Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2011-3
An Introductory Theoretical and Methodological Framework for a Universal Mobility Index (UMI) to Quantify,Compare,and Longitudinally Track Equity of Access Across the Built Environment
A new composite human development indicator—the Universal Mobility Index (UMI)—is introduced. A methodology is developed for the operationalization of the index. The UMI comprehensively interlaces at the node formed by the intersection of current social understanding of disability and policy affecting physical access in the built environment. The index quantitatively measures, comparatively rates, and longitudinally tracks equity of access. It is the first and only tool that measures the lived experience of physical access across all parts of the built environment, illuminating how barriers to mobility discriminately constrain the autonomy of people with disabilities to exercise their full human capabilities. The UMI empowers people with disabilities by incorporating their own assessments of barrier severity and prioritization. A policy environment component scrutinizes the inclusion of the opinions of people with disabilities in the policy-making processes affecting the built environment. Adoption of the UMI by government and nongovernment organizations can address the fragmented nature of current access considerations across the built environment and the exclusion of people with disabilities in the policy process that shapes this environment.
Albert, B., Dube, A.K., Riis-Hansen, P., & Trine, C. ( 2005). Has disability been mainstreamed into development cooperation? Retrieved from http://www.disabilitykar.net/docs/thematic_main.doc
2.
Allison, G.T. ( 1971). Essence of decision: Explaining the Cuban missile crisis . Boston, MA: Little Brown.
3.
Anderson, J.E. ( 1994). Public policymaking: An introduction (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin .
4.
Asian Development Bank. (2005, June). Disabled people and development (Poverty and Social Development Papers, No. 12). Mandaluyong City, Philippines: Poverty Reduction and Social Development Division, Regional and Sustainable Development Department , Asian Development Bank.
5.
Australian Building Codes Board. (2010). Disability standards for access to premises (buildings) 200x. Retrieved from http://www.abcb.gov.au/index.cfm?fuseaction=Publications
Batavia, A., & Schriner, K. ( 2001). The Americans With Disabilities Act as engine of social change: Models of disability and the potential of a civil rights approach . Policy Studies Journal, 29(4), 690-702.
8.
Bickenbach, J.E. ( 1993). Physical disability & social policy. Toronto, Canada: Toronto University Press.
9.
Bickenbach, J.E., Chatterji, S., Badley, E.M., & Ustun, T.B. ( 1999). Models of disablement, universalism and the international classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps. Social Science & Medicine, 48(9), 1173-1188.
10.
Bochel, H., Bochel, B., Page, R., & Sykes, R. ( 2005). Social policy: Issues and developments. Harlow, UK: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
11.
Booysen, F. ( 2002). An overview and evaluation of composite indices of development . Social Indicators Research, 59(2), 115.
12.
Bridgeman, P., & Davis, G. ( 2004). The Australian policy handbook (3rd ed.). Sydney, Australia: Allen & Unwin.
13.
Burch, M., & Wood, B. ( 1989). Public policy in Britain. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
14.
Camfield, L. ( 2003). Using subjective measures of wellbeing in developing countries. Retrieved from http://www.devstud.org.uk/publications/papers/conf03/dsaconf03camfield.pdf
15.
Center for Universal Design. (2006). The Center for Universal Design: Environment and products for all people. Retrieved Oct 24th 2010. http://www.ncsu.edu/www./ncsu/design/sod5/cud/about_ud/udprinciples.htm
16.
Clear, M., & Gleeson, B. ( 2001). Disability and materialist embodiment. Journal of Australian Political Economy, 49(1), 34-55.
17.
Considine, M. ( 1994). Public policy: A critical approach. South Melbourne: Macmillan Education Australia.
18.
Disabled People’s International. (2006 ). First disability strategy in election 2006 on the right track . Retrieved from http://v1.dpi.org/langen/resources/topics_detail?page=443
19.
Disabled People’s International Latin American Region. (2005, Sept 5-9). Disability in the summit of the Americas: An essential poverty elimination strategy, Tegucigalpa, Honduras . Retrieved from http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/7/6/
20.
Dowrick, S., & Quiggin, J. ( 1998). Measures of economic activity and welfare: Uses and abuses of GDP. In R. Eckersley (Ed.), Measuring progress: Is life getting better (pp. 93-107). Collingwood , Australia: CSIRO.
21.
Doyal, L., & Gough, I. ( 1991). A theory of human need. Hound-mills, UKMacmillan.
22.
Dube, T., Hurst, R., Light, R., & Malinga, J. ( 2005). Promoting inclusion?Disabled people, legislation and public policy. Retrieved from http://www.disabilitykar.net/research/thematic_legis.html
23.
Dunn, W., Brown, C., & McGuigan, A. ( 1994). The ecology of human performance: A framework for considering the effect of context. American Journal of Occupational Therapy , 48, 595-607.
24.
European Disability Forum. (2002). EDF policy paper: Development cooperation and disability. Retrieved from http://www.dpi.org/en/resources/topics/europe/2003-05-15_EDFPolicyPaperonDevelopment.htm
25.
Feinsilver, J. ( 1993). Healing the masses: Cuban health politics at home and abroad. Berkeley: University of California Press.
26.
Finkelstein, V. ( 1993). The commonality of disability. In V. Finkelstein, J. Swain, S. French, & M. Oliver (Eds.), Disabling barriers-Enabling environments (pp. 307-318). London, UK: Open University.
27.
Finkelstein, V., & Stuart, O. ( 1996). Developing new services. In G. Hales (Ed.), Beyond disability: Toward an enabling society (pp. 170-187). London, UK: Sage.
28.
Fischer, F. ( 1995). Evaluation public policy. Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
29.
Foweraker, J., & Krznaric, R. ( 2002). The uneven performance of third wave democracies: Electoral politics and the imperfect rule of law in Latin America. Latin American Politics and Society, 44(3), 29-62.
30.
Freedom House. (n.d.). Freedom house. Retrieved from http://www.freedomhouse.org/template.cfm?page=1
31.
Gleeson, B. ( 1999). Beyond goodwill: The materialist view of disability. Social Alternatives, 18(1), 11-17.
32.
Gross, B.H., & Hahn, H. ( 2004). Developing issues in the classification of mental and physical disabilities. Journal of Disability Policy Studies , 15(3), 130-135.
33.
Hagerty, M., Cummins, R., Ferriss, A., & Land, K. ( 2001). Quality of life indexes for national policy: Review and agenda for research. Social Indicators Research, 55(1), 1.
34.
Hahn, H. ( 1985). Towards a politics of disability: Definitions, disciplines and policies. Social Science Journal, 22(4), 87-105.
35.
Hahn, H. ( 1993). The political implications of disability definitions and date. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 4, 41-52.
36.
Hahn, H. ( 1994). The minority group model of disability: Implications for medical sociology. Research in the Sociology of Health Care, 11(3), 24.
37.
Hahn, H. ( 1998). The politics of physical differences: Disability and discrimination. Journal of Social Issues, 44, 39-47.
38.
Hill, M. ( 1999). Breaking into adaptable housing: A cost benefit analysis of adaptable homes. Retrieved from www.anuhd.org/publications/ACT%20Cost%20Benefit.doc
39.
Hirst, M., & Baldwin, S. ( 1994). Unequal opportunities: Growing up disabled (Social Policy Research Unit). York, UK: University of York.
40.
Humana, C. ( 1992). World human rights guide (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
41.
Imrie, R. ( 2004). Demystifying disability: A review of the international classification of functioning, disability and health. Sociology of Health & Illness, 26(3), 287-305.
42.
Imrie, R., & Kumar, M. ( 1998). Focusing on disability and access in the built environment . Disability & Society, 13(3), 357-375.
43.
Johnston, M. ( 1994). Models of disability. The Psychologist , 7, 205-212.
44.
Kaplan, D. ( 2004). Universal design for disabled people draws international support, report on international design. Rio de Janeiro , Brazil: Retrieved 24th Oct 2010 from http://www.disabilityworld.org/cgi-bin/pfp.cgi?doc=self&top=self&bottom=self
45.
Kidder, L., & Judd, C. ( 1986). Research methods in social relations. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
46.
Larason-Schneider, A., & Ingram, H. ( 1997). Policy design for democracy. Lawrence : University of Kansas Press.
47.
Lemert, E. ( 1962). Human deviance: Social problems and social control. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
48.
Lindblom, C.E. ( 1959). The science of muddling through. Public Administration Review, 19, 78-88.
49.
Lindblom, C.E. ( 1977). Politics and markets: The world’s political economic systems. New York, NY: Basic Books .
50.
Lustig, D., & Strauser, D. ( 2004). A living wage for individuals with disabilities: Implications for rehabilitation professionals. Journal of Rehabilitation , 70(2), 3-5.
51.
McGillivray, M. ( 1991). The human development index: Yet another redundant composite development indicator? World Development, 19(10), 1461-1468.
52.
McGillivray, M. ( 2005). Accessing progress in developing countries: Course guide . Melbourne, Australia: School of Social Science and Planning, HUSO1145, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology.
53.
McGillivray, M., & Clarke, M. ( 2006). Understanding human well-being. Tokyo , Japan: United Nations University Press.
54.
Minkler, M., & Fadem, P. ( 2002). Successful aging: A disability perspective. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 12, 229-235.
55.
Mokhiner, C.G. ( 2001). Toward a measure of dignity: Indicators for rights-based development. Statistical Journal of the UN Economic Commission for Europe, 18(2/3), 155-162.
56.
Moore, M., Beazley, S., & Maelzer, J. ( 1998). Researching disability issues. Buckingham , UK: Open University Press.
57.
Neuman, W. ( 2003). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
58.
Ntlatlapa, M.Z. ( 2005). The national policy on the inclusion of persons with disabilities into society: A justification. Retrieved from http://v1.dpi.org/lang-en/resources/details.php?page=650
59.
Nussbaum, M.C. ( 1995). Human capabilities, female human beings. In M. C. Nussbaum & J. Glover (Eds.), Women, culture, and development: A study of human capabilities (pp. 61- 104). Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press.
60.
O’Hara, B. ( 2004). Twice penalized: Employment discrimination against women with disabilities. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 15(1), 27-35.
61.
Oliver, M. ( 1995). Understanding disability: From theory to practice. New York, NY: St. Martin’s.
62.
Peat, M. ( 1997). Attitudes and access: Advancing the rights of people with disabilities. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 156(5), 657.
63.
Pennell, R. ( 2001). Self-determination and self-advocacy. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 11(4), 223.
Phillips, D. ( 2006). Quality of life: Concept, policy and practice. New York, NY: Routledge.
66.
Putnam, M. ( 2005). Conceptualizing disability: Developing a framework for political disability identity. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 16(3), 188-198.
67.
Ratcliffe, J. ( 1978). Social justice and the demographic transition: Lessons from India’s Kerala state. International Journal of Health Services, 8(1), 123-144.
68.
Rydeen, J. ( 1999). Universal design. American School & University, 71(9), 56-60.
69.
Sabatier, P.A., & Jenkins-Smith, H.C. (1993). Policy change and learning: An advocacy coalition approach. Boulder, CO: Westview.
70.
Schriner, K., & Scotch, R.K. ( 2001). Disability and institutional change: A human variation perspective on overcoming oppression. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 12(2), 100-107.
71.
Schuller, N. ( 2005). Disabled people, crime and social inclusion. Community Safety Journal, 4(3), 4-14.
72.
Sen, A. ( 1989). Development as capability expansion. Journal of Development Planning, 19(41), 58.
73.
Sen, A. ( 1993). Capability and well-being. In A. Sen & M. C. Nussbaum (Eds.), The quality of life (pp. 30-53). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
74.
Sen, A. ( 1999). Development as freedom. New York, NY: Knopf.
75.
Shakespeare, T.W. ( 1996). Power and prejudice: Issues of gender, sexuality and disability. In L. Barton (Ed.), Disability and society: Some emerging issues (pp. 191-214). Harlow, UK: Longman.
76.
Sharkansky, I. ( 1970). The routine of politics. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
77.
Social Policy Research Centre. (2000). Socio-economic disadvantage and the prevalence of disability. Retrieved from http://hnb.dhs.vic.gov.au/ds/disabilityimages.nsf/images/socioecon/$file/socioecon.pdf
78.
Story, M.F., Mueller, J.L., & Mace, R.L. ( 1998). The universal design file: Designing for people of all ages and abilities. Retrieved from http://www.design.ncsu.edu/cud/pubs_p/pudfiletoc.htm
79.
Takamine, Y. ( 2004). Disability issues in East Asia: Review and ways forward (Working Paper Series No. 2004-1). Washington, DC: World Bank.
80.
Thomas, P. ( 2005). Poverty reduction and development in Cambodia: Enabling disabled people to play a role. Retrieved from http://www.disabilitykar.net/pdfs/cambodia.pdf
81.
Tuman, J., Emmert, C., & Sterken, R. ( 2001). Explaining Japanese aid policy in Latin America: A test of competing theories. Political Research Quarterly, 54(1), 87-91.
82.
Turnbull, H.R., & Stowe, M.J. ( 2001). Five models for thinking about disability: Implications for policy responses. Journal of Disability Policy Studies , 12(3), 198-207.
83.
United Nations Development Programme. (1993 ). People’s participation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
84.
United Nations Development Programme. (2001 ). Making new technologies work for human development. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
85.
United Nations Development Programme. (2002 ). Deepening democracy in a fragmented world. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
86.
United Nations Development Programme. (2004 ). Cultural liberty in today’s diverse world. New York, NY: Author.
87.
Vrkljan, B.H. ( 2005). Reflections on . . . dispelling the disability stereotype: Embracing a universalistic perspective of disablement. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 72(1), 57.
88.
World Bank. (1999). Poverty and disability: A survey of the literature (Social Protection Discussion Paper Series No. 9932). Washington, DC: Social Protection Unit, Human Development Network, World Bank.
89.
World Bank. (2000a). Disability issues, trends and recommendations for the World Bank (Social Protection Discussion Paper No. 000723068). Washington, DC: Author.
90.
World Bank. (2000b). Including the most vulnerable: Social funds and people with disabilities ( Social Protection Discussion Paper Series No. 23143). Washington, DC: Social Protection Unit, Human Development Network, World Bank.
91.
Zola, I.K. ( 1989). Toward the necessary universalizing of a disability policy . Milbank Quarterly, 67, 401.
