An ongoing challenge in serving students with emotional or behavioral disorders (E/BD) is the practice that may allow schools to exclude students from special education programs and services based on certain behavioral patterns. This review (a) examines the application of the exclusionary clause in recent judicial rulings and (b) provides practice implications in serving youth with E/BD.
A. W. v. Fairfax County School Board, 41 IDELR 119 (U.S Ct. of Appeals, 2004).
2.
BowerE. M. (1982). Defining emotional disturbances: Public policy and research. Psychology in the Schools, 19, 55–60.
3.
BradleyR.DoolittleJ.BartolottaR. (2008). Building on the data and adding to the discussion: The experiences and outcomes of students with emotional disturbance. Journal of Behavioral Education, 17, 4–23.
4.
Brendan K. v. Easton Area School District, 47 IDELR 249 (E.D. Pa. 2007).
5.
C. B. v. Department of Education of the City of New York, 52 IDELR 121 (2nd Cir. 1984).
6.
CostelloE.EggerH.AngoldA. (2005). 10-year research update review: The epidemiology of child and adolescent psychiatric disorders: Methods and public health burden. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 44, 972–986. doi:10.1097/01.chi.0000172552.41596.6f
7.
CostenbaderV.BuntaineR. (1999). Diagnostic discrimination between social maladjustment and emotional disturbance: An empirical study. The Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 7, 2–10.
8.
Council for Children with Behavioral Disorders. (1989). A new proposed definition and terminology to replace “serious emotional disturbance” in Education of the Handicapped Act. Reston VA: Author.
9.
Council for Children With Behavioral Disorders. (1990). Position paper on the exclusion of children with conduct and behavioral disorders. Reston VA: Author.
10.
EpsteinM. H.SharmaJ. M. (1998). The Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale: A strength-based approach to assessment. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
11.
Eschenasy v. N.Y. City Dept. of Ed, 52 IDELR 66 (U.S. Dist. Ct. Southern District of N.Y., 2009).
12.
FinnC. E.RotherhamA. J.HokansonC. R. (Eds.). (2001). Rethinking special education for a new century. New York, NY: Thomas B. Fordham Foundation and the Progressive Policy Institute.
13.
FornessS. (1992). Broadening the cultural-organizational perspective in exclusion of youth with social maladjustment: First invited reaction to the Maag and Howell paper. Remedial and Special Education, 13, 55-59.
14.
FornessS. R.FreemanS. F. N.PaparellaT.KauffmanJ. M.WalkerH. M. (2011). Special education implications of point and cumulative prevalence for children with emotional or behavioral disorders. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 19(3), 4–18.
15.
FornessS. R.KavaleK. A. (2000). Emotional or behavioral disorders: Background and current status of the E/BD terminology and definition. Behavioral Disorders, 25, 264–269.
16.
FornessS. R.KnitzerJ. (1992). A new proposed definition and terminology to replace “serious emotional disturbance” in Individuals With Disabilities Education Act. School Psychology Review, 21, 12–20.
17.
Fort Osage R-1 School District. (2010). Missouri State Education Agency (110 LRP 57773).
18.
GreshamF. M. (2005). Response to intervention (RTI): An alternative means of identifying students as emotionally disturbed. Education and Treatment for Children, 28, 328–344.
19.
Hansen v. Republic R-III School District, 56 IDELR 2 (8th Cir. 2011).
20.
HornW.TynanD. (2001). Time to make special education “special” again. In FinnC.RotherhanA. J.HokansonC. (Eds.), Rethinking special education for a new century (pp. 23–52). New York, NY: Thomas B. Fordham Foundation and the Progressive Policy Institute.
21.
HornerR. H.SugaiG. (2000). School-wide behavior support: An emerging initiative. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 2, 231–232.
22.
In re: Student With a Disability. (2012). New Mexico State Educational Agency (112 LRP 5256).
23.
KauffmanJ. M.LandrumT. J. (2013). Characteristics of emotional and behavioral disorders of children and youth (10th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice-Hall.
24.
KendellR. E. (2002). The distinction between personality disorder and mental illness. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 180, 110–115.
25.
LaneK. L.GreshamF.ShaughnessyY. (2002). Serving student with or at-risk for emotional and behavioral disorders: Future challenges. Education and Treatment of Children, 25, 507–521.
26.
Letter to Clarke, 48 IDELR 77 (OSEP 2007).
27.
Lincoln County v. A. A., 39 IDELR 185 (Dist. Ct., Oregon, 2003)
28.
MaagJ. W.HowellK. W. (1992). Special education and the exclusion of youth with social maladjustments: A cultural organizational perspective. Remedial and Special Education, 13(1), 47–54.
29.
MaagW. J.KatsiyannisA. (2008). The medical model to limit eligibility for students with E/BD: A response to intervention alternative. Behavioral Disorders, 33, 184–194.
30.
MerrellK. W.WalkerH. M. (2004). Deconstructing a definition: Social maladjustment versus emotional disturbance and moving the EBD field forward. Psychology in the Schools, 41, 899–910.
31.
MooneyP.RyanJ. B.DennyR. K.GunterP. L. (2012). Behavior modification/traditional techniques for students with EBD. In BakkenJ. P.ObiakorF. E.RotatoriA. F. (Eds.), Advances in special education: Behavioral disorders: Current perspectives and issues: Identification, assessment, and instruction of students with EBD (Vol. 22). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
32.
Mr. I. v. Maine School Administrative District No. 55, 47 IDELR 121 (1st Cir. 2007).
33.
Mr. and Mrs. N. C. v. Bedford Central School Dist. 47 IDELR 95 (U.S. Dist. Ct., Southern Dist. Of N.Y., 2007)
34.
Mr. and Mrs. N. C. v. Bedford Central School Dist. 51 IDELR 149 (2nd Cir., 2008)
35.
NelsonC.RutherfordR. B.CenterD. B.WalkerH. M. (1991). Do public schools have an obligation to serve troubled children and youth?Exceptional Children, 57, 406–415.
36.
PARC v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 334 F. Supp. 1257, 343 F. Supp. 279 (E.D.Pa. 1972).
37.
PeckA.AlbrechtS.GeorgeC.MathurS.PadgetM.RyanJ. B.. . . BakerD. (2012). New direction for CCBD? Three studies examining the future of the organization. Behavioral Disorders, 37, 30–41.
38.
Plainville Board of Education v. R. N., 112 LRP 16721 (U.S. District Ct., Connecticut, 2012).
39.
R. C. and E. P. v. York School Dept. 51 IDELR 68 (U.S. Dist., Maine, 2008).
40.
SanfordC.NewmanL.WagnerM.CametoR.KnokeyA. M.ShaverD. (2011). The post-high school outcomes of young adults with disabilities up to 6 years after high school: Key findings from the national longitudinal transition study-2 (NLTS2) (NCSER 2011-3004). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
41.
ScheuermannB.JohnsB. (2002). Advocacy for students with emotional or behavioral disorders in the 21st century. Behavioral Disorders, 28, 57–69.
42.
SmithC. R.KatsiyannisA.RyanJ. B. (2011). Challenges of serving students with emotional and behavioral disorders: Legal and policy considerations. Behavioral Disorders, 36, 185–194.
43.
St. Joseph-Ogden Community High School Dist. v. Janet W., 49 IDELR 125 (U.S. Dist. Ct, Central Dist. Of Ill., 2008).
44.
Student v. San Mateo Union H. S. Dist., 109 LRP 44926, (U.S. Dist. Ct., N. Dist. of CA, 2008).
45.
Torrance Unified School Dist. v. E. M., 51 IDELR 11 (U.S. Dist. Ct., Central Dist. of CA, 2008).
46.
Upper Merion School District. (2010). Pennsylvania State Educational Agency (110 LRP 40308).
47.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2001). Report of the surgeon general’s conference on children’s mental health: A national action agenda. Washington, DC: Author.
48.
Venus Indep. School Dist. v. Daniel S., 36 IDELR 185 (U.S. Dist. Ct. N. Dist. of TX, 2002)
49.
WagnerM.KutashK.DuchnowskiA. J.EpsteinM. H.SumiW. W. (2005). The children and youth we serve: A national picture of the characteristics of students with emotional disturbances receiving special education. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 13, 79–96.
50.
Waynesboro Area School District. (2010). Pennsylvania State Educational Agency (110 LRP 68609).
51.
W. G. and M. G. v. New York City Department of Education, 56 IDELR 260 (S.D.N.Y 2011).
52.
ZhangD.KatsiyannisA.HerbstM. (2004). Disciplinary exclusions in special education: A 4-year analysis. Behavioral Disorders, 29, 337–347.