The study examined the relationship between work disability and mortgage default in the latest economic downturn in the United States and further assessed the associations of work disability and mortgage default with life satisfaction. Work disability was measured by self-reported health-related work limitations. Mortgage default was defined as delaying home mortgage payment for more than 30 days in the study. The data were obtained from the 2007 and 2009 Panel Study of Income Dynamics, and logistic regression was used to test research questions. Of the 2,361 homeowners who had a mortgage, nearly 6% had mortgage default in 2009, and 14.5% of householders or their spouses had work disabilities in 2007. The disability group was significantly more likely than the non-disability group to have mortgage default, AOR = 1.80, 95% CI = (1.02, 3.16). Both work disability and mortgage default had significant and negative associations with life satisfaction. Results suggest that mortgage assistance services should be provided for individuals with work disabilities and their families to prevent housing distress and improve quality of life.
AcsG.LoprestR. (1999). The effect of disabilities on exits from AFDC. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management,18(1), 28-49.
2.
BajariP.ChuC.ParkM. (2008). An empirical model of subprime mortgage default from 2000 to 2007. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 14625. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
3.
BennettG. G.Scharoun-LeeM.Tucker-SeeleyR. T. (2009). Will the public’s health fall victim to the home foreclosure epidemic?PLoS Medicine, 6(6):e1000087.
4.
BrandonP. D.HofferthS. L.HoganD. P. (2008). Do disabilities in former TANF families hasten their returns to cash assistance?Social Science Research, 37,530-543.
BurkhauserR.V.DalyM. C.HoutenvilleA. J.NargisN. (2002). Self-reported work-limitation data: What they can and cannot tell us. Demography, 39(3), 541-555.
7.
BurkhauserR.V.DuncanG. (1989) Economic risks of gender roles: Income loss and life events over the life course. Social Science Quarterly,70(1), 3-23.
8.
CalhounC. A.DengY. (2002). A dynamic analysis of fixed- and adjustable-rate mortgage terminations. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 24(1/2), 9-33.
9.
CongerR. D.CongerK. J. (2008) Understanding the processes through which economic hardship influences families and children. In CraneD. R.HeatonT. B. (Eds.), Handbook of Families and Poverty (pp.64-81). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
10.
DeLeireT. (2000). The wage and employment effects of the American with Disability Act. Journal of Human Resources, 35(4), 693-715.
11.
EttnerS. L. (1995). The impact of “parent care” on female labor supply decisions. Demography, 32(1), 63-80.
GerardiK.ShapiroA.WillenP. (2007). Subprime outcomes: Risky mortgages, homeownership experiences, and fourclosures. Federal Reserve Bank of Boston Working Paper 07-15. Boston, MA: Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
14.
HillM. (1991). The Panel Study of Income Dynamics: A user’s guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
HuangJ.GuoB.KimY. (2010). Food insecurity and disability: Do economic resources matter?Social Science Research, 39(1), 111-124.
KingG.ZengL. (2001). Logistic regression in rare events data. Political Analysis, 9(2), 137-163.
18.
LevyH.DeleireT. (2003). What do people buy when they don’t buy health insurance and what does that say about why they are uninsured? (NBER working paper 9826) Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
19.
McKernanS.-M.RatcliffeC. (2005). Events that trigger poverty entries and exits. Social Science Quarterly, 86(supplement), 1146-1169.
20.
McKernanS.-M.RatcliffeC.VinopalK. (2009). Do assets help families cope with adverse events?Washington DC: Urban Institute.
21.
MooreK. (2001). Raising the social security retirement ages: Weighting the costs and benefits. Arizona State Law Journal, 33, 544-612.
Mortgage Bankers Association. (2009a). Delinquencies and foreclosures continue to climb in latest MBA National Delinquency Survey. Retrieved March 17, 2010, from http://www.mbaa.org/NewsandMedia/PressCenter/69031.htm.
MuthénL.MuthénB. O. (2007). Mplus: Statistical analysis with latent variables user’s guide. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.
26.
MuthénL.K.MuthénB.O. (2010). Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.
27.
PollackC. E.LynchJ. (2009). Health status of people undergoing foreclosure in the Philadelphia region. American Journal of Public Health, 99(10), 1833-1839.
28.
PutnamM.SherradenM.EdwardsK.PorterfieldS.WittenbergeD.WelchP. (2005). Building financial bridges to economic development and community integration: Recommendations for a research agenda on asset development for people with disabilities. Journal of Social Work and Disability Rehabilitation, 4(3), 61-86.
29.
QuerciaR.StegmanM. (1992). Residential mortgage default: A review of the literature. Journal of Housing Research, 3(2), 341-379.
30.
RobertsonC. T.EgelhofR.HokeM. (2008). Get sick, get out: The medical causes of home mortgage foreclosures. Health Matrix, 18, 65-105.
31.
SheP.LivermoreG. (2006). Material hardship, poverty, and disability among working-age adults. Social Science Quarterly, 88(4), 970-989.
32.
SherradenM. (1991). Assets and the poor: A new American welfare policy. New York: M.E. Sharpe, Inc.
