of experiences for prospective educators. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 28(2), 3–16.
2.
Avon Grove School District, 117 LRP 47505 (SEA PA, 2017).
Baltimore County Public Schools, 116 LRP 19889 (SEA MD 2015).
5.
BartonE.MooreH.SquiresJ. (2012). Preparing speech language pathology students to work in early childhood. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 32(1), 4–13.
6.
BartonE.SmithB. (2015). Advancing high-quality preschool inclusion. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 35(2), 69–78.
7.
BlackwellW. H.BlackwellV. V. (2015). A longitudinal study of special education due process hearings in Massachusetts: Issues, representation, and student characteristics. SAGE Open, 5, 1–11.
8.
Booth-LaForceC.KellyJ. F. (2004). Childcare patterns and issues for families of preschool children with disabilities. Infants & Young Children: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Special Care Practices, 17(1), 5–16.
9.
Brandywine Heights Area School District, 12 ECLPR 77 (PA SEA 2014).
10.
BurkeM. M.GoldmanS. E. (2015). Identifying the associated factors of mediation and due process in families of students with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45(5), 1345–1353.
D. L. v. District of Columbia, 70 IDELR 59 (DC Cir 2017).
24.
East Whittier City School District, 117 LRP 43286 (SEA CA 2017).
25.
Elk Grove Unified School District, 12 ECLPR 57 (SEA CA 2014).
26.
Elwyn, Inc. Seeds El Program for S.D. of Philadelphia, 117 LRP 34718 (SEA PA 2017).
27.
EtscheidtS. (2003). Ascertaining the adequacy, scope and utility of district evaluations. Exceptional Children, 69(2), 227–247.
28.
EtscheidtS. (2006a). Least restrictive and natural environments for young children with disabilities: A legal analysis of issues. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 26(3), 167–178.
29.
EtscheidtS. (2006b). Progress monitoring: Legal issues and recommendations for IEP team. Teaching Exceptional Children, 38(3), 56–60.
30.
FersterD. (2010). Broken promises: When does a school’s failure to implement an Individualized Education Program deny a disabled student a free and appropriate public education?Buffalo Public Interest Law Journal, 28, 71–180.
31.
FoxL.DunlapG.HemmeterM. L.JosephG. E.StrainP. S. (2003). The Teaching Pyramid: A model for supporting social competence and preventing challenging behavior in young children. Young Children, 58(4), 48–52.
32.
Garfield Board of Education, 62 IDELR 130, (SEA NJ 2013).
33.
GarriottP. P.WandryD.SnyderL. (2000). Teachers as parents, parents as children: What’s wrong with this picture?Preventing School Failure, 45(1), 37–43.
34.
GuoY.SawyerB. E.JusticeL. M.KaderavekJ. N. (2013). Quality of the literacy environment in inclusive early childhood special education classrooms. Journal of Early Intervention, 35(1), 40–60.
35.
HemmeterM. L.FoxL.SnyderP. (2014). A tiered model for promoting social-emotional competence and addressing challenging behavior. In BuysseV.Peisner-FeinbergE. S. (Eds.), Handbook of response to intervention in early childhood (pp. 85–101). Brookes.
36.
HemmeterM. L.FoxL.StrainP. S.HardyJ. K.JosephJ. D. (2019). Designing and Implementing Tier 2 instructional supports to promote social-emotional outcomes. In CartaJ.YoungR. M. (Eds.), Multi-tiered systems of support for young children: Driving change in early education (pp. 131–152). Brookes.
37.
HessR. S.MolinaA. M.KozleskiE. B. (2006). Until somebody hears me: Parent voice and advocacy in special educational decision making. British Journal of Special Education, 33(3), 148–157.
38.
HsiehH. F.ShannonS. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288.
39.
Independent School District #482, 10 ECLPR 55 (SEA MN 2012).
40.
Indian River School District, 8 ECLPR 62 (SEA DE 2011).
41.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Regulations of 2006, 34 C.F.R. § 300.1 et seq. (2006).
42.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA), 20 U.S.C. § 1401 et seq. (2004).
43.
In re: Student with a Disability, 116 LRP 25857 (SEA SD 2015b).
44.
In re: Student with a Disability, 12 ECLPR 87 (SEA NY 2014).
45.
In re: Student with a Disability, 12 ELCPR 68 (SEA IL 2015a).
46.
Irvine Unified School District, 12 ECLPR 24 (SEA CA 2014).
47.
JungA. W. (2011). Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) and barriers for parents from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds. Multicultural Education, 18(3), 21–25.
48.
KeiltyB. (2016). The early intervention guidebook for families and professionals: Partnering for success (2nd ed.). Teachers College Press.
49.
KrippendorffK. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). SAGE.
50.
KuhnM.MarvinC.KnocheL. (2017). In it for the long haul: Parent–teacher partnerships for addressing preschool children’s challenging behaviors. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 37(2), 81–93.
51.
LaskyB.Dunnick-KargeB. (2011). Involvement of language minority parents of children with disabilities in their child’s school achievement. Multicultural Education, 18(3), 29–34.
52.
L.M.H. v. Arizona Dept. of Ed., 68 IDELR 41 (DC AZ 2016).
53.
LohmannM. J.HathcoteA. R.BootheK. A. (2018). Addressing the barriers to family-school collaboration. International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education, 10(1), 25–31.
54.
MacyM.Hoyt-GonzalesK. (2007). A linked system approach to early childhood special education. Teaching Exceptional Children, 39(3), 40–44.
55.
MarshallC.RossmanG. B. (2011). Designing qualitative research (5th ed.). SAGE.
56.
McBrideB. A.BaeJ. H.WrightM. S. (2010). An examination of family-school partnership initiatives in rural prekindergarten programs. Early Education and Development, 13(1), 107–127.
57.
McIntryeL. L.EckertT. L.FieseB. H.DiGennaro-ReedF. D.WildengerL. K. (2010). Family concerns surrounding kindergarten transition: A comparison of students in special and general education. Early Childhood Education Journal, 38(4), 259–263.
58.
Montgomery County Intermediate Unit, 11 ECLPR 88 (SEA PA 2014).
59.
Montgomery County Intermediate Unit No. 23 v C.M. et al., 71 IDELR 11 (ED PA 2017).
60.
MorganP. L.FarkasG.HillemeierM. M.LiH.PunW. H.CookM. (2017). Cross-cohort evidence of disparities in service receipt for speech or language impairments. Exceptional Children, 84(1), 27–41.
61.
MorganP. L.HammerC. S.FarkasG.HillemeierM. M.MaczugaS.CookM.MoranoaS. (2016). Who receives speech/language services by 5 years of age in the United States?American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 25(2), 183–199.
62.
MuellerT. G.CarranzaF. (2011). An examination of special education due process hearings. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 22, 131–139.
63.
MuellerT. G.VickA. M. (2017). An investigation of facilitated Individualized Education Program meeting practice: Promising procedures that foster family–professional collaboration. Teacher Education and Special Education, 42(1), 67–81.
64.
NoggleA. K.StitesM. L. (2018). Inclusion and preschoolers who are typically developing: The lived experience. Early Childhood Education Journal, 46(5), 511–522.
65.
OlveraP.OlveraV. I. (2012). Optimizing home-school collaboration: Strategies for school psychologists and Latino parent involvement for positive mental health outcomes. Contemporary School Psychology, 16, 77–87.
66.
PattonM. Q. (2001). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (2nd ed.). SAGE.
67.
Penn-Trafford School District, 12 ECLPR 76 (SEA PA 2015).
68.
Philadelphia School District, 12 ECLPR 48 (SEA PA 2014) [affirmed ED PA 66 IDELR 247].
69.
PodveyM. C.HinojosaJ.KoeningK. P. (2013). Reconsidering insider status for families during the transition from early intervention to preschool special education. The Journal of Special Education, 46(4), 211–222.
70.
Portland School District 1J, 117 LRP 28073, (SEA OR 2017).
71.
Prince George’s County Public Schools, 12 ECLPR 6 (SEA MD 2014).
72.
Region 14 Board of Education, 12 ECLPR 49 (SEA CT 2014).
73.
ReichowB.BoydB. A.BartonE.OdomS. L. (Eds.). (2016). Handbook of early childhood special education. Springer.
74.
RispoliK. M.HawleyL. R.ClintonM. C. (2018). Family background and parent-school interactions in parent involvement for at-risk preschool children with disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 52(1), 1–11.
75.
Riverside Unified School District, 70 IDELR 82 (SEA CA 2017).
RousB. S.HallarnR. A. (2012). Transition services for young children with disabilities: Research and future directions. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 31(4), 232–240.
78.
SchillingJ. (2006). On the pragmatics of qualitative assessment: Designing the process for content analysis. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 22(1), 28–37.
79.
SchischkaJ.RawlinsonC.HamiltonR. (2012). Factors affecting the transition to school for young children with disabilities. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 37(4), 1523.
80.
School District of Philadelphia, 12 ECLPR 5 (SEA PA 2014).
81.
School District of Philadelphia, 12 ECPLR 108 (SEA PA 2015).
82.
School District of Philadelphia v. Kirsh, 66 IDELR 247 (ED PA 2015)
83.
School District of Philadelphia v. Post, 70 IDELR 96 (ED PA 2017).
84.
Shaun M. v. Hamamoto, 53 IDELR 185 (DC HW 2009).
85.
SheridanS. M.SmithT. E.Moorman KimE.BeretvasS. N.ParkS. (2019). A meta-analysis of family-school interventions and children’s social-emotional functioning. Review of Educational Research, 89(2), 296–332.
86.
SnellA. M. S. (2018). Parent-school engagement in a public elementary school in southern Arizona. School Community Journal, 28(2), 113–137.
87.
StonerJ. B.BockS. J.ThompsonJ. R.AngellM. E.HeylB. S.CrowleyE. P. (2005). Welcome to our world: Parent perceptions of interactions between parents of young children with ASD and educational professionals. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 20(1), 39–51.
WakelinM. M. (2008). Challenging disparities in special education: Moving parents from disempowered team members to ardent advocate. Northwestern Journal of Law and Social Policy, 3(2), 263–288.
91.
WalshB. A.RomoG.JeonH.-J. (2018). Parental perspectives on transition to kindergarten. Early Childhood Education Journal, 46(6), 655–663.
92.
WelchonsL. W.McIntyreL. L. (2015). The transition to kindergarten for children with and without disabilities: An investigation of parent and teacher concerns and involvement. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 35(1), 52–62.
93.
YellM. L.CollinsJ.KumpieneG.BatemanD. (2020). The Individualized Education Program: Procedural and substantive requirements. Teaching Exceptional Children, 25(5), 304–318.
94.
ZimmermanK. N.LedfordJ. R.BartonE. E. (2017). Using visual activity schedules for young children with challenging behavior. Journal of Early Intervention, 39(4), 339–358.
95.
ZirkelP. A.HetrickA. (2017). Which procedural parts of the IEP process are the most judicially vulnerable?Exceptional Children, 83(2), 219–235.
