Implementation of Self-Directed Supports for People With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities in the United States

Abstract

Self-direction is an approach to human service delivery within long-term services and supports that aims to provide greater control for individuals with disabilities and their closest supporters. The purpose of this study was to understand the implementation of self-directed supports for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Researchers interviewed state developmental disabilities administrators in 34 of 42 states that currently operate self-directed service options and used qualitative analysis to arrive at a thematic map of the strengths and challenges currently experienced by state administrators. Common strengths identified by state administrators were increased opportunities for participant self-determination and improved relationships with support staff. Common challenges included restructuring case management relationships, as well as rulemaking and enforcement. Administrators’ suggestions for the future of self-direction focused on increasing program size and streamlining services using technology.

Keywords

self-direction consumer direction intellectual and developmental disability HCBS waiver services qualitative research

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abery

Stancliffe

(2003). An ecological theory of self-determination: Theoretical foundations. In Wehmeyer

M. L.

Abery

B. H.

Mithaug

D. E.

Stancliffe’s

R. J.

(Eds.), Theory in self-determination: Foundations for educational practice (pp. 25–42). Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas Publisher.

American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. (2008). Supports Intensity Scale information. Retrieved from https://aaidd.org/docs/default-source/sis-docs/latestsispresentation.pdf?sfvrsn=2

Atlas.ti. (Version) 7.5. [Computer software]. (2014). Berlin, Germany: Scientific Software Development GmbH.

Bogenschutz

Hewitt

Hall-Lande

LaLiberte

(2010). Status and trends in the direct support workforce in self-directed supports. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 48, 345–360. doi:10.1352/1934-9556-48.5.345

Braun

Clarke

(2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Caldwell

(2007). Experiences of families with relatives with intellectual and developmental disabilities in a consumer-directed support program. Disability & Society, 22, 549–562. doi:10.1080/09687590701560139

Caldwell

Heller

(2003). Management of respite and personal assistance services in a consumer-directed family support programme. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 47(4–5), 352–367.

Caldwell

Heller

(2007). Longitudinal outcomes of a consumer-directed program supporting adults with developmental disabilities and their families. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 45, 161–173. doi:10.1352/1934-9556(2007)45[161:LOOACP]2.0.CO;2

Crisp

Doty

Smith

Flanagan

(2010). Developing and implementing self-direction programs and policies: A handbook. Boston, MA: National Resource Center for Participant-Directed Services. Retrieved from http://www.bc.edu/schools/gssw/nrcpds/tools/handbook.html

10.

DeCarlo

Hall-Lande

Bogenschutz

Hewitt

(2017). State of the states in self-direction for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities (Policy Research Brief, Vol. 26, No. 1). Minneapolis: Research and Training Center on Community Living at the University of Minnesota.

11.

Dennis

Blanchard

(2013). Abortion providers’ experiences with Medicaid abortion coverage policies: A qualitative multistate study. Health Services Research, 48, 236–252. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2012.01443.x

12.

Eiken

Sredl

Gold

Kasten

Burwell

Saucier

(2014). Medicaid expenditures for long-term services and supports in FY 2012. Retrieved from https://www.medicaid.gov/medicaid/ltss/downloads/ltss-expenditures-2012.pdf

13.

Gross

J. M.

Wallace

Blue-Banning

Summers

J. A.

Turnbull

(2013). Examining the experiences and decisions of parents/guardians participant directing the supports and services of adults with significant intellectual and developmental disabilities. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 24, 88–101. doi:10.1177/1044207312439102

14.

Hall-Lande

Hewitt

Bogenschutz

LaLiberte

(2012). County administrator perspectives on the implementation of self-directed supports. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 22, 247–256. doi:10.1177/1044207311416595

15.

Heller

Arnold

C. K.

van Heumen

McBride

E. L.

Factor

(2012). Self-directed support: Impact of hiring practices on adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities and families. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 117, 464–477. doi:10.1352/1944-7558-117.6.464

16.

Heller

Caldwell

(2005). Impact of a consumer-directed family support program on reduced out-of-home institutional placement. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 2, 63–65. doi:10.1111/j.1741-1130.2005.00010.x

17.

Infield

D. L.

(2005). States’ experiences implementing consumer-directed home and community services: Results of the 2004 survey of state administrators, opinion survey & telephone interviews. Washington, DC: National Association of State Units on Aging.

18.

Larson

S. A.

Eschenbacher

H. J.

Anderson

L. L.

Taylor

Pettingell

Hewitt

. . . Fay

M. L.

(2017). In-home and residential long-term supports and services for persons with intellectual or developmental disabilities: Status and trends through 2014. Minneapolis: Research and Training Center on Community Living, Institute on Community Integration, University of Minnesota.

19.

Matthias

R. E.

Benjamin

A. E.

(2008). Paying friends, family members, or strangers to be home-based personal assistants: How satisfied are consumers? Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 18, 205–218. doi:10.1177/1044207307311526

20.

Mirza

Hammel

(2009). Consumer-directed goal planning in the delivery of assistive technology services for people who are ageing with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 22, 445–457. doi:10.1111/j.1468-3148.2009.00495.x

21.

Moseley

Gettings

Cooper

(2003). Having it your way: Understanding state individual budgeting strategies. Alexandria, VA: National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services.

22.

Nadash

(1998). Independent choices: Enhancing consumer direction for people with disabilities. Retrieved from https://www.independentliving.org/docs4/ar3983.html

23.

Nadash

Crisp

(2005). Best practices in consumer direction. Washington, DC: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Retrieved from https://aspe.hhs.gov/system/files/pdf/177236/CMS-CDBestPractices.pdf

24.

National Core Indicators. (2011). What does NCI tell us about people who self-direct? (NCI Data Brief No. 1). Retrieved from https://www.nationalcoreindicators.org/upload/core-indicators/Data_Brief_–_self_direction_–_Issue_1–_April_4_2011_1.pdf

25.

Nerney

(2005). Self-determination after a decade. TASH Connections, 31, 3–4.

26.

Stone

Harrington

(2015). Medicaid home and community-based services: How consumer access is restricted by state policies. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 27, 21–46. doi:10.1080/08959420.2015.969078

27.

Prouty

Smith

Lakin

K. C.

(Eds.). (2007). Residential services for persons with developmental disabilities: Status and trends through 2006. Minneapolis: Research and Training Center on Community Living, Institute on Community Integration, University of Minnesota.

28.

Schoeps

(2015). Veteran-directed home and community-based services (VD-HCBS) payment procedures [PowerPoint slides]. Retrieved from http://www.bc.edu/schools/gssw/nrcpds/help/programdev/vd-hcbs.html

29.

Sciegaj

Mahoney

K. J.

Schwartz

A. J.

Simon-Rusinowitz

Selkow

Loughlin

D. M.

(2016). An inventory of publicly funded participant-directed long-term services and supports programs in the United States. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 26, 245–251. doi:10.1177/1044207314555810

30.

Sciegaj

Mahoney

K. J.

Simone

(2008). State experiences with implementing the Cash and Counseling Demonstration and Evaluation Project. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 20, 81–98. doi:10.1300/J031v20n01_05

31.

Severance

D. D.

Campbell

E. M.

(2008). What is a funding formula? In Resource allocation and the Supports Intensity Scale™: Four papers on issues and approaches. Retrieved from https://aaidd.org/docs/default-source/sis-docs/siswpresourceallocation.pdf?sfvrsn=0

32.

Simon-Rusinowitz

Garcia

G. M.

Martin

Sadler

M. D.

Tilly

Marks

L. N.

. . . Mahoney

K. J.

(2009). Hiring relatives as caregivers in two states: Developing an education and research agenda for policy makers. Social Work in Public Health, 25, 17–41. doi:10.1080/19371910802678970

33.

Simon-Rusinowitz

Marks

L. N.

Loughlin

D. M.

Desmond

S. M.

Mahoney

K. J.

Zacharias

B. L.

. . . Allison

A. M.

(2002). Implementation issues for consumer-directed programs: Comparing views of policy experts, consumers, and representatives. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 14, 95–118. doi:10.4324/9780203049723

34.

Smith

Fortune

(2008). The Supports Intensity Scale and resource allocation. In Resource allocation and the Supports Intensity Scale™: Four papers on issues and approaches. Retrieved from https://aaidd.org/docs/default-source/sis-ocs/siswpresourceallocation.pdf?sfvrsn=0

35.

Timberlake

M. T.

Leutz

W. N.

Warfield

M. E.

Chiri

(2014). “In the driver’s seat”: Parent perceptions of choice in a participant-directed Medicaid waiver program for young children with Autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44, 903–914. doi:10.1007/s10803-013-1942-4

36.

Vinton

(2010). Caregivers’ perceptions of a consumer-directed care program for adults with developmental disabilities. Journal of Family Social Work, 13, 208–226. doi:10.1080/10522151003756052

37.

Walker

Hewitt

Bogenschutz

Hall-Lande

(2009). Implementation of consumer-directed services for persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities: A national study (Policy Research Brief, Vol. 20, No. 1). Minneapolis: Research and Training Center on Community Living, Institute on Community Integration, University of Minnesota.

38.

Wehmeyer

Chapman

T. E.

Little

T. D.

Thompson

J. R.

Schalock

Tasse

M. J.

(2009). Efficacy of the Supports Intensity Scale (SIS) to predict extraordinary support needs. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 114, 3–14. doi:10.1352/2009.114:3-14

39.

Wehmeyer

M. L.

(1999). A functional model of self-determination describing development and implementing instruction. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 14, 53–61. doi:10.1177/108835769901400107

40.

Weiss

J. A.

Lunsky

Tassé

M. J.

Durbin

(2009). Support for the construct validity of the Supports Intensity Scale based on clinician rankings of need. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 30, 933–941. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2009.01.007