Organizational Policies and Personnel Factors That Are Incentives for and Challenges to Collaboration as Identified by Statewide Transition Supervisors

Abstract

In the United States, the Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act (2004) and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 as amended in the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (2014) require special educators and vocational rehabilitation counselors to plan and coordinate transition services for students with disabilities. Regardless of the legislative mandates, major challenges remain for effective collaboration. The purpose of this study was to investigate statewide special education and vocational rehabilitation counseling transition supervisors’ insights on the policies that promote or present barriers to effective collaboration. Forty-eight statewide transition supervisors wrote a total of 175 comments that were analyzed using inductive content analysis. Organizational and personnel factors were identified, and specific examples of noteworthy indicators of collaboration are presented. Recommendations are offered to address the lack of policies and incentives for transition collaboration.

Keywords

transition collaboration vocational rehabilitation counselors special educators policy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agran

Cain

H. M.

Cavin

M. D.

(2002). Enhancing the involvement of rehabilitation counselors in the transition process. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 25(2), 141–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/088572880202500204

Bandura

(1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman & Company.

Bohm

(2004). On dialogue. Routledge.

Carter

E. W.

Bumble

J. L.

(2018). The promise and possibilities of community conversations: Expanding employment opportunities for people with disabilities. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 28(4), 195–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/1044207317739408

Cashman

Linehan

P. C.

Purcell

Rosser

Schultz

Skalski

(2014). Leading by convening: A blue print for authentic engagement. National Association of State Directors of Special Education.

Creswell

J. W.

(2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE.

Creswell

J. W.

Miller

D. L.

(2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice, 39, 124–130.

Degeneffe

C. E.

Sax

C. L.

Tucker

M. S.

Carlton-Bahm

Torok

Morpeth

(2018). Project Pendleton: Supporting Marine Corps family caregivers of persons with developmental disabilities. Journal of Rehabilitation, 84(1), 51–60.

Fabian

Dong

Simonsen

Luecking

D. M.

Deschamps

(2016). Service system collaboration in transition: An empirical exploration of its effects on rehabilitation outcomes for students with disabilities. Journal of Rehabilitation, 82(3), 3–10.

10.

Frey

B. B.

Lohmeier

J. H.

Lee

S. W.

Tollefson

(2006). Measuring collaboration among grant partners. American Journal of Evaluation, 273(3), 383–392. https://doi.org/10.177/1098214006290356

11.

Gajda

(2004). Utilizing collaboration theory to evaluate strategic alliances. American Journal of Evaluation, 25(1), 65–77.

12.

Haber

M. G.

Mazzotti

V. L.

Mustian

A. L.

Rowe

D. A.

Bartholomew

A. L.

Test

D. W.

Fowler

C. H.

(2016). What works, when, for whom, and with whom: A meta-analytic review of predictors of postsecondary success for students with disabilities. Review of Educational Research, 86(1), 123–162.

13.

Halpern

(1985). Transition: A look at the foundations. Exceptional Children, 51, 479–486.

14.

Honeycutt

Bardos

McLeod

(2014). Bridging the gap: A comparative assessment of vocational rehabilitation agency practices with transition-age youth (DRC Working Paper No. working paper # 2014-04). Mathematica Policy Research. https://www.mathematica.org/our-publications-and-findings/publications/bridging-the-gap-a-comparative-assessment-of-vocational-rehabilitation-agency-practices-with

15.

Honeycutt

Thompkins

Bardos

Stern

(2015). State differences in the vocational rehabilitation experiences of transition-age youth with disabilities. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 42(1), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.3233/JVR-140721

16.

Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act [IDEA], Pub L. No. 101-146, 104 Stat. 1142 (2004).

17.

Isaacs

(1999). Dialogue: And the art of thinking together. Doubleday.

18.

Izzo

M. V.

Lamb

(2003). Developing self-determination through career development activities: Implications for vocational rehabilitation counselors. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 19, 71–78.

19.

Kalchik

Oertle

(2010, May). The integral role of career development in supporting programs of study and career pathways. Transition highlights, Issue 1. Office of Community College Research and Leadership (OCCRL), University of Illinois.

20.

Kester

J. E.

(2013). Exploring interagency collaboration in a secondary transition community of practice [Doctoral dissertation, The George Washington University]. https://search.proquest.com/docview/1240671354

21.

Kohler

P. D.

(1996). The taxonomy for transition programming. University of Illinois.

22.

Lincoln

Y. S.

Guba

E. G.

(1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE.

23.

Luecking

R. G.

Fabian

E. S.

Contreary

Honeycutt

T. C.

Luecking

D. M.

(2017). Vocational rehabilitation outcomes for students participating in a model transition program. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 61, 154–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/0034355217713167

24.

Luecking

R. G.

Wittenburg

(2009). Providing supports to youth with disabilities transitioning to adulthood: Case descriptions from the Youth Transition Demonstration. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 30(3), 241–251.

25.

Meadows

Davies

Beamish

(2014). Teacher control over interagency collaboration: A roadblock for effective transitioning of youth with disabilities. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 61, 332–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2014.955788

26.

Michaels

C. A.

Ferrara

D. L.

(2005). Promoting post-school success for all: The role of collaboration in person-centered transition planning. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 16(4), 287–313.

27.

National Collaborative on Workforce and Disability/Youth. (2005). Guideposts for success. Institute on Educational Leadership. http://www.ncwd-youth.info/publications/guideposts/

28.

Neubert

D. A.

Luecking

R. G.

Fabian

E. S.

(2018). Transition practices of vocational rehabilitation counselors serving students and youth with disabilities. Rehabilitation, Research, Policy, and Practice, 32(1), 54–65.

29.

Noonan

(2014). Transition teaming: 26 strategies for interagency collaboration. Council for Exceptional Children, Division on Career Development and Transition.

30.

Noonan

P. M.

Morningstar

M. E.

Erickson

A. G.

(2008). Improving interagency collaboration: Effective strategies used by high-performing local districts and communities. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 31(3), 132–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885728808327149

31.

Noyes

D. A.

Sax

C. L.

(2004). Changing systems for transition: Students, families, and professionals working together. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 39(1), 35–44.

32.

Oertle

K. M.

Sax

C. L.

Chesley

(2017). Expectations of statewide special education and vocational rehabilitation transition leaders for their staff’s collaboration activities. Journal of Rehabilitation, 83(3), 3–20.

33.

Oertle

K. M.

Sax

C. L.

Chesley

(2018). Characteristics and descriptions of secondary transition content on special education and rehabilitation graduate program websites. Rehabilitation Research, Policy, and Education, 32(1), 2–19.

34.

Oertle

K. M.

Seader

K. J.

(2015). Research and practical considerations for rehabilitation transition collaboration. Journal of Rehabilitation, 81(2), 3–18.

35.

Oertle

K. M.

Trach

J. S.

(2007). Interagency collaboration: The importance of rehabilitation professionals’ involvement in transition. Journal of Rehabilitation, 73, 36–44.

36.

Oertle

K. M.

Trach

J. S.

Plotner

A. J.

(2013). Rehabilitation professionals’ expectations for transition and interagency collaboration. Journal of Rehabilitation, 79, 25–35.

37.

Park

Bouck

(2018). In-school service predictors of employment for individuals with intellectual disability. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 77, 68–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2018.03.014

38.

Parker-Katz

Cushing

L. S.

Athamanah

(2018). Fostering transition leadership to promote partnerships with families and communities. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 28, 244–254.

39.

Patton

M. Q.

(1999). Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Services Research, 34(5 Part II), 1189–1208.

40.

Peterson

R. A.

(2013). Open- and closed-end questions. In Peterson

R. A.

(Ed.), Constructing effective questionnaires. (pp. 29–44). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483349022

41.

Plotner

A. J.

Trach

J. S.

Strauser

D. R.

(2012). Vocational rehabilitation counselors’ identified transition competencies: Perceived importance, frequency, and preparedness. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 55(3), 135–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0034355211427950

42.

Povenmire-Kirk

Diegelmann

Crump

Schnorr

Test

Flowers

Aspel

(2015). Implementing CIRCLES: A new model for interagency collaboration in transition planning. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 42(1), 51–65. https://doi.org/10.3233/JVR-140723

43.

Povenmire-Kirk

T. C.

Test

D. W.

Flowers

C. P.

Diegelmann

K. M.

Bunch-Crump

Kemp-Inman

Goodnight

C. I.

(2018). CIRCLES: Building an interagency network for transition planning. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 49(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.3233/JVR-180953

44.

Rehabilitation Act and its amendment, Pub. L. No. 93-112, 87 Stat. 355 (1973).

45.

Riesen

Oertle

K. M.

(2019). Developing paid and unpaid work-based learning experiences for transition-age students with intellectual and development disabilities: An exploratory of study of employers’ perspectives. Journal of Rehabilitation, 85, 27–36.

46.

Riesen

Schultz

Morgan

Kupferman

(2014). School-to-work barriers as identified by special educators, vocational rehabilitation counselors, and community rehabilitation professionals. Journal of Rehabilitation, 80(1), 33–44.

47.

Sax

C. L.

Noyes

D. A.

(2008). Interagency collaboration: It takes communication to support transitions. In Rusch

F. R.

(Ed.), Beyond high school: Preparing adolescents for tomorrow’s challenges (2nd ed., pp. 160–175). Pearson Education.

48.

Swenson

Lakin

(2014). A wicked problem: Can governments be fair to families living with disabilities? Family Relations, 63(1), 185–191. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12056

49.

Szymanski

E. M.

(1994). Transition: Life-span, life-space considerations for empowerment. Exceptional Children, 60, 402–410.

50.

Test

D. W.

Mazzotti

V. L.

Mustian

A. L.

Fowler

C. H.

Kortering

Kohler

(2009). Evidence-based secondary transition predictors for improving postschool outcomes for students with disabilities. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32(3), 160–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885728809346960

51.

Thomson

A. M.

Perry

J. L.

Miller

T. K.

(2007). Conceptualizing and measuring collaboration. Journal of Public Administration Research, 19, 23–56. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum036

52.

Thomson

A. M.

Perry

J. L.

Miller

T. K.

(2008). Linking collaboration processes and outcomes. Foundations for advancing empirical theory. In Bingham

L. B.

(Ed.), Big ideas in collaborative public management (pp. 97–120). M. E. Sharpe, Inc.

53.

United States Government Accountability Office. (2018, February). Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act. Federal agencies’ collaboration generally reflected leading practices, but could be enhanced. GAO-18-171. http://www.gao.gov

54.

Wenger

(1998). Communities of Practice: Learning as a social system. Systems Thinker, 9, 1–10.

55.

Wenger

(2000). Communities of Practice and social learning systems. Organization, 7(2), 225–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/135050840072002

56.

Whittemore

Chase

S. K.

Mandle

C. L.

(2001). Validity in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 11, 522–537.

57.

Will

(1984, March/April). Bridges from school to working life. Programs for the handicapped clearinghouse on the handicapped. https://mn.gov/mnddc/parallels2/pdf/80s/84/84-PFH-DOE.pdf

58.

Will

(1986). Educating children with learning problems: A shared responsibility. Exceptional Children, 52, 411–415.

59.

Williams-Diehm

K. L.

Rowe

D. A.

Johnson

M. C.

Guilmeus

J. F.

(2018). A systematic analysis of transition coursework required for special education licensure. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 41(1), 16–26.

60.

The Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act [WIOA] Pub. L. No. 113-128, 128 Stat. 1425. (2014).