The overarching goal of the Ley Nacional de Discapacidad (LND; National Disability Law [NDL]) enacted by Chile in 2010 is to facilitate “positive effects on Quality of Life (QOL) for individuals with disabilities” through the promotion of personal relationships, personal development, social inclusion, rights, and self-determination. Of the components linked to QOL in the 2010 law, self-determination may impose the most complex challenge to implement in Chilean society. Self-determination can be viewed as a social value, an individual skill set, or a personal outcome. Self-determination is discussed in relation to Chile’s collectivistic society, its history of disability rights, and to Person-Centered Planning, an approach that may enable Chile to fulfill the mandate of its NDL while balancing collectivistic and individualistic values.
AlgozzineB.BrowderD.KarvonenM.TestD. W.WoodW. M. (2001). Effects of interventions to promote self-determination for individuals with disabilities. Review of Educational Research, 7, 219–277. doi:10.3102/00346543071002219
2.
ArmstrongF.MooreM.RussellO.SchimanskiE. (2009). Action research for creating inclusive education. In AlurM.TimmonsV. (Eds.), Inclusive education across cultures: Crossing boundaries, sharing ideas (pp. 188–209). New Delhi, India: SAGE.
3.
BarreraP.FritzM. (2009). Integración laboral de personas con discapacidad física pertenecientes a agrupaciones de la red provincial de y para la discapacidad de Concepción que se encontraban trabajando durante el año 2008 [Analysis of the inclusion process of persons with physical disabilities who were working in 2008 in the province of Concepción] (Undergraduate thesis, Universidad de Concepción, Chile). Available from http://www.fnd.cl
4.
BellB.Jr.HenthorneR. S.Adams HillD.Turnbull-HumphriesJ. W.ZitoS. T. (2009). Autonomy and disability: A quest for quality of life. In MarshallC. A.KendallE.BanksM. E.GoverR. M. S. (Eds.), Disabilities: Insights from across fields and around the world (Vol. 2, pp. 17–38). Westport, CT: Praeger.
5.
BlackorbyJ.WagnerM. (1996). Longitudinal post-school outcomes of youth with disabilities: Findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study. Exceptional Children, 62, 399–413.
6.
Blue-BanningM. J.TurnbullA. P.PereiraL. (2000). Group action planning as a support strategy for Hispanic families: Parent and professional perspectives. Mental Retardation, 38, 262–275. Retrieved from http://aaiddjournals.org/loi/mere.1
7.
BrowderD. M.WoodW. M.TestD. W.KarvonenM.AlgozzineB. (2001). Reviewing resources on self-determination: A map for teachers. Remedial and Special Education, 22, 233–244. doi:10.1177/074193250102200407
8.
BuiY. N.TurnbullA. (2003). East meets West: Analysis of person-centered planning in the context of Asian American values. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 38, 18–31.
9.
CofréE.SalaméA. M. (2000, October). Trabajo social, municipio y discapacidad: La experiencia de una oficina comunal [Social Work, municipality and disability: The experience of a communal office]. Paper presented at Primer Encuentro LatinoAmericano de Trabajo Social Comunitario, Santiago de Chile. Retrieved from http://www.ts.ucr.ac.cr/eventos/eltsc-01-po.htm
10.
CooperC. R.DennerJ. (1998). Theories linking culture and psychology: Universal and community-specific processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 559–584. Retrieved from http://www.annualreviews.org/journal/psych
11.
Donoso-MalufF. (2006). Chile: New bottle, old wine. In GeorgasJ.BerryJ. W.vanF. J. R.VijverdeKağıtÇıbaşıÇ.PoortingaY. H. (Eds.), Families across cultures (pp. 293–302). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
FieldS.HoffmanA. (2002). Preparing youth to exercise self-determination: Quality indicators of school environments that promote the acquisition of knowledge, skills, and beliefs related to self-determination. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 13, 113–123. Available from http://dps.sagepub.com/
14.
FieldS.MartinJ.MillerR.WardM.WehmeyerM. L. (1998). A practical guide to teaching self-determination. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED442207.pdf
15.
FlanneryK. B.NewtonS.HornerR. H.SlovicR.BlumbergR.ArdW. R. (2000). The impact of person-centered planning on the content and organization of individual supports. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 23, 123–137. Available from http://dps.sagepub.com/
16.
Fondo Nacional de la Discapacidad (FONADIS) de Chile [National Disability Fund of Chile]. (2006). Discapacidad en Chile [Disability in Chile] (NIH Publication No. 152932). Available from http://www.senadis.gob.cl/
17.
FranklandH. C.TurnbullA. P.WehmeyerM. L.BlackmountainL. (2004). An exploration of the self-determination construct and disability as it relates to the Diné (Navajo) culture. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 39, 191–205.
18.
GroarkC. J.McCallR. B. (2005). Integrating developmental scholarship into practice and policy. In BornsteinM. H.LambM. E. (Eds.), Developmental psychology: An advanced textbook (5th ed., pp. 570–601). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
HofstedeG.HofstedeG. J.MinkovM. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
21.
HolburnS.JacobsonJ. W.SchwartzA. A.FloryM. J.VietzeP. M. (2004). The Willowbrook futures project: A longitudinal analysis of person-centered planning. American Journal of Mental Retardation, 109, 63–76. Available from http://aaiddjournals.org/loi/ajmr.1
22.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) Amendments of 1997, 20 U.S.C.A. 1414 et seq. (1997).
23.
Instituto de Normalización Previsional (INP) de Chile [Institute of Social Security of Chile]. (2006). La empatía hace la diferencia: Guía para la atención de público con discapacidad y adulto mayor [Empathy makes a difference: A guide for personnel working with elderly persons and persons with disabilities] (NIH Publication No. 139421). Available from http://www.mideplan.cl/cgi-bin/btca/WXIS?IsisScript=./xis/plus.xis&mfn=008261&base=Biblo/
24.
Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas (INE) de Chile [National Institute of Statistics (INS) of Chile]. (2012). Resultados preliminares censo población y vivienda 2012 [Preliminary results of the 2012 census]. Available from http://www.ine.cl
25.
Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas y Fondo Nacional de la Discapacidad (INE y FONADIS) de Chile [National Institute of Statistics & National Disability Fund of Chile]. (2004). Primer estudio nacional sobre la discapacidad [First national study on disability] (NIH Publication No. 141.779). Available from http://www.ine.cl
26.
KalyanpurM.HarryB. (2004). Culture in special education: Building reciprocal family-professional relationships. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
27.
KarrV. L. (2011). A life of quality: Informing the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons With Disabilities (UNCRPD). Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 22, 67–82. doi:10.1177/1044207310392785
28.
KimK.TurnbullA. (2004). Transition to adulthood for students with severe intellectual disabilities: Shifting toward person-family interdependent planning. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 29, 53–57. Retrieved from http://tash.org/about/publications/
29.
KohlerP. D.FieldS. (2003). Transition-focused education: Foundation for the future. The Journal of Special Education, 37, 174–183. Available from http://sed.sagepub.com/
30.
Ley de Discapacidad (LD) [Disability Law (DL)], Establece Normas para la Plena Integración Social de Personas con Discapacidad [Determination of Norms for the Full Social Integration for Persons With Disabilities] of 1994, P.C.N.C. Pub. L. No. 19.284 (1994). Available from http://www.bcn.cl/
31.
Ley de Discapacidad (LD) [Disability Law (DL)], Establece Normas sobre Deficientes Mentales [Determination of Norms for Individuals With Intellectual Disability] of 1987, P.C.N.C. Pub. L. No. 18.600 (1987). Available from http://www.bcn.cl/
32.
Ley Nacional de Discapacidad (LND) [National Disability Law (NDL)], Establece Normas sobre Igualdad de Oportunidades e Inclusión Social de Personas con Discapacidad [Determination of Rules on Equal Opportunities and Social Inclusion of Persons With Disabilities] of 2010, P.C.N.C. Pub. L. No. 20.422, § 4, § 61 (2010). Available from http://www.bcn.cl
MarkusH. R.KitayamaS. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/rev/index.aspx
35.
MartinJ. E.MarshallL. H.SaleP. (2004). A three-year study of middle, junior high, and high school IEP meetings. Exceptional Children, 70, 285–297.
36.
MartinJ. E.Williams-DiehmK. (2013). Student engagement and leadership of the transition planning process. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 36, 43–50. doi:10.1177/2165143413476545
37.
McDougallJ.EvansJ.BaldwinP. (2010). The importance of self-determination to perceived quality of life for youth and young adults with chronic conditions and disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 31, 252–260. doi:10.1177/0741932509355989
38.
MenchettiB. M.GarciaL. A. (2003). Personal and employment outcomes of person-centered career planning. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 38, 45–156.
39.
MichaelsC. A.FerraraD. L. (2006). Promoting post-school success for all: The role of collaboration in person-centered transition planning. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 16, 287–313. doi:10.1207/s1532768Xjepc1604_4
40.
MinerC. A.BatesP. E. (1997). The effect of person-centered planning activities on the IEP/transition planning process. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 32, 105–112. Available from http://www.ncddr.org/
41.
MithaugD. E. (1998). Your right, my obligation?Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 23, 41–43. Retrieved from http://tash.org/about/publications/
42.
NotaL.FerrariL.SoresiS.WehmeyerM. L. (2007). Self-determination, social abilities, and the quality of life of people with intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 51, 850–865. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2788.2006.00939.x
43.
Organization of American States. (1999). The inter-American convention on the elimination of all forms of discrimination against persons with disabilities. Retrieved from http://www.oas.org/juridico/english/sigs/a-65.html
44.
OysermanD.CoonH. M.KemmelmeierM. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 3–72. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.128.1.3
45.
Presidente Piñera se mantiene como el cuarto hombre más rico de Chile [President Piñera remains as the fourth richest man in Chile]. (2012, March7). El Mercurio. Available from http://www.emol.com
46.
RasheedS. A.ForeC.IIIMillerS. (2006). Person-centered planning: Practices, promises, and provisos. The Journal for Vocational Special Needs Education, 38, 47–59. Retrieved from http://www.cew.wisc.edu/jvsne/
47.
Real Academia Española [Spanish Royal Academy]. (n.d.). Diccionario de la Real Lengua Española [Dictionary of the Royal Spanish Language]. Retrieved from http://rae.es/
48.
RobertsonJ.EmersonE.HattonC.ElliotJ.McIntoshB.SwiftP.. . .JoyceT. (2006a). Longitudinal analysis of the impact and cost of person-centered planning for people with intellectual disabilities in England. American Journal of Mental Retardation, 111, 400–416. Retrieved from http://aaiddjournals.org/loi/ajmr.1
49.
RobertsonJ.EmersonE.HattonC.ElliotJ.McIntoshB.SwiftP.. . .JoyceT. (2006b). Person-centred planning: Factors associated with successful outcomes for people with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 51, 232–243. Retrieved from http://ca.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-JIR.html
Servicio Nacional de la Discapacidad de Chile (SENADIS) [National Disability Service of Chile]. (2010). Seguimiento y medición de compromisos de Estado en políticas públicas de discapacidad: Modelo conceptual y metodológico [Monitoring and measurement of State commitments in disability policy: A conceptual and methodological model]. Available from http://www.riicotec.org/
52.
TestD. W.NealeM. (2004). Using the self-advocacy strategy to increase middle graders’ IEP participation. Journal of Behavioral Education, 13, 135–145. doi:10.1023/B:JOBE.0000023660.21195.c2
53.
ThomasG. (2011). Contesting legitimacy in Chile: Familial ideals, citizenship, and political struggle, 1970-1990. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
54.
TovW.DienerE. (2010). Culture and subjective well-being. In DienerE.GlatzerW.MoumT.SprangersM. A. G.VogelJ.VeenhovenR. (Eds.), Culture and well-being: The collected works of Ed Diener (pp. 9–41). New York, NY: Springer.
55.
TrainorA. (2002). Self-determination for students with learning disabilities: Is it a universal value?Qualitative Studies in Education, 15, 711–715. doi:10.1080/0951839022000014394
56.
TrainorA. (2005). Self-determination perceptions and behaviors of diverse students with LD during the transition planning process. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 233–249. doi:10.1177/00222194050380030501
57.
TrainorA. (2007). Person-centered planning in two culturally distinct communities: Responding to divergent needs and preferences. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 30, 92–103. doi:10.1177/08857288070300020601
58.
TriandisH. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
59.
TrumbullE.Rothstein-FischC.GreenfieldP. M.QuirozB. (2001). Bridging cultures between home and school: A guide for teachers. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
WardM. J.KohlerP. D. (1996). Promoting self-determination for individuals with disabilities: Content and process. In PowersL. E.SingerG. H. S.SowersJ. (Eds.), Making our way: Building self-competence among children with disabilities (pp. 275–290). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
65.
WehmeyerM. L. (1996). Self-determination as an educational outcome, why is it important to children, youth and adults with disabilities? In SandsD.WehmeyerM. (Eds.), Self-determination across the life span (pp. 17–36). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
66.
WehmeyerM. L. (2004, April). No content left behind: Self-determination in the era of standard-based reform. Paper presented at the National Center on Secondary Education and Transition Capacity Building Institute on Self-determination, New Orleans, LA.
67.
WehmeyerM. L. (2007). Promoting self-determination in students with developmental disabilities. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
68.
WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B. (2003). Adult outcomes for students with cognitive disabilities three-years after high school: The impact of self-determination. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 38, 131–144.
69.
WehmeyerM. L.SchwartzM. (1998). The relationship between self-determination and quality of life for adults with mental retardation. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 33, 3–12.
70.
WeirC. (2004). Person-centered and collaborative supports for college success. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 39, 67–73.
71.
Whitney-ThomasJ.ShawD. M.HoneyK.ButterworthJ. (1998). Building a future: A study of student participation in person-centered planning. The Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 32, 119–133. Retrieved from http://tash.org/about/publications/
72.
WinterJ. A. (2003). The development of the disability rights movement as a social problem solver. Disability Studies Quarterly, 23, 33–61. Available from www.dsq-sds.org/
ZhangD. (2005). Parent practices in facilitating self-determination skills: The influences of culture, socioeconomic status, and children’s special education status. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 30, 154–162. Retrieved from http://tash.org/about/publications/
75.
ZhangD.BenzM. R. (2006). Enhancing self-determination of culturally diverse students with disabilities: Current status and future directions. Focus on Exceptional Children, 38, 1–12. Available from http://search.ebscohost.com/
76.
ZhangD.KatsiyannisA.SingletonS. H.Williams-DiehmK.ChildesK. (2006). Self-determination: How students learn to live. Principal Leadership, 6, 28–34. Retrieved from http://www.nassp.org/tabid/2043/default.aspx
77.
ZhangD.LandmarkL.GrenwelgeC.MontoyaL. (2010). Culturally diverse parents’ perspectives on self-determination. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 45, 175–186.
78.
ZhangD.WehmeyerM.ChenL. L. (2005). Parent and teacher engagement in fostering the self-determination of students with disabilities: A comparison between the United States and the Republic of China. Remedial and Special Education, 26, 55–64. doi:10.1177/07419325050260010701
