Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

There has been swift growth in the number of children and youth identified with autism and autism spectrum disorders (ASD) and who receive services through U.S. early intervention and special education systems. This growth, coupled with the intensive and unique needs of this population, has prompted many state agencies to implement policies and practices to improve delivery of services to children with ASD. The results of a national survey of Part C and Part B agencies under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act show that most Part B and many Part C agencies are engaged in initiatives specific to ASD. Professional development, technical assistance, and direct services to children with ASD are the most common approaches used. Case studies of five states’ efforts detail the nature of the ASD initiatives and the use of specific approaches within their state settings.

Keywords

autism ASD policy state education agency technical assistance professional development

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Brantlinger, E. , Jimenez, R. , Klingner, J. , Pugash, M. & Richard-son, V. ( 2005). Qualitative studies in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 195-207.

Brinkerhoff, R.O. ( 2003). The success case method. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.

Emam, M.M. , & Farrell, P. ( 2009). Tensions experienced by teachers and their views of support for pupils with Autism Spectrum Disorders in mainstream schools. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 24, 407-422.

Hanft, B. ( 2001). State technical assistance initiatives for IDEA Part B programs. Project Forum report. Alexandria, VA: National Association of State Directors of Special Education.

Kahn, L. , Hurth, J. , Diefendorf, M. , Kasprzak, C. , Lucas, A. , & Ringwalt, S. ( 2009). NECTAC technical assistance model for long-term systems change. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina, FPG Child Development Institute, National Early Childhood Technical Assistance Center.

Merriam, S.B. ( 2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation . Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Müller, E. ( 2006). State approaches to serving students with Autism Spectrum Disorders. Project Forum Brief Policy Analysis report. Alexandria, VA: National Association of State Directors of Special Education.

Ouellette-Kuntz, H. , Coo, H. , & Yu, C.T. ( 2006). Prevalence of pervasive developmental disorders in two Canadian provinces. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 3, 164-172.

Shaw, E. , & Hatton, D. (Eds.). (2009). Screening and early identification of Autism Spectrum Disorders (Queries: An Occasional Paper Compiling States’ Approaches to Current Topics). Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina, FPG Child Development Institute, National Early Childhood Technical Assistance Center.

10.

Simpson, R. ( 2008). Children and youth with Autism Spectrum Disorders: The search for effective methods. Focus on Exceptional Children , 40(7), 1-14.

11.

U.S. Department of Education. (2009). Parts B and C data reported by states to the Office of Special Education Programs . Retrieved from https://www.ideadata.org/IDEAData.asp

Policies and Practices Used by States to Serve Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References