Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study evaluates disabled veteran compensation law against its stated objective, equalizing the pay differential associated with disability. The significance of this study is that it provides insight into the efficacy of disabled veteran compensation policy, which derives from tables listed in the Code of Federal Regulations (38 CFR 4). In some cases, these tables have not been updated since 1945. Through regression analysis, personal income (appropriately transformed) is modeled as a function of four variable blocks (demographics, education, geographical, and veteran-related) using secondary data from the 2007 American Community Survey. The population includes working-age adults ages 18 to 64 (n = 1.8 million, representing N = 190 million U.S. citizens). Regression captured 37.2% of the variance in personal income. Veteran-related variables (entered last into the model) accounted for 2.2% of the unique variance. The sample size guaranteed statistical significance, but the analysis proved practically relevant. Disabled veteran status had a large and negative effect, especially as the number of disabilities increased. The results suggest that disabled veterans who have multiple categories of disabilities do not receive income on par with society or with disabled nonveterans reporting the same number of disabilities. This finding provides evidence that 38 CFR 4 is ineffective.

Keywords

finance employment law/legal issues policy veteran regression

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Benitez-Silva, H. , Buchinsky, M. , Chan, H.M. , Cheidvasser, S. , & Rust, J. ( 2004). How large is the bias in self-reported disability? Journal of Applied Econometrics, 19, 649-670.

Crisp, R. ( 2005). Key factors related to vocational outcomes: Trends for six disability groups. Journal of Rehabilitation, 71(4), 30-37.

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations. (2002 ). Title 38, Part 4. Retrieved February 1, 2009 , from http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title38/38cfr4_main_02.tpl

Freeberg, S. ( 2008, July 18). Pilot program may overhaul treatment of veterans . National Journal. Retrieved February 1, 2009, from http://www.govexec.com/dailyfed/0708/071808nj1.htm

Gamboa, A.M. , Holland, G.H. , Tierney, J.P. , & Gibson, D.S. ( 2006). American community survey: Earnings and employment for persons with traumatic brain injury. Neurorehabilitation, 21, 327-333.

Gollaher, K. , High, W. , Sherer, M. , Bergloff, P. , Boake, C. , & Young, M.E. , et al. (1998). Prediction of employment outcomes one to three years following traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury , 12, 255-263.

Health and Human Services Poverty Guidelines. (2008, January 23). Federal Register, 73(15), 3971-3972.

Kennedy, J. , & Olney, M. ( 2006). Factors associated with workforce participation among SSDI beneficiaries. Journal of Rehabilitation, 72(4), 24-30.

Kennedy, K. ( 2008). Experts: VA disability system can be fixed. Navy Times. Retrieved February 1, 2009, from http://www.navytimes.com/news/2008/02/military_disabilityratings_022708w/

10.

Minkler, M. , Fuller-Thomson, E. , & Guralnik, J.M. (2006). Gradient of disability across the socioeconomic spectrum in the United States. New England Journal of Medicine, 355, 695-703.

11.

SPSS Inc. (2008). SPSS Base 17.0 for Windows User’s Guide. Chicago: Author.

12.

U.S. Census Bureau. (2007a). Accuracy of the data: 2007 American community survey. Retrieved February 1, 2009, from http://www.census.gov/acs/www./Downloads/ACS/accuracy2007.pdf

13.

U.S. Census Bureau. (2007b). American community survey state median family income by family size. Retrieved February 1, 2009, from http://blueprod.ssd.census.gov/hhes/www./income/statemedfaminc.html

14.

U.S. Census Bureau. (2007c). Annual estimates of the population for the United States, regions, states, and Puerto Rico: April 1, 2000 to July 1, 2007. Retrieved February 1, 2009, from http://www.census.gov/popest/states/tables/NST-EST2007-01.xls

15.

U.S. Census Bureau. (2007d). A compass for understanding and using American community survey data. Retrieved February 1, 2009, from http://www.census.gov/acs/www./Downloads/ACSGeneralHandbook.pdf

16.

U.S. Census Bureau. (2007e, October 11). Facts for features Veterans Day 2007 (Rep. No. CB07-FF.16). Retrieved February 1, 2009, from http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/www./releases/archives/facts_for_features_special_editions/010733.html

17.

U.S. Census Bureau. (2007f). How to use the data, subject definitions. Retrieved February 1, 2009, from http://www.census.gov/acs/www./UseData/Def.htm

18.

U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. (2006 ). Veterans Benefits Administration annual benefits report fy2006 , Retrieved February 1, 2009, from http://www.vba.va.gov/2006_abr.pdf

19.

U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. (2008 b). VA compensation benefits rate tables-effective 12/1/2008 . Retrieved February 1, 2009, from www.vba.va.gov/BLN/21/rates/comp01.htm

20.

Vlahos, K. ( 2007). Big law firms represent service members navigating VA disability system. Foxnews.com. Retrieved February 1, 2009, from http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,281393,00.html

21.

Weathers, R. ( 2005). A guide to disability statistics from the American Community Survey. Retrieved February 1, 2009, from the Rehabilitation Training and Research Center, Cornell University Web site , http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/edicollect/123/

22.

Wilkins, R. ( 2004). The effects of disability on labour force status in Australia . Australian Economic Review, 37, 359-382.

A Comparison of Disabled Veteran and Nonveteran Income

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References