Web surveys enable efficient data collection, but their usefulness is potentially limited when studying people with disabilities, who often lack Internet access. We test the feasibility of collecting web survey data from a sample of state vocational rehabilitation (VR) applicants, inviting nonrespondents to complete a telephone interview instead. People who lacked Internet access were provided with a mobile device and wireless access and were as likely to complete the web surveys as people who already had Internet access. Respondents who elected to complete the survey online versus by telephone differed in level of education and VR experience. These findings suggest that for disability studies, web surveys are an important supplement to, but not a replacement for, traditional data collection efforts.
BarakA.SadovskyY. (2008). Internet use and personal empowerment of hearing-impaired adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 1802–1815. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.02.007
2.
BlomA. G.HerzingJ. M.CornesseC.SakshaugJ. W.KriegerU.BossertD. (2017). Does the recruitment of offline households increase the sample representativeness of probability-based online panels? Evidence from the German Internet panel. Social Science Computer Review, 35, 498–520. doi:10.1177/0894439316651584
3.
BruckerD. L.MitraS.ChaitooN.MauroJ. (2015). More likely to be poor whatever the measure: Working-age persons with disabilities in the United States. Social Science Quarterly, 96, 273–296. doi:10.1111/ssqu.12098
4.
ChadwickD.WessonC.FullwoodC. (2013). Internet access by people with intellectual disabilities: Inequalities and opportunities. Future Internet, 5, 376–339. doi:10.3390/fi5030376
5.
ChoiN. G.DiNittoD. M. (2013). The digital divide among low-income homebound older adults: Internet use patterns, eHealth literacy, and attitudes toward computer/Internet use. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15(5), e93. doi:10.2196/jmir.2645
6.
ConverseP. D.WolfeE. W.HuangX.OswaldF. L. (2008). Response rates for mixed-mode surveys using mail and e-mail/web. American Journal of Evaluation, 29, 99–107. doi:10.1177/1098214007313228
7.
CookC.HeathF.ThompsonR. L. (2000). A meta-analysis of response rates in web- or internet-based surveys. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60(6), 821–836. doi:10.1177/00131640021970934
De CesareiA.BaldaroB. (2015). Doing online research involving university students with disabilities: Methodological issues. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 374–380. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.028
10.
de RadaV. D.Domínguez-ÁlvarezJ. A. (2014). Response quality of self-administered questionnaires: A comparison between paper and web questionnaires. Social Science Computer Review, 32, 256–269. doi:10.1177/0894439313508516
11.
DillmanD. A.PhelpsG.TortoraR.SwiftK.KohrellJ.BerckJ.MesserB. L. (2009). Response rate and measurement differences in mixed-mode surveys using mail, telephone, interactive voice response (IVR) and the Internet. Social Science Research, 38, 1–18. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2008.03.007
12.
DillmanD. A.SmythJ. D.ChristianL. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
13.
DobranskyK.HargittaiE. (2006). The disability divide in Internet access and use. Information, Communication & Society, 9, 313–334. doi:10.1080/13691180600751298
14.
EnnisL.RoseD.DenisM.PanditN.WykesT. (2012). Can’t surf, won’t surf: The digital divide in mental health. Journal of Mental Health, 21, 395–403. doi:10.3109/09638237.2012.689437
15.
FoxS. (2011). The social life of health information, 2011. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.
16.
GreenlawC.Brown-WeltyS. (2009). A comparison of web-based and paper-based survey methods testing assumptions of survey mode and response cost. Evaluation Review, 33, 464–480. doi:10.1177/0193841X09340214
17.
GrossJ.FrancisG. (2015). Development and testing of the community employment survey. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 42, 229–234. doi:10.3233/JVR-150743
18.
GrovesR. M. (2006). Nonresponse rates and nonresponse bias in household surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 70, 646–675.
19.
HardinJ. W.HilbeJ. M. (2002). Generalized estimating equations. New York: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
20.
HoutenvilleA. J.BruckerD. L.LauerE. A. (2016). 2015 annual disability statistics compendium. Durham: Institute on Disability, University of New Hampshire.
21.
HwangK. (2005). Attitudes of persons with physical disabilities toward physician-assisted death: An exploratory assessment of the vulnerability argument. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 16, 16–21. doi:10.1177/10442073050160010301
22.
InanF. A.NaminA. S.PogrundR. L.JonesK. S. (2016). Internet use and cybersecurity concerns of individuals with visual impairments. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19, 28–40. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.19.1.28
23.
IsraelG. D. (2012). Combining mail and e-mail contacts to facilitate participation in mixed-mode surveys. Social Science Computer Review, 31, 346–358. doi:10.1177/0894439312464942
24.
JaszczakA.SevakP.WrightD. (2017). Personal characteristics of vocational rehabilitation applicants: Findings from the survey of disability and employment. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 46, 177–185. doi:10.3233/JVR-160853
25.
JohanssonS.GulliksenJ.LantzA. (2015). Cognitive accessibility for mentally disabled persons. In AbascalJ.BarbosaS.FetterM.GrossT.PalanqueP.WincklerM. (Eds.), Human-computer interaction–INTERACT 2015 (pp. 418–443). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-22701-6_31
26.
KaplowitzM. D.HadlockT. D.LevineR. (2004). A comparison of web and mail survey response rates. Public Opinion Quarterly, 68, 94–101.
27.
KellyS. M.SmithT. J. (2008). The digital social interactions of students with visual impairments: Findings from two national surveys. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 102, 528–539.
28.
KreuterF.PresserS.TourangeauR. (2008). Social desirability bias in CATI, IVR, and web surveys the effects of mode and question sensitivity. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72, 847–865. doi:10.1093/poq/nfn063
29.
LanierP.TannerJ.TotaroM.GradnigoG. (2013). Survey research response rates: Internet technology vs. snail mail. Journal of Business, Industry and Economics, 18, 127–142.
30.
LenhartA.HorriganJ.RainieL.AllenK.BoyceA.MaddenM.O’GradyE. (2003). The ever-shifting Internet population: A new look at Internet access and the digital divide. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.
31.
Maiorana-BasasM.PagliaroC. M. (2014). Technology use among adults who are deaf and hard of hearing: A national survey. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 19, 400–410. doi:10.1093/deafed/enu005
32.
MannD. R.HoneycuttT.BaileyM. S.O’NeillJ. (2017). Using administrative data to explore the employment and benefit receipt outcomes of vocational rehabilitation applicants years after program exit. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 46, 159–176. doi:10.3233/JVR-160852
33.
MoonN. W.BakerP. M. (2012). Assessing stakeholder perceptions of workplace accommodations barriers: Results from a policy research instrument. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 23, 94–109. doi:10.1177/1044207311425383
34.
OlsonK.SmythJ. D.WoodH. M. (2012). Does giving people their preferred survey mode actually increase survey participation rates? An experimental examination. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76, 611–635. doi:10.1093/poq/nfs024
RoesslerR. T.GitchelW. D.BishopM. (2013). Housing satisfaction: An additive predictor of QOL for adults with MS?Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 39, 101–109.
37.
ScholzF.YalcinB.PriestleyM. (2017). Internet access for disabled people: Understanding socio-relational factors in Europe. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 11(1), Article, 4. doi:10.5817/CP2017-1-4
38.
ShihT. H.FanX. (2008). Comparing response rates from web and mail surveys: A meta-analysis. Field Methods, 20, 249–271. doi:10.1177/1525822X08317085
39.
ShinE.JohnsonT. P.RaoK. (2012). Survey mode effects on data quality: Comparison of web and mail modes in a U.S. National Panel Survey. Social Science Computer Review, 30, 212–228. doi:10.1177/0894439311404508
40.
SimcoxT.FiezJ. A. (2014). Collecting response times using Amazon Mechanical Turk and Adobe Flash. Behavior Research Methods, 46, 95–111.
41.
ThorénE. S.ÖbergM.WänströmG.AnderssonG.LunnerT. (2013). Internet access and use in adults with hearing loss. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15(5), e91. doi:10.2196/jmir.2221
Van der KooijA. J.MeulmannJ. J. (2004). Categorical regression. In MeulmannJ. J.HeiserW. J., & SPSS Inc. (Eds.), SPPS categories 13.0 (107–158). Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc.
44.
VicenteM. R.LópezA. J. (2010). A multidimensional analysis of the disability digital divide: Some evidence for Internet use. The Information Society, 26, 48–64. doi:10.1080/01615440903423245
45.
WehmeyerM. L.SmithS. J.PalmerS. B.DaviesD. K. (2004). Technology use by students with intellectual disabilities: An overview. Journal of Special Education Technology, 19(4), 7–21. doi:10.1177/016264340401900402
46.
YunG. W.TrumboC. W. (2000). Comparative response to a survey executed by post, e-mail, & web form. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 6(1). doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2000.tb00112.x
47.
ZhangC.ConradF. (2014). Speeding in web surveys: The tendency to answer very fast and its association with straightlining. Survey Research Methods, 8, 127–135.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
