From Welfare to Work and From Work to Welfare: A Comparison of People With and Without Disabilities

Abstract

In this study, we explore the behavioral factors that play a role in the decision—among people with and without disabilities—to move from welfare to work and from work to welfare. A survey of people with and without disabilities in Israel was conducted; a nonprobability quota sample of 193 individuals was drawn (95 people with disabilities and 98 nondisabled people). The data were collected by means of a closed-ended questionnaire. The results show that people with disabilities tended more than nondisabled persons to favor decisions that maintain their current employment status quo bias). Furthermore, compared with nondisabled individuals, people with disabilities demanded more wages or benefits while changing status in the labor market. The more years of education people with disabilities have, the less incentive is needed to resume or begin working. In addition, the noneconomic value of work is higher among more-educated people compared with less-educated people with disabilities. The results emphasize the need to design various policies to lower the status quo bias effect, especially, among people with disabilities. Maintaining employment status among this population, and promoting their education level, should be central rehabilitation priorities.

Keywords

from welfare to work from work to welfare behavioral biases persons with and without disabilities Israel

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ameri

Schur

Adya

Bentley

McKay

Kruse

(2015). The disability employment puzzle: A field experiment on employer hiring behavior (Working Paper No. 21560). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w21560

Andersson

Luthra

Hurtig

Tideman

(2015). Employer attitudes toward hiring persons with disabilities: A vignette study in Sweden. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 43(1), 41–50.

Axelrad

Luski

Malul

(2016). Behavioral biases in the labor market, differences between older and younger individuals. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 60, 23–28.

Baldwin

(2015). The costs of caring: Families with disabled children. London, England: Routledge.

Barlev-Kotler

Rivkin

, & Myers-JDC-Brookdale Institute, & Sandler-Loeff

(2014). People with disabilities in Israel facts & figures [in Hebrew]. Retrieved from https://brookdale.jdc.org.il/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/book-heb.pdf

Becker

G. S.

(1964). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

Becker

G. S.

(2009). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

Blessing

Golden

T. P.

Bruyère

S. M.

Van Looy

(2012). Vocational rehabilitation, inclusion, and social integration. In Kennedy

(Ed.), The Oxford handbook of rehabilitation psychology (pp. 453–473). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Cai

(2013). Graduate employability: A conceptual framework for understanding employers’ perceptions. Higher Education, 65, 457–469

10.

Commission for Equal Rights of Persons with Disabilities. (2016). Persons with Disabilities in Israel: Statistics [in Hebrew]. Retrieved from http://www.justice.gov.il/Units/NetzivutShivyon/publications/news/Pages/Statistics-People-With-Disabilities-Israel-NOV16.aspx

11.

Corno

de Walque

(2013). Socioeconomic determinants of stigmatization and HIV testing in Lesotho. AIDS Care, 25(Suppl. 1), S108–S113.

12.

Corrigan

P. W.

(2014). The stigma of disease and disability: Understanding causes and overcoming injustices. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

13.

Duvdevany

Or-Chen

Fine

(2016). Employers’ willingness to hire a person with intellectual disability in light of the regulations for adjusted minimum wages. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 44(1), 33–41.

14.

Ferrer-i-Carbonell

Van Praag

B. M.

(2001). Poverty in Russia. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2, 147–172.

15.

Foster

(2011). The Israeli welfare state. Available from http://works.bepress.com/

16.

Gal

(2001). The perils of compensation in social welfare policy: Disability policy in Israel. Social Service Review, 75, 225–244.

17.

Gilbride

Stensrud

Ehlers

Evans

Peterson

(2000). Employers’ attitudes toward hiring persons with disabilities and vocational rehabilitation services. Journal of Rehabilitation, 66(4), 17–23.

18.

Gonen

L. D.

(2016). Satisfaction with in vitro fertilization treatment: Patients’ experiences and professionals’ perceptions. Fertility Research and Practice, 2(1), 6. doi:10.1186/s40738-016-0019-4

19.

Gould

Harris

S. P.

Caldwell

Fujiura

Jones

Ojok

Enriquez

K. P.

(2015). Beyond the law: A review of knowledge, attitudes and perceptions in ADA employment research. Disability Studies Quarterly, 35(3). Retrieved from http://dsq-sds.org/article/view/4935/4095

20.

Harlan

S. L.

Robert

P. M.

(1998). The social construction of disability in organizations why employers resist reasonable accommodation. Work and Occupations, 25, 397–435.

21.

Herek

G. M.

(1999). AIDS and stigma. American Behavioral Scientist, 42, 1106–1116.

22.

Hernandez

Keys

Balcazar

(2000). Employer attitudes toward workers with disabilities and their ADA employment rights: A literature review. Journal of Rehabilitation, 66(4), 4–16.

23.

Kahneman

Knetsch

J. L.

Thaler

R. H.

(1991). Anomalies—The endowment effect, loss aversion, and the status quo bias. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5, 193–206.

24.

Kahneman

Tversky

(1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–291.

25.

Koch Davidovich

. (2010). Integration of people with disabilities at work [in Hebrew]. Retrieved from https://www.knesset.gov.il/mmm/data/pdf/me02640.pdf

26.

Kregel

(2012). Work incentives planning and assistance program: Current program results document the program’s ability to improve employment outcomes, reduce dependence on benefits, and generate cost savings for SSA. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 36(1), 3–12.

27.

Marin

Prinz

(2003). Facts and figures on disability welfare. Vienna, Austria: European Centre for Social Welfare Policy and Research.

28.

Minh

H. V.

Giang

K. B.

Liem

N. T.

Palmer

Thao

N. P.

Duong

L. B.

(2015). Estimating the extra cost of living with disability in Vietnam. Global Public Health, 10(Suppl. 1), S70–S79.

29.

Mont

(2004). Disability employment policy. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.co.il/&httpsredir=1&article=1433&context=gladnetcollect

30.

Mor

(2005). Imagining the law: The construction of disability in the domains of rights and welfare—The case of Israeli disability policy. Retrieved from https://works.bepress.com/sagitmor/5/

31.

National Insurance Institute of Israel. (n.d.a). “Laron Law” for employment integration (Amendment 109 to National Insurance Law, 2009). Retrieved from https://www.btl.gov.il/English%20Homepage/Publications/AnnualSurvey/2012/Documents/Disability.pdf

32.

National Insurance Institute of Israel. (n.d.b). Vocational rehabilitation for disabled persons. Retrieved from https://www.btl.gov.il/English%20Homepage/Benefits/Vocational%20Rehabilitation/disabilities/Pages/default.aspx

33.

Regev-Cabir

(2011). Employers attitudes towards hiring employees with disabilities and the need for a separated image [in Hebrew]. Retrieved http://www.aisrael.org/_Uploads/dbsAttachedFiles/amadot_maasikim.pdf

34.

Rimmerman

Soffer

David

Dagan

Rothler

Mishaly

(2015). Mapping the terrain of disability legislation: The case of Israel. Disability & Society, 30(1), 46–58.

35.

Ruderman Family Foundation. (2014). Bar-Ilan University Empowerment Program. Retrieved from http://www.rudermanfoundation.org/our-approach/awards/ruderman-prize-in-inclusion/2014-ruderman-prize-inclusion/bar-ilan-university-empowerment-pogram

36.

Samuelson

Zeckhauser

(1988). Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1(1), 7–59.

37.

Savage

(1993). An empirical investigation into the effect of psychological perceptions on the willingness-to-pay to reduce risk. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 6, 75–90.

38.

Schultz

T. W.

(1961). Investment in human capital. The American Economic Review, 51(1), 1–17.

39.

Schur

Colella

Adya

(2016). Introduction to special issue on people with disabilities in the workplace. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27, 1471–1476.

40.

Shaw

(2013). Literature review on hiring persons with disabilities. Retrieved from http://deep.idrc.ocadu.ca/lit-review-hiring/

41.

Sherman

(2010). Work motivation and its relationship to welfare caseload (Unpublished doctoral dissertation) [in Hebrew]. Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beersheba, Israel.

42.

Sherman

Shavit

(2009). Welfare to work and work to welfare: The effect of the reference point—A theoretical and experimental study. Economic Letters, 105, 290–292.

43.

Soffer

Chew

(2015). Framing disability among young adults with disabilities and non-disabled young adults: An exploratory study. Disability and Rehabilitation, 37, 171–178.

44.

Stapleton

D. C.

O’day

B. L.

Livermore

G. A.

Imparato

A. J.

(2006). Dismantling the poverty trap: Disability policy for the twenty-first century. The Milbank Quarterly, 84, 701–732.

45.

Tversky

Kahneman

(1991). Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1, 1039–1061.

46.

Ville

Winance

(2006). To work or not to work? The occupational trajectories of wheelchair users. Disability and Rehabilitation, 28, 423–436.

47.

Vornholt

Uitdewilligen

Nijhuis

F. J.

(2013). Factors affecting the acceptance of people with disabilities at work: A literature review. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 23, 463–475.

48.

World Health Organization. (2011). International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Retrieved from http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/en/

49.

World Health Organization & The World Bank. (2011). World report on disability. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/disabilities/world_report/2011/report.pdf