Subminimum wage is a prominent and problematic issue affecting the lives of many people with disabilities. For this reason, the aim of this study was to identify the correlates of fair-wages (at least minimum wage) for people with disabilities—which factors facilitate and hinder people with disabilities’ access to fair-wages. We utilized Personal Outcome Measures® interview data from approximately 1,500 people with disabilities to examine how individual, employment, and organizational-level factors correlate with people with disabilities’ access to fair-wages. Binary logistic regression models revealed at the individual-level support needs, guardianship, and residence type all significantly correlate with people with disabilities’ odds of receiving fair-wages. In addition, the ability to experience a number of employment options, as well as decide where to work, produce higher odds of having fair-wages. Finally, our findings also revealed the key role service organizations can play in facilitating people with disabilities’ access to fair-wages. Attention to the facilitators that promote access to fair-wages for people with disabilities, and the barriers that hinder this access is one of the first steps toward ending this discrimination against people with disabilities.
American Network of Community Options and Resources. (2014). Ensuring a sustainable work force for people with disabilities: Minimum wage increases can not leave direct support professionals behind.
2.
Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990, Pub. L. No. 101-336, 104 Stat. 328 (1990).
3.
BogenschutzM. D.HewittA.NordD.HepperlenR. (2014). Direct support workforce supporting individuals with IDD: Current wages, benefits, and stability. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 52(5), 317–329. https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-52.5.317
4.
BraddockD.HempR.RizzoloM. C.TanisE. S.HafferL.WuJ. (2015). The state of the states in intellectual and developmental disabilities: Emerging from the great recession. American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.
5.
ButterworthJ.HallA.HoffD.MiglioreA. (2007). State and international efforts to reform or eliminate the use of subminimum wage for persons with disabilities. University of Massachusetts Boston, Institute for Community Inclusion.
6.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Department of Health and Human Services. (2014, January10). Medicaid program; State plan home community-based services 5-year period for waivers provider payment reassignment home community-based setting requirements for community first choice home community-based services (HCBS) waivers. Final rule (to be codified at 42 CFR. parts 430, 431, 435, 436, 440, 441, and 447). Federal Register, 79(11), 2947–3039.
7.
CimeraR. E. (2011). Supported versus sheltered employment: Cumulative costs, hours worked, and wages earned. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 35, 85–92.
Disabled and Elderly Health Programs Group, Center for Medicaid and State Operations, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, & Department of Health and Human Services. (2015, January). Application for a §1915(c) home and community-based waiver (Version 3.5): Instructions, technical guide, and review criteria. https://wms-mmdl.cms.gov/WMS/help/35/Instructions_TechnicalGuide_V3.6.pdf
FirminM. W.OrientK. M.SteinerH.FirminR. L. (2013). Factors affect the employment longevity of staff working with clients possessing intellectual disabilities. International Journal of Business Anthropology, 4(2), 54–65.
15.
FriedmanC. (2016). Day Habilitation Services for People With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities in Medicaid Home and Community-Based Services Waivers. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 41(4), 244–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796916664337
16.
FriedmanC. (2018). Direct support professionals and quality of life of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 56(4), 234–250. https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-56.5.234
17.
FriedmanC. (2019). The move to managed care for intellectual and developmental disability services: Guidance for state Medicaid and DD Directors, and Payers. Towson, MD: CQL | The Council on Quality and Leadership.
18.
FriedmanC.Nye-LengermanK. (2018). Exploring the role of prevocational services for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities in Medicaid HCBS waivers. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 49(1), 127–138. https://doi.org/10.3233/JVR-180959
GouldR.HarrisS. P.CaldwellK.FujiuraG.JonesR.OjokP.EnriquezK. P. (2015). Beyond the law: A review of knowledge, attitudes and perceptions in ADA employment research. Disability Studies Quarterly, 35(3). https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v35i3.4935
21.
HasanS. (2013). Will there be a direct support professional for me? Looking at what motivates DSPs. Humboldt State University.
22.
HewittA.LakinK. C. (2001). Issues in the direct support workforce and their connections to the growth, sustainability and quality of community supports (Vol. 21). University of Minnesota, Research and Training Center on Community Living.
23.
HewittA.LarsonS. (2007). The direct support workforce in community supports to individuals with developmental disabilities: Issues, implications, and promising practices. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 13(2), 178–187. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrdd.20151
24.
HewittA.LarsonS.EdelsteinS.SeaveyD.HogeM.MorrisJ. (2008). A synthesis of direct service workforce demographics and challenges across intellectual/developmental disabilities, aging, physical disabilities, and behavioral health. University of Minnesota, Institute on Community Integration, Research and Training Center on Community Living.
25.
LukyanovaV. V.BalcazarF. E.OberoiA. K.Suarez-BalcazarY. (2014). Employment outcomes among African Americans and Whites with mental illness. Work, 48(3), 319–328.
26.
MadrigalB. (2011). Statement of endorsement by: Barbara Madrigal.
National Disability Rights Network. (2011). Segregated and exploited: The failure of the disability system to provide quality work. Washington, DC: National Disability Rights Network.
30.
Olmstead v. LC, No. 98–536, 527 581 (Supreme Court 1999).
31.
RoganP.RinneS. (2011). National call for organizational change from sheltered to integrated employment. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 49(4), 248–260. https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-49.4.248
32.
SmergutP. (2007). Minimizing turnover among support counselors through a value based culture. Journal of Nonprofit Management, 11(1), 28–39.
33.
State Vocational Rehabilitation Services Program. (2001). 4 C.F.R. §361.5.
34.
TaylorS. J. (2008). The direct support workforce crisis: Can unions help resolve this?Center on Human Policy, Syracuse University.
35.
United Nations. (1948). Universal declaration of human rights (217 [III] A).
WinsorJ.TimmonsJ.ButterworthJ.ShepardJ.LandaC.SmithF.. . . LandimL. (2017). StateData: The national report on employment services and outcomes. Institute for Community Inclusion.
39.
Wolf-BraniginM.Wolf-BraniginK.IsraelN. (2007). Complexities in attracting and retaining direct support professionals. Journal of Social Work in Disability & Rehabilitation, 6(4), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.1300/J198v06n04_02
