Quality of life is a multidimensional construct requiring self-determination and advocacy skills, employment, and recognition of basic human rights and fundamental freedoms for improvements to be made. In this study, the constructs of quality of life and self-determination were applied to the rights-based framework guaranteed by the recent United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons With Disabilities (UNCRPD) to inform monitoring and implementation efforts. Persons with disabilities interested in advocacy from Nepal, Zambia, and the United States were surveyed. Significant country differences were found in ratings of quality of life, self-determination, and personal human rights, but similar low ratings in country support of human rights were found. Through the coordinated improvement of significant factors, this study supports quality of life as a useful measure for informing UNCRPD. Future research should focus on the applicability of quality of life to monitoring UNCRPD and policy and program development.
Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. (1990).
2.
Associated Press. (2006, December 13). U.N. General Assembly approves the first convention protecting the rights of the world’s 600 million disabled people. International Herald Tribune. Retrieved January 29, 2007, from http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2006/12/13/news/UN_GEN_UN_Disabled_Rights.php
3.
Balcazar, F.E., Keys, C.B., Bertram, J.F., & Rizzo, T. ( 1996). Advocate development in the field of developmental disabilities: A data-based conceptual model. Mental Retardation, 34(6), 341-351.
4.
Balcazar, F.E., Seekins, T., Fawcett, S.B., & Hopkins, B.L. ( 1990). Empowering people with physical disabilities through advocacy skills training. American Journal of Community Psychology , 18(2), 281-296.
5.
Caballo, C., Crespo, M., Jenaro, C., Verdugo, M.A., & Martinez, J.L. (2005). Factor structure of the Schalock and Keith Quality of Life Questionnaire (QOL-Q): Validation on Mexican and Spanish samples. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research , 49(10), 773-776.
6.
Central Intelligence Agency. (2008a). Nepal. In The World Factbook. Retrieved October 12, 2008, from https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/np.html
7.
Central Intelligence Agency. (2008b). United States. In The World Factbook. Retrieved October 12, 2008, from https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/us.html
8.
Central Intelligence Agency. (2008c). Zambia. In The World Factbook. Retrieved October 12, 2008, from https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/za.html
9.
Chou, Y.C., Schalock, R.L., Tzou, P.Y., Lin, L.C., Chang, A.L., Lee, W.P., & Chang, S.C. ( 2007). Quality of life of adults with intellectual disabilities who live with families in Taiwan. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 51(11), 875-883.
10.
Cunconan-Lahr, R., & Brotherson, M.J. (1996). Advocacy in disability policy: Parents and consumers as advocates. Mental Retardation , 34, 352-358.
11.
Gautam, K. ( 2007). Discrimination against disability in Nepal. Paper presented at the Disabled Peoples’ International World Assembly, Seoul, South Korea.
12.
Hays, P.A. ( 1996). Addressing the complexities of culture and gender in counseling. Journal of Counseling and Development, 74(4), 332-338.
13.
Hofstede, G. ( 1991). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. London: McGraw-Hill.
14.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (1990).
15.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (1997).
16.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (2004).
17.
Jenaro, C., Verdugo, M.A., Caballo, C., Balboni, G., Lachapelle, Y., Otrebski, W., & Schalock, R.L. (2005). Cross-cultural study of person-centered quality of life domains and indicators: a replication. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 48(10), 734-739.
18.
Keith, K.D., & Bonham, G.S. ( 2005). The use of quality of life data at the organization and systems level. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research , 49(10), 799-805.
19.
Lachapelle, Y., Wehmeyer, M.L., Haelewyck, M.-C., Courbois, Y., Keith, K.D., Schalock, R.L., . . . Walsh, P.N. ( 2005). The relationship between quality of life and self-determination: An international study. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 49(10), 740-744.
20.
Lord, J.E., Guernsey, K.N., Balfe, J.M., & Karr, V.L. ( 2007). Human Rights. YES! Action and advocacy on the rights of persons with disabilities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Human Rights Center.
21.
Mithaug, D.E. ( 1998). Your right, my obligation? Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 23(1), 41-43.
22.
Mung’omba, J. ( 2008). Comparative policy brief: Status of intellectual disabilities in the Republic of Zambia. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 5(2), 142-144.
23.
National Planning Commission and Central Bureau of Statistics. (2001). Retrieved October 12, 2008, from http://www.cbs.gov.np/Population/National%20Report%202001/tab22.htm
24.
Nota, L., Ferrari, L., Soresi, S., & Wehmeyer, M.L. (2007). Self-determination, social abilities and the quality of life of people with intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 51(11), 850-865.
25.
Perkins, D.D., & Zimmerman, M.A. (1995). Empowerment theory, research, and application. American Journal of Community Psychology , 23(5), 569-579.
26.
Protection and Welfare of the Disabled Persons Act 2039. (1982 ). Retrieved October 12, 2008, from http://www.dhrcnepal.org.np/dawnload/DWP_Act_2039.pdf
27.
Protection and Welfare of the Disabled Persons Rules-2051. ( 1994). Retrieved October 12, 2008, from http://www.dhrcnepal.org.np/dawnload/DWP_%20Rules_2051.pdf
28.
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 794 et seq. (1973).
29.
Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Employment Policy for Persons With Disabilities. (2006). 2005 disability status reports. Ithaca, NY: Author.
30.
Sabatello, M. ( 2005, May). The human rights of persons with intellectual disabilities: Different but equal [Book review]. Human Rights Quarterly , 27(2), 737-749.
31.
Schalock, R.L. ( 1996). Reconsidering the conceptualization and measurement of quality of life. In R. L. Schalock (Ed.), Quality of life: Conceptualization and measurement (Vol. 1, pp. 123-139). Washington, DC.: American Association on Mental Retardation .
32.
Schalock, R.L. ( 2005). Introduction and overview. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 110(4), 695-698.
33.
Schalock, R.L., & Keith, K.D. ( 1993). Quality of Life Questionnaire manual. Worthington, OH: IDS Publishing.
34.
Schalock, R.L., Verdugo, M.A., Jenaro, C., Wang, M., Wehmeyer, M.L., Jiancheng, X., & Lachapelle, Y. (2005). Cross-cultural study of quality of life indicators. American Journal of Mental Retardation , 110(4), 298-311.
35.
Schur, L. ( 2002). Dead-end jobs or a path to economic well-being? The consequences of nonstandard work for people with disabilities. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 20, 601-620.
36.
Shogren, K.A., Wehmeyer, M.L., Palmer, S.B., Soukup, J.H., Little, T.D., Garner, N., & Lawrence, M. ( 2007). Examining individual and ecological predictors of the self-determination of students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 73(4), 488-509.
37.
Stancliffe, R.J., Abery, B.H., & Smith, J. ( 2000). Personal control and the ecology of community living settings: Beyond living-unit size and type. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 105(6), 431-454.
38.
Turnbull, A.P., & Turnbull, H.R. (2001). Self-determination for individuals with significant cognitive disabilities and their families. Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 26(1), 56-62.
39.
UN Enable. (2006). Draft Convention on the Rights of Persons With Disabilities: Article 35-Reports by states parties. Retrieved December 7, 2010, from http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/enable/rights/ahc8adart.htm#art35
40.
UN Enable. ( 2008). Convention and optional protocol signatures and ratifications . Retrieved October6, 2010, from http:// www.un.org/disabilities/countries.asp?navid=12&pid=166
41.
United Nations General Assembly. (2006, December 6). Final report of the Ad Hoc Committee on a Comprehensive and Integral International Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Rights and Dignity of Persons With Disabilities. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/enable/rights/ahcfinalrepe.htm
42.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2002). Table DP-2. Profile of selected social characteristics: 2000. In U.S. Summary: 2000: Census 2000 profile. Retrieved December 7, 2010, from http://www.census.gov/prod/2002pubs/c2kprof00-us.pdf
43.
Vaughn, J.R. ( 2008). Finding the gaps: A comparative analysis of disability laws in the United States to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons With Disabilities. Washington, DC: National Council on Disability.
44.
Vitello, S. J., & Mithaug, D. E. (Eds.). (1998). Inclusive schooling: National and international perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
45.
Wehmeyer, M.L. ( 1996). Self-determination as an educational outcome: Why is it important to children and adults with disabilities? In D. J. Sands & M. L. Wehmeyer (Eds.), Self-determination across the life span: Independence and choice for people with disabilities (pp. 15-34). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
46.
Wehmeyer, M.L., Abery, B.H., Mithaug, D.E., & Stancliffe, R.J. (2003). Theory in self-determination . Springfield, MA: Charles C. Thomas .
47.
Wehmeyer, M.L., & Bolding, N. ( 2001). Enhanced self-determination of adults with intellectual disability as an outcome of moving to community-based work or living environments . Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 45(5), 371-383.
48.
Wehmeyer, M.L., & Garner, N.W. ( 2003). The impact of personal characteristics of people with intellectual and developmental disability on self-determination and autonomous functioning. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities , 16, 255-265.
49.
Wehmeyer, M.L., & Schalock, R.L. (2001). Self-determination and quality of life: Implications for special education services and supports . Focus on Exceptional Children, 33(8), 1-16.
50.
Wehmeyer, M.L., & Schwartz, M. ( 1997). Self-determination and positive adult outcomes: A follow-up study of youth with mental retardation or learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 63(2), 245-255.
51.
Wehmeyer, M.L., & Schwartz, M. ( 1998). The relationship between self-determination and quality of life for adults with mental retardation. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 33(1), 3-12.
52.
Wolfe, P.S., Ofiesh, N.S., & Boone, R.B. ( 1996). Self-advocacy preparation of consumers with disabilities: A national perspective of ADA training efforts. Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 21(2), 81-87.
53.
Wolman, J., Campeau, P., DeBois, P.A., Mithaug, D.E., & Stolarski, V.S. (1994). AIR Self-Determined Scale . Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research.
54.
World Health Organization. (2005). Disability and rehabilitation: Global programming note 2005-2007. Promoting access to healthcare services for persons with disabilities. Retrieved January 29, 2006, from http://www.who.int/nmh/donorinfo/vip_promoting_access_healthcare_rehabilitation_v2.pdf
55.
Yasuda, S., Wehman, P., Targett, P., Cifu, D.X., & West, M. ( 2002). Return to work after spinal cord injury: A review of recent research. NeuroRehabilitation, 7(3), 77-86.
56.
Young, K., & Rau, S. ( 2007). International monitoring: The right to inclusion, the obligation to participate. International Rehabilitation Review , 56(1), 37-38.
